Teams

TCU SHELTON

2025 FW Adult 18 & Over League - Ladies · Saturday Ladies 3.5

13 players · average NTRP 3.50 / TEXAS

View scouting list →
Schedule2 played
2025-04-08vs RC CAGLE/LEWISLost 01
L#2 DoublesLori Voss / Sharon Christmas vs Jessi Carder / Charlotte Norris2-6, 3-6
2025-04-01vs FWCD MULROYLost 13
W#1 DoublesBecky Connet / Kristen Wood vs Timmie DAgostino / Summer Richbourg4-6, 6-4, 1-0
L#2 DoublesCarolyn Williamson / Kathleen Jones vs Carley Cagle / Megan Eubank6-7, 1-6
L#2 SinglesCynthia Cordial vs Gina Guirola6-3, 2-6, 1-0
L#3 DoublesMaia Jourde / Kim Simpson vs Jan McKean / Shannon Mulroy2-6, 1-6
A tie can be incomplete. Tell us if someone is missing.
i
Grouped by tie — one fixture, several lines. A line shows only when a player on it is someone we have indexed, so an early-season tie for a newly-added team can look short. This also means the line count here will not match the header, which counts individual player appearances.

Flight standings for Saturday Ladies 3.5 have not been collected yet. Where we have them we show every team in the flight ranked, with this team highlighted. The crawler is still filling in older seasons and flights.

ScoutingWhere each opponent usually plays

Signed-in extra: whether this captain plays strict strength order or mixes it up, from every doubles line they have put out. Create a free account to see it.

Roster averages 3.16 estimated across 13 rated players. No lineup is published in advance, so the column below is where each player has actually been used — a captain's habits are the best available forecast. Sign in and claim your record to see who you have played.

3.46
Cynthia Cordial
usually #2 Singles 67%, also #1 Singles 33% · published 3.5
3.44
Becky Connet
usually #1 Doubles 100% · published 3.5
3.29
Sherrie Panter
published
3.26
Sharon Christmas
usually #2 Doubles 100% · published
3.14
Luming Parsley
published
3.13
Kim Simpson
usually #3 Doubles 100% · published
3.13
Sarah Weitzer
published
3.10
Beth Shelton
published 3.5
3.08
Stephanie Daniels
published
3.07
Jane Tapper
published
3.03
Carolyn Williamson
usually #2 Doubles 100% · published 3.5
2.99
Maia Jourde
usually #3 Doubles 100% · published
2.97
Irma Rodriguez
published
Established pairs

Doubles pairs from this roster with three or more matches together anywhere — ordered by performance against what the rating gap predicted, not by record.

Stephanie Daniels + Maia Jourde134 matchesnot enough data
Luming Parsley + Beth Shelton123 matchesnot enough data
Roster

Ordered by our estimated dynamic rating, which is why two players at the same published level are not tied — a published 4.0 says nothing about where inside the band someone sits. Lines played in this team’s season are shown beside each name.

3.5
Cynthia Cordial
9W–13L career · 3 lines in 2025
<1%60%40%
3.46
3.5
Becky Connet
42W–34L career · 1 line in 2025
<1%66%34%
3.44
Sherrie Panter
20W–12L career · no lines in 2025
2%91%7%
3.29
Sharon Christmas
4W–5L career · 1 line in 2025
3%93%4%
3.26
Luming Parsley
9W–17L career · no lines in 2025
16%83%<1%
3.14
Kim Simpson
7W–17L career · 1 line in 2025
18%81%<1%
3.13
Sarah Weitzer
3W–7L career · no lines in 2025
18%81%<1%
3.13
3.5
Beth Shelton
5W–10L career · no lines in 2025
25%75%<1%
3.10
Stephanie Daniels
4W–12L career · no lines in 2025
27%72%<1%
3.08
Jane Tapper
1W–4L career · no lines in 2025
32%68%<1%
3.07
3.5
Carolyn Williamson
4W–12L career · 1 line in 2025
42%58%<1%
3.03
Maia Jourde
7W–18L career · 1 line in 2025
53%47%<1%
2.99
Irma Rodriguez
1W–3L career · no lines in 2025
59%41%<1%
2.97

Three percentages are where each player stands right now: the chance they are below their band, inside it, or above it, on the way they are playing this season. The number on the right is our estimated dynamic rating, which USTA never publishes. This is today rather than a forecast of December, because a forecast has to assume future matches and cannot know whether someone will even be offered them. Percentages are blank where a player has too few matches this season, or at a level where the model does not yet beat a base-rate guess; the estimate is a weaker claim than a probability and survives where those do not.

Not affiliated with or endorsed by the USTA. Ratings labelled as published are USTA year-end figures; anything we describe as an estimate is ours, not USTA’s. Match data is from USTA TennisLink.