Teams

ETC Tennis...etc., etc.-Tiberi

2024 Adult 18 & Over · 2.5 Men

10 players · average NTRP 2.75 / NORTHWEST WASHINGTON

View scouting list →
Schedule8 played
2024-05-31vs FC-Atreides-DayWon 20
W#1 DoublesFilip Mamic / Lucio Tiberi vs Richard Gould / Wenwei Jiang6-4, 6-2
W#2 DoublesDevkumar Patel / Mehrdad Mozafari vs Nicholas Yee / JEREMY VANBUREN6-1, 4-6, 1-0
2024-05-18vs CAC/SL-Moon Ballers-NormileLost 12
L#1 DoublesLucio Tiberi / Rush Velcsov vs Sai Muppa / Prasad Pande2-6, 1-6
W#1 SinglesJianfeng Zeng vs Nikita Amelin6-3, 6-0
L#2 DoublesDevkumar Patel / Mehrdad Mozafari vs Sandeep Andre / Rohan Matthew Augustus3-6, 4-6
2024-05-10vs CAC/SL-Moon Ballers-NormileWon 30
W#1 DoublesKyle Peterson / Rush Velcsov vs Nikita Amelin / Sandeep Andre6-3, 7-5
W#1 SinglesJianfeng Zeng vs Sai Muppa6-1, 6-1
W#2 DoublesUtsav Prabhu / Ravdeep Pasricha vs Colin Bohn / Patrick Normile6-3, 6-1
2024-05-05vs CP-Racquet Rascals-MeylesWon 21
W#1 DoublesDevkumar Patel / Kyle Peterson vs Jeff Trager / Atanas Koralski6-3, 4-6, 1-0
W#1 SinglesUtsav Prabhu vs Bryce Danz3-6, 6-4, 1-0
L#2 DoublesRavdeep Pasricha / Mehrdad Mozafari vs Zhentao Lin / Doug Chapman6-1, 6-7, 0-1
2024-04-27vs HBSQ-Channel Club-RichLost 12
L#1 DoublesKyle Peterson / Mehrdad Mozafari vs Sanjay Chopra / Daryl Okamura3-6, 3-6
L#1 SinglesUtsav Prabhu vs Yosuke Miyashita6-0, 3-6, 0-1
W#2 DoublesRush Velcsov / Lucio Tiberi vs Chris Tifre / Michael Kosten6-1, 6-2
2024-04-12vs MC-Men's 2.5-TurnerWon 21
L#1 DoublesRavdeep Pasricha / Utsav Prabhu vs Jeremy Turner / Prateek Shankar4-6, 5-7
W#1 SinglesJianfeng Zeng vs Sasan Boostani6-0, 6-1
W#2 DoublesMiroslav Spassov / Filip Mamic vs Hoa Nguyen / Roger Seielstad6-4, 6-0
2024-04-05vs HBSQ-Channel Club-RichLost 12
L#1 DoublesDevkumar Patel / Kyle Peterson vs Forrest Reda / Ryan Buma2-6, 6-4, 0-1
W#1 SinglesUtsav Prabhu vs Yosuke Miyashita6-2, 6-1
L#2 DoublesRavdeep Pasricha / Miroslav Spassov vs Sanjay Chopra / Joseph Carter2-6, 3-6
2024-03-24vs FC-Atreides-DayWon 20
W#1 DoublesLucio Tiberi / Rush Velcsov vs Richard Gould / Jon Hughes6-0, 6-1
W#2 DoublesFilip Mamic / Miroslav Spassov vs Wenwei Jiang / Shuang Liu6-0, 6-7, 1-0
A tie can be incomplete. Tell us if someone is missing.
i
Grouped by tie — one fixture, several lines. A line shows only when a player on it is someone we have indexed, so an early-season tie for a newly-added team can look short. This also means the line count here will not match the header, which counts individual player appearances.
Flight standings11 teams · 2.5 Men
TeamWLInd. WInd. LSets lostGames lost
1NWW-ETC-Zhao7120411129
2CAC/SL-Moon Ballers-Normile6216820177
3HBSQ-Channel Club-Rich6215924192
4ETC Tennis...etc., etc.-Tiberi5316820156
5CP-Racquet Rascals-Meyles5315923180
6WSC-Lash 2.5M44131126186
7MI-Top Guns-Knievel3571736260
8FC-Atreides-Day2661836249
9ETC-Serve-ivors-Tulga2671737238
10AYTC-The Plus Ones-Borsan1742043271
11MC-Men's 2.5-Turner0842040243

Ordered by team wins, then losses, then sets lost — the order USTA uses to seed a flight. Individual wins are lines, not ties.

See the full flight, with every team’s record

ScoutingWhere each opponent usually plays

Signed-in extra: whether this captain plays strict strength order or mixes it up, from every doubles line they have put out. Create a free account to see it.

Roster averages 2.54 estimated across 10 rated players. No lineup is published in advance, so the column below is where each player has actually been used — a captain's habits are the best available forecast. Sign in and claim your record to see who you have played.

2.90
Jianfeng Zeng
usually #1 Singles 40%, also #1 Doubles 30% · published
2.71
Utsav Prabhu
usually #1 Singles 60%, also #1 Doubles 20% · published 3
2.70
Filip Mamic
usually #2 Doubles 67%, also #1 Doubles 33% · published
2.56
Devkumar Patel
usually #2 Doubles 50%, also #1 Doubles 50% · published 3
2.55
Lucio Tiberi
usually #1 Doubles 75%, also #2 Doubles 25% · published 3
2.52
Kyle Peterson
usually #1 Doubles 100% · published
2.46
Mehrdad Mozafari
usually #2 Doubles 75%, also #1 Doubles 25% · published 2.5
2.35
Ravdeep Pasricha
usually #2 Doubles 75%, also #1 Doubles 25% · published
2.34
Miroslav Spassov
usually #2 Doubles 100% · published 2.5
2.27
Rush Velcsov
usually #1 Doubles 75%, also #2 Doubles 25% · published 2.5
Established pairs

Doubles pairs from this roster with three or more matches together anywhere — ordered by performance against what the rating gap predicted, not by record.

Miroslav Spassov + Devkumar Patel5166% games+7.0% vs expected
Miroslav Spassov + Rush Velcsov4354% games+5.4% vs expected
Rush Velcsov + Lucio Tiberi224 matchesnot enough data
Devkumar Patel + Mehrdad Mozafari213 matchesnot enough data
Roster

Ordered by our estimated dynamic rating, which is why two players at the same published level are not tied — a published 4.0 says nothing about where inside the band someone sits. Lines played in this team’s season are shown beside each name.

Jianfeng Zeng
24W–1L career · 10 lines in 2024
<1%77%23%
2.90
3
Utsav Prabhu
24W–21L career · 5 lines in 2024
6%92%2%
2.71
Filip Mamic
11W–4L career · 3 lines in 2024
8%91%2%
2.70
3
Devkumar Patel
16W–5L career · 4 lines in 2024
32%68%<1%
2.56
3
Lucio Tiberi
17W–20L career · 4 lines in 2024
37%63%<1%
2.55
Kyle Peterson
18W–16L career · 4 lines in 2024
43%57%<1%
2.52
2.5
Mehrdad Mozafari
29W–11L career · 4 lines in 2024
0%62%38%
2.46
Ravdeep Pasricha
18W–17L career · 4 lines in 2024
85%15%<1%
2.35
2.5
Miroslav Spassov
24W–26L career · 3 lines in 2024
0%88%12%
2.34
2.5
Rush Velcsov
34W–54L career · 4 lines in 2024
0%95%5%
2.27

Three percentages are where each player stands right now: the chance they are below their band, inside it, or above it, on the way they are playing this season. The number on the right is our estimated dynamic rating, which USTA never publishes. This is today rather than a forecast of December, because a forecast has to assume future matches and cannot know whether someone will even be offered them. Percentages are blank where a player has too few matches this season, or at a level where the model does not yet beat a base-rate guess; the estimate is a weaker claim than a probability and survives where those do not.

Not affiliated with or endorsed by the USTA. Ratings labelled as published are USTA year-end figures; anything we describe as an estimate is ours, not USTA’s. Match data is from USTA TennisLink.