Teams

*4-JByrd-Eno

2024 Eno River Adult 18 & Over · 18 & Over Adult 5.0 Men Evening

5 players · average NTRP 4.75 / NORTH CAROLINA

View scouting list →
Schedule8 played
2024-05-07vs *2-MHanauer-EnoWon 20
W#1 DoublesBrett Eckles / Justin Panepinto vs Spencer Llewellyn / Davis Humphries6-3, 6-2
W#1 SinglesAndres Carro vs Zack Czajkowski6-0, 6-1
2024-04-30vs *3-MNicholson-HRWon 30
W#1 DoublesLoic Didavi / Brett Eckles vs Ben Cooke / Mike Larson3-6, 6-3, 1-0
W#1 SinglesAndres Carro vs Robert Lightbourn7-5, 4-6, 1-0
W#2 DoublesPeter Hull / Justin Panepinto vs Garrett May / Derek Wildman7-5, 4-6, 1-0
2024-04-10vs *5-GGisler-CHTCWon 20
W#1 DoublesLoic Didavi / Justin Panepinto vs Julien de la Mettrie / Christopher Fletcher6-3, 6-4
W#2 DoublesPeter Hull / Andres Carro vs Brian Smith / Nicholas Camilleri6-4, 6-1
2024-03-26vs *1-JHull-EnoWon 10
W#2 DoublesPeter Hull / Brett Eckles vs Parker Sheridan / Nick Brittis6-4, 6-4
2024-03-19vs *2-MHanauer-EnoWon 10
W#1 DoublesAndres Carro / Daniel Hall vs Zack Czajkowski / Spencer Llewellyn6-3, 3-6, 1-0
2024-03-18Lost 01
L#1 DoublesAndres Carro / Justin Panepinto vs Brian Rosenthal / Brian Smith6-4, 1-6, 0-1
2024-03-12vs *3-MNicholson-HRLost 02
L#1 DoublesAndres Carro / Justin Panepinto vs William Heim / Garrett May4-6, 7-5, 0-1
L#2 DoublesLoic Didavi / Brett Eckles vs Herman Naftel / Matthew Nicholson1-6, 6-3, 0-1
2024-02-20vs *1-JHull-EnoWon 10
W#1 DoublesAndres Carro / Justin Panepinto vs Connor Wilkins / Richard Papantonis7-5, 6-1
A tie can be incomplete. Tell us if someone is missing.
i
Grouped by tie — one fixture, several lines. A line shows only when a player on it is someone we have indexed, so an early-season tie for a newly-added team can look short. This also means the line count here will not match the header, which counts individual player appearances.

Flight standings for 18 & Over Adult 5.0 Men Evening have not been collected yet. Where we have them we show every team in the flight ranked, with this team highlighted. The crawler is still filling in older seasons and flights.

ScoutingWhere each opponent usually plays

Signed-in extra: whether this captain plays strict strength order or mixes it up, from every doubles line they have put out. Create a free account to see it.

Roster averages 4.50 estimated across 4 rated players. No lineup is published in advance, so the column below is where each player has actually been used — a captain's habits are the best available forecast. Sign in and claim your record to see who you have played.

4.88
Andres Carro
usually #1 Doubles 57%, also #1 Singles 29% · published 5
Justin Panepinto
usually #1 Doubles 83%, also #2 Doubles 17% · published 5
4.64
Loic Didavi
published
4.43
Brett Eckles
usually #2 Doubles 36%, also #3 Doubles 18% · published 4.5
4.04
Jermaine Byrd
usually #1 Doubles 60%, also #3 Doubles 20% · published 4.5
Established pairs

Doubles pairs from this roster with three or more matches together anywhere — ordered by performance against what the rating gap predicted, not by record.

Andres Carro + Brett Eckles8260% gamesnot enough data
Andres Carro + Justin Panepinto5359% gamesnot enough data
Jermaine Byrd + Brett Eckles3255% gamesnot enough data
Roster

Ordered by our estimated dynamic rating, which is why two players at the same published level are not tied — a published 4.0 says nothing about where inside the band someone sits. Lines played in this team’s season are shown beside each name.

5
Andres Carro
90W–20L career · 7 lines in 2024
no projection at this level
4.88
5
Justin Panepinto
46W–40L career · 6 lines in 2024
not enough data
Loic Didavi
4W–0L career · no lines in 2024
no projection at this level
4.64
4.5
Brett Eckles
223W–95L career · 10 lines in 2024
<1%69%31%
4.43
4.5
Jermaine Byrd
135W–127L career · 5 lines in 2024
37%63%<1%
4.04

Three percentages are where each player stands right now: the chance they are below their band, inside it, or above it, on the way they are playing this season. The number on the right is our estimated dynamic rating, which USTA never publishes. This is today rather than a forecast of December, because a forecast has to assume future matches and cannot know whether someone will even be offered them. Percentages are blank where a player has too few matches this season, or at a level where the model does not yet beat a base-rate guess; the estimate is a weaker claim than a probability and survives where those do not.

Not affiliated with or endorsed by the USTA. Ratings labelled as published are USTA year-end figures; anything we describe as an estimate is ours, not USTA’s. Match data is from USTA TennisLink.