Teams

SFV - Trial & Error

2023 Mixed Tri-Level 18+ SFV Fall · SFV Tri-Level Mixed 3.0-4.0

10 players · average NTRP 3.81 / SO.CALIFORNIA

No matches recorded for this roster in this league — it may be a placeholder registration, or the season may not have started.

View scouting list →
Schedule6 played
2023-11-12Won 10
W#3 DoublesDaniel Peterson-Beliakoff / Margie Englis vs Doug Cragoe / Stephanie Johnson6-2, 6-4
2023-10-28Won 10
W#1 DoublesEdmond Avedisian / Sara Heum vs N/A6-0, 6-0
2023-10-15vs SFV - Trifecta MixedWon 10
W#3 DoublesOla Heum / Margie Englis vs Peter Na / Gabrielle Shrier6-3, 6-3
2023-10-08vs SFV - Paseo Triple ThreatWon 20
W#1 DoublesEdmond Avedisian / Raizzi Rodriguez vs Stephanie Hall / Harris Hall6-2, 1-6, 1-0
W#3 DoublesDaniel Peterson-Beliakoff / Margie Englis vs Jason O'Leary / Salisa Wagner7-5, 6-2
2023-10-01vs SFV LLW - Smash & Dash - Dan LulaLost 01
L#1 DoublesEdmond Avedisian / Sara Heum vs Josh LeVasseur / Arianne Rudes1-6, 2-6
2023-09-24vs SFV - Nice AcesWon 20
W#1 DoublesEdmond Avedisian / Raizzi Rodriguez vs Stephen Nettelhorst / Melissa Fonteboa6-3, 4-6, 1-0
W#3 DoublesDaniel Peterson-Beliakoff / Margie Englis vs Manny Kreitenberg / Veronica Garcia6-0, 6-2
A tie can be incomplete. Tell us if someone is missing.
i
Grouped by tie — one fixture, several lines. A line shows only when a player on it is someone we have indexed, so an early-season tie for a newly-added team can look short. This also means the line count here will not match the header, which counts individual player appearances.

Flight standings for SFV Tri-Level Mixed 3.0-4.0 have not been collected yet. Where we have them we show every team in the flight ranked, with this team highlighted. The crawler is still filling in older seasons and flights.

ScoutingWhere each opponent usually plays

Signed-in extra: whether this captain plays strict strength order or mixes it up, from every doubles line they have put out. Create a free account to see it.

Roster averages 3.52 estimated across 9 rated players. No lineup is published in advance, so the column below is where each player has actually been used — a captain's habits are the best available forecast. Sign in and claim your record to see who you have played.

3.96
Abbey Everson
published 4
3.87
Sara Heum
published 4
3.72
Raizzi Rodriguez
published 4
3.59
Edmond Avedisian
usually #1 Doubles 100% · published 4
3.50
Deepak Antony
published 4
3.37
Margie Englis
usually #3 Doubles 100% · published 3.5
3.36
Ola Heum
published
3.22
Sergio Martinez
published
3.09
David Berkowitz
published 3.5
Roster

Ordered by our estimated dynamic rating, which is why two players at the same published level are not tied — a published 4.0 says nothing about where inside the band someone sits. Lines played in this team’s season are shown beside each name.

4
Abbey Everson
157W–106L career · no lines in 2023
<1%62%38%
3.96
4
Sara Heum
122W–69L career · no lines in 2023
<1%83%17%
3.87
4
Raizzi Rodriguez
94W–70L career · no lines in 2023
6%92%2%
3.72
4
Edmond Avedisian
104W–115L career · 4 lines in 2023
26%74%<1%
3.59
4
Deepak Antony
4W–16L career · no lines in 2023
49%51%<1%
3.50
3.5
Margie Englis
169W–111L career · 4 lines in 2023
<1%83%17%
3.37
Ola Heum
4W–11L career · no lines in 2023
85%15%<1%
3.36
3.5
Daniel Peterson-Beliakoff
0W–2L career · no lines in 2023
not enough data
Sergio Martinez
7W–3L career · no lines in 2023
6%92%2%
3.22
3.5
David Berkowitz
4W–6L career · no lines in 2023
25%75%<1%
3.09

Three percentages are where each player stands right now: the chance they are below their band, inside it, or above it, on the way they are playing this season. The number on the right is our estimated dynamic rating, which USTA never publishes. This is today rather than a forecast of December, because a forecast has to assume future matches and cannot know whether someone will even be offered them. Percentages are blank where a player has too few matches this season, or at a level where the model does not yet beat a base-rate guess; the estimate is a weaker claim than a probability and survives where those do not.

Not affiliated with or endorsed by the USTA. Ratings labelled as published are USTA year-end figures; anything we describe as an estimate is ours, not USTA’s. Match data is from USTA TennisLink.