Teams

Stamps, Anita

2023 Tri-Level 40 & Over-JXN · Women 4.0, 3.5, 3.0

12 players · average NTRP 3.17 / MISSISSIPPI

No matches recorded for this roster in this league — it may be a placeholder registration, or the season may not have started.

View scouting list →

Flight standings for Women 4.0, 3.5, 3.0 have not been collected yet. Where we have them we show every team in the flight ranked, with this team highlighted. The crawler is still filling in older seasons and flights.

ScoutingWhere each opponent usually plays

Signed-in extra: whether this captain plays strict strength order or mixes it up, from every doubles line they have put out. Create a free account to see it.

Roster averages 2.92 estimated across 7 rated players. No lineup is published in advance, so the column below is where each player has actually been used — a captain's habits are the best available forecast. Sign in and claim your record to see who you have played.

3.52
Lyrita Dale
published
3.11
ReJohnna Mitchell
published
2.87
Bertha Brookins
published 3.5
2.84
Vonda Reeves
published
2.83
Jan Woodson
published
2.78
Debra Baker
published 3
2.47
Cecilia Sawicki
published 3
Felicia Wheatley
published
Felisha Sheppard
published
Gena Standridge
published
Hollie Davis
published
Venecca Green
published
Established pairs

Doubles pairs from this roster with three or more matches together anywhere — ordered by performance against what the rating gap predicted, not by record.

Felisha Sheppard + Bertha Brookins123 matchesnot enough data
ReJohnna Mitchell + Bertha Brookins123 matchesnot enough data
ReJohnna Mitchell + Vonda Reeves033 matchesnot enough data
Bertha Brookins + Vonda Reeves123 matchesnot enough data
Roster

Ordered by our estimated dynamic rating, which is why two players at the same published level are not tied — a published 4.0 says nothing about where inside the band someone sits. Lines played in this team’s season are shown beside each name.

Lyrita Dale
4W–3L career · no lines in 2023
45%55%<1%
3.52
ReJohnna Mitchell
12W–31L career · no lines in 2023
22%78%<1%
3.11
3.5
Bertha Brookins
15W–41L career · no lines in 2023
83%17%<1%
2.87
Vonda Reeves
6W–32L career · no lines in 2023
87%13%<1%
2.84
Jan Woodson
39W–25L career · no lines in 2023
0%1%99%
2.83
3
Debra Baker
5W–3L career · no lines in 2023
2%92%6%
2.78
3
Cecilia Sawicki
4W–12L career · no lines in 2023
58%42%<1%
2.47
Felicia Wheatley
0W–8L career · no lines in 2023
not enough data
Felisha Sheppard
6W–18L career · no lines in 2023
not enough data
Gena Standridge
1W–5L career · no lines in 2023
not enough data
Hollie Davis
3W–1L career · no lines in 2023
not enough data
Venecca Green
2W–5L career · no lines in 2023
not enough data

Three percentages are where each player stands right now: the chance they are below their band, inside it, or above it, on the way they are playing this season. The number on the right is our estimated dynamic rating, which USTA never publishes. This is today rather than a forecast of December, because a forecast has to assume future matches and cannot know whether someone will even be offered them. Percentages are blank where a player has too few matches this season, or at a level where the model does not yet beat a base-rate guess; the estimate is a weaker claim than a probability and survives where those do not.

Not affiliated with or endorsed by the USTA. Ratings labelled as published are USTA year-end figures; anything we describe as an estimate is ours, not USTA’s. Match data is from USTA TennisLink.