Teams

ESSON 18s 6.5 Combo W Wed PM

2024 Piedmont Combo 18 & Over · 6.5 Women 18 & Over

11 players · average NTRP 3.38 / NORTH CAROLINA

View scouting list →
Schedule5 played
2024-10-09vs Tyler/Pitts 18s 6.5 Combo W Wed PMLost 01
L#3 DoublesCarol Poling / Myra Propst vs Bridget Crump / Charley Lanza5-7, 3-6
2024-10-02vs Yates C 18s 6.5 Combo Wed PMLost 01
L#3 DoublesElia Mavronikolas / Myra Propst vs Betsy Hooper / Tara Davis6-3, 6-7, 0-1
2024-08-28vs Yates J. 18s 6.5 Combo W Wed PMLost 01
L#1 DoublesDonna Esson / Myra Propst vs Kelly Guyler / LaJean Morrow Smith6-7, 3-6
2024-08-14vs Davis/Goy 18s 6.5 Combo W Wed PMLost 01
L#2 DoublesTiffany Weeks / Myra Propst vs Melissa Gujrati / Thais Warwar1-6, 3-6
2024-08-07vs Flanagan 18s 6.5 Combo W Wed PMLost 01
L#1 DoublesTammy Dunn / Myra Propst vs Laura Loftin / Emily Wilson4-6, 7-5, 0-1
A tie can be incomplete. Tell us if someone is missing.
i
Grouped by tie — one fixture, several lines. A line shows only when a player on it is someone we have indexed, so an early-season tie for a newly-added team can look short. This also means the line count here will not match the header, which counts individual player appearances.

Flight standings for 6.5 Women 18 & Over have not been collected yet. Where we have them we show every team in the flight ranked, with this team highlighted. The crawler is still filling in older seasons and flights.

ScoutingWhere each opponent usually plays

Signed-in extra: whether this captain plays strict strength order or mixes it up, from every doubles line they have put out. Create a free account to see it.

Roster averages 2.90 estimated across 11 rated players. No lineup is published in advance, so the column below is where each player has actually been used — a captain's habits are the best available forecast. Sign in and claim your record to see who you have played.

3.37
Maria Pincus
published
3.10
Philia Leach
published
3.09
Tiffany Weeks
published
3.08
Elia Mavronikolas
published 3.5
3.07
Donna Esson
published 3.5
3.00
Tammy Dunn
published
2.93
Carol Poling
published 3.5
2.69
Linda Widman
published
2.65
Myra Propst
usually #1 Doubles 40%, also #3 Doubles 40% · published
2.60
Renuka Shivaji
published
2.35
Donna Dufour
published 3
Established pairs

Doubles pairs from this roster with three or more matches together anywhere — ordered by performance against what the rating gap predicted, not by record.

Tiffany Weeks + Donna Esson3740% games−2.3% vs expected
Tammy Dunn + Maria Pincus1447% games−7.6% vs expected
Donna Esson + Philia Leach134 matchesnot enough data
Donna Esson + Renuka Shivaji033 matchesnot enough data
Roster

Ordered by our estimated dynamic rating, which is why two players at the same published level are not tied — a published 4.0 says nothing about where inside the band someone sits. Lines played in this team’s season are shown beside each name.

Maria Pincus
11W–10L career · no lines in 2024
<1%84%16%
3.37
Philia Leach
25W–22L career · no lines in 2024
<1%22%78%
3.10
Tiffany Weeks
11W–28L career · no lines in 2024
25%75%<1%
3.09
3.5
Elia Mavronikolas
27W–42L career · type A · no lines in 2024
27%73%<1%
3.08
3.5
Donna Esson
10W–29L career · no lines in 2024
30%70%<1%
3.07
Tammy Dunn
5W–10L career · no lines in 2024
49%51%<1%
3.00
3.5
Carol Poling
14W–18L career · no lines in 2024
72%28%<1%
2.93
Linda Widman
7W–15L career · no lines in 2024
7%92%1%
2.69
Myra Propst
147W–178L career · 5 lines in 2024
12%88%<1%
2.65
Renuka Shivaji
8W–20L career · no lines in 2024
21%78%<1%
2.60
3
Donna Dufour
1W–4L career · no lines in 2024
88%12%<1%
2.35

Three percentages are where each player stands right now: the chance they are below their band, inside it, or above it, on the way they are playing this season. The number on the right is our estimated dynamic rating, which USTA never publishes. This is today rather than a forecast of December, because a forecast has to assume future matches and cannot know whether someone will even be offered them. Percentages are blank where a player has too few matches this season, or at a level where the model does not yet beat a base-rate guess; the estimate is a weaker claim than a probability and survives where those do not.

Not affiliated with or endorsed by the USTA. Ratings labelled as published are USTA year-end figures; anything we describe as an estimate is ours, not USTA’s. Match data is from USTA TennisLink.