Teams

Wood/Knoxville

2024 Adult 18 & Over-Knoxville · 2.5 Women

7 players · average NTRP 2.50 / TENNESSEE

View scouting list →
Schedule8 played
2024-05-04vs Bagwell/KnoxvilleLost 12
W#1 DoublesMartha Filipkowski / Kimberly Wunderlich vs Joy Bray / Allison Oaks6-3, 6-1
L#1 SinglesCori Smith vs Renee Bagwell2-6, 4-6
L#2 DoublesBetsy Wood / Janet Jungclaus vs Kelley Sohn / Ashley Webb3-6, 4-6
2024-04-27vs Dunn/KnoxvilleLost 02
L#1 DoublesBetsy Wood / Janet Jungclaus vs Rhonda Mann / Angela Gustin3-6, 4-6
L#2 DoublesMelissa Kirby / Nicole Webb vs Misty Gouge / Emma Poindexter4-6, 5-7
2024-04-20vs Harris/KnoxvilleLost 12
L#1 DoublesBetsy Wood / Martha Filipkowski vs Stacy McIntosh / Windsor Wall0-6, 1-6
W#1 SinglesCori Smith vs Holly Hoyle6-2, 6-4
L#2 DoublesNicole Webb / Carly Maltais vs Laurel Martin / Nicole Haas5-7, 6-4, 0-1
2024-04-13vs Bagwell/KnoxvilleLost 02
L#1 DoublesCori Smith / Betsy Wood vs Ashley Webb / Kelley Sohn0-6, 2-6
L#2 DoublesKimberly Ford / Nicole Webb vs Joy Bray / Kaleigh Bray1-6, 2-6
2024-04-06vs Perry/KnoxvilleWon 20
W#1 DoublesJanet Jungclaus / Martha Filipkowski vs Catherine Shuman / Deanne Michaelson6-2, 6-4
W#1 SinglesCori Smith vs Ashley Myers6-0, 6-1
2024-03-28vs Perry/KnoxvilleLost 12
L#1 DoublesBetsy Wood / Janet Jungclaus vs Maria Willard / Keri Brill3-6, 4-6
W#1 SinglesCori Smith vs Natalia Ward3-6, 6-2, 1-0
L#2 DoublesCarly Maltais / Leigh Gatto vs Joanna Case / Deanne Michaelson0-6, 2-6
2024-03-23vs Dunn/KnoxvilleSplit 11
L#1 DoublesBetsy Wood / Nicole Webb vs Rhonda Mann / Angela Gustin0-6, 1-6
W#2 DoublesKimberly Ford / Kimberly Wunderlich vs Ashley Tipton / Katharine Brosnan6-0, 6-1
2024-03-16vs Harris/KnoxvilleLost 12
L#1 DoublesNicole Webb / Kimberly Wunderlich vs Nicole Haas / Stacy McIntosh2-6, 6-4, 0-1
W#1 SinglesJanet Jungclaus vs Holly Hoyle6-0, 6-4
L#2 DoublesMelissa Kirby / Leigh Gatto vs Emilie Harris / Laurel Martin2-6, 3-6
A tie can be incomplete. Tell us if someone is missing.
i
Grouped by tie — one fixture, several lines. A line shows only when a player on it is someone we have indexed, so an early-season tie for a newly-added team can look short. This also means the line count here will not match the header, which counts individual player appearances.

Flight standings for 2.5 Women have not been collected yet. Where we have them we show every team in the flight ranked, with this team highlighted. The crawler is still filling in older seasons and flights.

ScoutingWhere each opponent usually plays

Signed-in extra: whether this captain plays strict strength order or mixes it up, from every doubles line they have put out. Create a free account to see it.

Roster averages 2.06 estimated across 2 rated players. No lineup is published in advance, so the column below is where each player has actually been used — a captain's habits are the best available forecast. Sign in and claim your record to see who you have played.

2.33
Martha Filipkowski
usually #1 Doubles 100% · published
Carly Maltais
usually #2 Doubles 100% · published 2.5
Cori Smith
usually #1 Singles 80%, also #1 Doubles 20% · published 2.5
1.79
Leigh Gatto
usually #2 Doubles 33%, also #3 Doubles 17% · published
Janet Jungclaus
usually #1 Doubles 44%, also #1 Singles 33% · published
Kimberly Wunderlich
usually #1 Doubles 40%, also #3 Doubles 20% · published
Nicole Webb
usually #2 Doubles 60%, also #1 Doubles 40% · published
Roster

Ordered by our estimated dynamic rating, which is why two players at the same published level are not tied — a published 4.0 says nothing about where inside the band someone sits. Lines played in this team’s season are shown beside each name.

Martha Filipkowski
18W–31L career · 3 lines in 2024
0%91%9%
2.33
2.5
Carly Maltais
0W–4L career · 2 lines in 2024
not enough data
2.5
Cori Smith
4W–5L career · 5 lines in 2024
not enough data
Leigh Gatto
3W–42L career · 5 lines in 2024
0%>99%<1%
1.79
Janet Jungclaus
6W–18L career · 9 lines in 2024
not enough data
Kimberly Wunderlich
3W–4L career · 5 lines in 2024
not enough data
Nicole Webb
0W–5L career · 5 lines in 2024
not enough data

Three percentages are where each player stands right now: the chance they are below their band, inside it, or above it, on the way they are playing this season. The number on the right is our estimated dynamic rating, which USTA never publishes. This is today rather than a forecast of December, because a forecast has to assume future matches and cannot know whether someone will even be offered them. Percentages are blank where a player has too few matches this season, or at a level where the model does not yet beat a base-rate guess; the estimate is a weaker claim than a probability and survives where those do not.

Not affiliated with or endorsed by the USTA. Ratings labelled as published are USTA year-end figures; anything we describe as an estimate is ours, not USTA’s. Match data is from USTA TennisLink.