Teams

Midtown - Craig

2023 Broward Adult 55 & Over - Night · 6.0 Women

10 players · average NTRP 3.25 / REGION_8

View scouting list →
Schedule6 played
2023-03-02vs Broward/Dillon - ThomasLost 02
L#1 DoublesJuan Yang / Maritza Craig vs Huey Song / Joan Mckee2-6, 4-6
L#2 DoublesMolly Jolluck / Raquel de Jesus vs Deborah Hinson / Debra Reed0-6, 1-6
2023-03-01vs Veltri - ContrerasWon 10
W#1 DoublesSima Sadoughi / Stacy Havens vs Corina Franco / Maggie Terrazas7-6, 6-2
2023-02-09vs Broward/Dillon - ThomasSplit 11
L#1 DoublesJennifer Montgomery / Raquel de Jesus vs Huey Song / Joan Mckee3-6, 1-6
W#2 DoublesMaritza Craig / Juan Yang vs Deborah Hinson / Debra Reed6-0, 0-6, 1-0
2023-02-02vs Veltri - ContrerasWon 20
W#1 DoublesShamena Khan / Deborah Marshall vs Catharine Utvich / Bertha Ruiz6-1, 6-1
W#3 DoublesSima Sadoughi / Raquel de Jesus vs Jeanne Sierra / CATHERINE WILLIAMS6-2, 6-1
2023-01-19vs Broward/Dillon - ThomasWon 10
W#3 DoublesDeborah Marshall / Sima Sadoughi vs Leah Parodi / Catherine Thomas6-2, 6-2
2023-01-12vs Veltri - ContrerasWon 10
W#3 DoublesRaquel de Jesus / Shamena Khan vs MONICA DONATO / Lourdes Radice6-2, 5-7, 1-0
A tie can be incomplete. Tell us if someone is missing.
i
Grouped by tie — one fixture, several lines. A line shows only when a player on it is someone we have indexed, so an early-season tie for a newly-added team can look short. This also means the line count here will not match the header, which counts individual player appearances.

Flight standings for 6.0 Women have not been collected yet. Where we have them we show every team in the flight ranked, with this team highlighted. The crawler is still filling in older seasons and flights.

ScoutingWhere each opponent usually plays

Signed-in extra: whether this captain plays strict strength order or mixes it up, from every doubles line they have put out. Create a free account to see it.

Roster averages 2.95 estimated across 10 rated players. No lineup is published in advance, so the column below is where each player has actually been used — a captain's habits are the best available forecast. Sign in and claim your record to see who you have played.

3.30
Stacy Havens
published
3.15
Juan Yang
published
3.07
Raquel de Jesus
usually #3 Doubles 50%, also #1 Doubles 25% · published 3.5
3.05
Sima Sadoughi
usually #3 Doubles 67%, also #1 Doubles 33% · published 3.5
3.04
Sheryl Hurwit
published
3.01
Shamena Khan
usually #3 Doubles 50%, also #1 Doubles 50% · published 3
2.84
Maritza Craig
usually #2 Doubles 50%, also #1 Doubles 50% · published 3
2.75
Maria Diaz
published
2.73
Jennifer Montgomery
published
2.53
Janneth Ardila
published
Established pairs

Doubles pairs from this roster with three or more matches together anywhere — ordered by performance against what the rating gap predicted, not by record.

Juan Yang + Maritza Craig8269% games+16.9% vs expected
Maria Diaz + Jennifer Montgomery2343% games−1.5% vs expected
Shamena Khan + Raquel de Jesus10357% gamesnot enough data
Sima Sadoughi + Raquel de Jesus8360% gamesnot enough data
Sima Sadoughi + Maritza Craig033 matchesnot enough data
Roster

Ordered by our estimated dynamic rating, which is why two players at the same published level are not tied — a published 4.0 says nothing about where inside the band someone sits. Lines played in this team’s season are shown beside each name.

Stacy Havens
7W–5L career · no lines in 2023
2%91%8%
3.30
Juan Yang
13W–13L career · no lines in 2023
<1%15%85%
3.15
3.5
Raquel de Jesus
66W–52L career · 4 lines in 2023
31%69%<1%
3.07
3.5
Sima Sadoughi
207W–136L career · 3 lines in 2023
36%64%<1%
3.05
Sheryl Hurwit
2W–13L career · no lines in 2023
37%63%<1%
3.04
3
Shamena Khan
133W–140L career · 2 lines in 2023
<1%46%54%
3.01
3
Maritza Craig
113W–116L career · 2 lines in 2023
1%86%13%
2.84
Maria Diaz
6W–14L career · no lines in 2023
4%93%4%
2.75
Jennifer Montgomery
11W–26L career · no lines in 2023
5%92%3%
2.73
Janneth Ardila
3W–10L career · no lines in 2023
42%58%<1%
2.53

Three percentages are where each player stands right now: the chance they are below their band, inside it, or above it, on the way they are playing this season. The number on the right is our estimated dynamic rating, which USTA never publishes. This is today rather than a forecast of December, because a forecast has to assume future matches and cannot know whether someone will even be offered them. Percentages are blank where a player has too few matches this season, or at a level where the model does not yet beat a base-rate guess; the estimate is a weaker claim than a probability and survives where those do not.

Not affiliated with or endorsed by the USTA. Ratings labelled as published are USTA year-end figures; anything we describe as an estimate is ours, not USTA’s. Match data is from USTA TennisLink.