Teams

McPherson/LR/LRRC

2025 Adult 18 & Over Spring League 3.0,3.5,4.0 · 3.0 Women

12 players · average NTRP 3.00 / ARKANSAS

View scouting list →
Schedule5 played
2025-04-28vs Welker/NLR/BPWon 31
W#1 SinglesKaitlen Stewart vs Yan Sun7-5, 1-6, 1-0
W#2 DoublesAnne McPherson / Allison Wilkes vs Casey Lozada / Courtney Klotz6-1, 6-2
W#2 SinglesJessica Doose vs Molly Scott7-5, 6-1
L#3 DoublesHeather Larsen / Betsy Peeler vs Leah Welker / Briana Crowder3-6, 6-4, 1-0
2025-04-22vs Blackshaw/Slabaugh/LR/CCLRWon 41
L#1 DoublesAllison Wilkes / Betsy Peeler vs Melanie Prince / Casie Selig3-6, 2-5
W#1 SinglesKaitlen Stewart vs Amanda Cook6-3, 6-1
W#2 DoublesStefan Jones / Judith Heister vs Jacey Guthrie / Lauren Chandler6-3, 6-4
W#2 SinglesJessica Doose vs Heather Carter7-5, 3-1
W#3 DoublesStephanie Chester / Sarah Rolfes vs Meredith Pelton / Tracy Slabaugh7-5, 6-4
2025-04-17vs Welker/NLR/BPWon 31
L#1 DoublesJessica Doose / Amanda Gray vs Leah Welker / Elizabeth Cook3-6, 5-7
W#2 DoublesSarah Rolfes / Margaret Hughes vs Leslyn Graves / Courtney Klotz6-3, 7-6
W#2 SinglesAnne McPherson vs Jasmine Black6-1, 6-4
W#3 DoublesKaitlen Stewart / Stephanie Chester vs Ometra Okuwoash / Casey Lozada6-2, 6-2
2025-04-09vs Blackshaw/Slabaugh/LR/CCLRLost 23
L#1 DoublesHeather Larsen / Betsy Peeler vs Melanie Prince / Bailey Pollock3-6, 0-6
L#1 SinglesStephanie Chester vs Hannah Rabinowitz2-6, 0-6
W#2 DoublesJudith Heister / Amanda Gray vs Mary Nell McBryde / Suzanne Howard4-6, 6-4, 1-0
W#2 SinglesAnne McPherson vs Elizabeth Daniel6-4, 4-4
L#3 DoublesStefan Jones / Jessica Doose vs Meredith Pelton / Amanda Cook1-6, 5-2
2025-02-24vs Miller/Law/LR/PVCCLost 14
L#1 DoublesJudith Heister / Heather Larsen vs Keelen Verser / Kristin Connell3-6, 6-1, 0-1
W#1 SinglesKatie Hicks vs Rayni Bozynski6-2, 6-1
L#2 DoublesAllison Wilkes / Amanda Gray vs Karrie Miller / Sarah Mathews1-6, 2-6
L#2 SinglesJessica Doose vs Gracie Bailey4-6, 2-6
L#3 DoublesStefan Jones / Sarah Rolfes vs Lisa McKeown / Cheryl Norris4-6, 4-6
A tie can be incomplete. Tell us if someone is missing.
i
Grouped by tie — one fixture, several lines. A line shows only when a player on it is someone we have indexed, so an early-season tie for a newly-added team can look short. This also means the line count here will not match the header, which counts individual player appearances.

Flight standings for 3.0 Women have not been collected yet. Where we have them we show every team in the flight ranked, with this team highlighted. The crawler is still filling in older seasons and flights.

ScoutingWhere each opponent usually plays

Signed-in extra: whether this captain plays strict strength order or mixes it up, from every doubles line they have put out. Create a free account to see it.

Roster averages 2.84 estimated across 11 rated players. No lineup is published in advance, so the column below is where each player has actually been used — a captain's habits are the best available forecast. Sign in and claim your record to see who you have played.

3.31
Katie Hicks
usually #2 Doubles 50%, also #1 Singles 50% · published
3.01
Kaitlen Stewart
usually #1 Singles 67%, also #3 Doubles 33% · published
2.95
Allison Wilkes
usually #2 Doubles 67%, also #1 Doubles 33% · published 3
2.91
Judith Heister
usually #2 Doubles 67%, also #1 Doubles 33% · published
2.91
Jessica Doose
usually #3 Doubles 44%, also #2 Singles 33% · published
2.86
Anne McPherson
usually #2 Singles 67%, also #2 Doubles 33% · published 3
2.79
Amanda Gray
published 3
2.79
Betsy Peeler
usually #1 Doubles 67%, also #3 Doubles 33% · published 3
2.78
Heather Larsen
usually #1 Doubles 67%, also #3 Doubles 33% · published 3
2.60
Stephanie Chester
usually #3 Doubles 67%, also #1 Singles 33% · published
2.39
Sarah Rolfes
usually #3 Doubles 67%, also #2 Doubles 33% · published
Stefan Jones
published
Established pairs

Doubles pairs from this roster with three or more matches together anywhere — ordered by performance against what the rating gap predicted, not by record.

Betsy Peeler + Heather Larsen1450% gamesnot enough data
Anne McPherson + Katie Hicks303 matchesnot enough data
Allison Wilkes + Betsy Peeler213 matchesnot enough data
Roster

Ordered by our estimated dynamic rating, which is why two players at the same published level are not tied — a published 4.0 says nothing about where inside the band someone sits. Lines played in this team’s season are shown beside each name.

Katie Hicks
24W–9L career · 2 lines in 2025
1%92%7%
3.31
Kaitlen Stewart
14W–6L career · 3 lines in 2025
48%52%<1%
3.01
3
Allison Wilkes
5W–5L career · 3 lines in 2025
<1%64%36%
2.95
Judith Heister
10W–7L career · 3 lines in 2025
<1%75%25%
2.91
Jessica Doose
31W–35L career · 9 lines in 2025
<1%76%24%
2.91
3
Anne McPherson
19W–21L career · 3 lines in 2025
<1%85%15%
2.86
3
Amanda Gray
8W–5L career · no lines in 2025
1%93%5%
2.79
3
Betsy Peeler
13W–21L career · 3 lines in 2025
1%94%5%
2.79
3
Heather Larsen
14W–10L career · 3 lines in 2025
2%94%4%
2.78
Stephanie Chester
4W–10L career · 3 lines in 2025
23%77%<1%
2.60
Sarah Rolfes
5W–10L career · 3 lines in 2025
80%20%<1%
2.39
Stefan Jones
2W–5L career · no lines in 2025
not enough data

Three percentages are where each player stands right now: the chance they are below their band, inside it, or above it, on the way they are playing this season. The number on the right is our estimated dynamic rating, which USTA never publishes. This is today rather than a forecast of December, because a forecast has to assume future matches and cannot know whether someone will even be offered them. Percentages are blank where a player has too few matches this season, or at a level where the model does not yet beat a base-rate guess; the estimate is a weaker claim than a probability and survives where those do not.

Not affiliated with or endorsed by the USTA. Ratings labelled as published are USTA year-end figures; anything we describe as an estimate is ours, not USTA’s. Match data is from USTA TennisLink.