MC GREEN
2022 USTA MIXED 40 & OVER - DEN · MIXED 7.0 - 40 & OVER
12 players · average NTRP 3.50 / COLORADO
No matches recorded for this roster in this league — it may be a placeholder registration, or the season may not have started.
Schedule7 played
i
Flight standings28 teams · MIXED 7.0 - 40 & OVER
| Team | W | L | Sets lost | Games lost |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1LTC RED | 7 | 0 | 8 | 147 |
| 2BTA GREEN | 7 | 0 | 12 | 175 |
| 3KNO BLUE | 6 | 1 | 13 | 151 |
| 4LTFC PURPLE | 6 | 1 | 15 | 160 |
| 5PH BLUE | 6 | 1 | 19 | 149 |
| 6SSH GREEN | 5 | 2 | 20 | 153 |
| 7MC GREEN | 5 | 2 | 22 | 169 |
| 8LTA NAVY | 4 | 3 | 16 | 182 |
| 9LEBTC TEAL | 4 | 3 | 20 | 184 |
| 10SSLT RED | 4 | 3 | 22 | 161 |
| 11PRC GREEN | 4 | 3 | 25 | 208 |
| 12HRCA GREEN | 4 | 3 | 26 | 204 |
| 13PRC NAVY | 3 | 4 | 22 | 177 |
| 14MEA BLUE | 3 | 4 | 27 | 203 |
| 15CVTA GREEN | 3 | 4 | 28 | 191 |
| 16RMTC BLUE | 3 | 4 | 28 | 209 |
| 17LTA BLUE | 2 | 5 | 27 | 207 |
| 18MEA GREEN | 2 | 5 | 29 | 221 |
| 19CK BLUE | 2 | 5 | 29 | 195 |
| 20MC BLUE | 2 | 5 | 30 | 203 |
| 21CPV GREEN | 2 | 5 | 30 | 226 |
| 22HIW BLUE | 2 | 5 | 31 | 215 |
| 23CVTA BLUE | 2 | 5 | 31 | 216 |
| 24EM BLUE | 2 | 5 | 31 | 220 |
| 25HG TEAL | 2 | 5 | 32 | 226 |
| 26PH RED | 2 | 5 | 32 | 222 |
| 27BP BLUE | 1 | 6 | 31 | 219 |
| 28CK RED | 0 | 7 | 34 | 216 |
Ordered by team wins, then losses, then sets lost — the order USTA uses to seed a flight. Individual wins are lines, not ties.
ScoutingWhere each opponent usually plays
Signed-in extra: whether this captain plays strict strength order or mixes it up, from every doubles line they have put out. Create a free account to see it.
Roster averages 3.32 estimated across 11 rated players. No lineup is published in advance, so the column below is where each player has actually been used — a captain's habits are the best available forecast. Sign in and claim your record to see who you have played.
Doubles pairs from this roster with three or more matches together anywhere — ordered by performance against what the rating gap predicted, not by record.
| Sue Hickey + Brad Nash | 8–1 | 56% games | +12.0% vs expected |
| Ellen Sprague + Brad Nash | 4–5 | 49% games | +9.6% vs expected |
| Charles Sprague + Sue Hickey | 3–6 | 43% games | −2.3% vs expected |
| Charles Sprague + Ellen Sprague | 9–14 | 47% games | −7.4% vs expected |
| Chris Billinger + Patricia Billinger | 0–10 | 34% games | −11.5% vs expected |
| Ann Rhoads + Charles Sprague | 1–3 | 4 matches | not enough data |
| Ana Hunsinger + Brad Nash | 4–0 | 4 matches | not enough data |
| Charles Sprague + Patricia Billinger | 3–0 | 3 matches | not enough data |
Ordered by our estimated dynamic rating, which is why two players at the same published level are not tied — a published 4.0 says nothing about where inside the band someone sits. Lines played in this team’s season are shown beside each name.
Three percentages are where each player stands right now: the chance they are below their band, inside it, or above it, on the way they are playing this season. The number on the right is our estimated dynamic rating, which USTA never publishes. This is today rather than a forecast of December, because a forecast has to assume future matches and cannot know whether someone will even be offered them. Percentages are blank where a player has too few matches this season, or at a level where the model does not yet beat a base-rate guess; the estimate is a weaker claim than a probability and survives where those do not.
Not affiliated with or endorsed by the USTA. Ratings labelled as published are USTA year-end figures; anything we describe as an estimate is ours, not USTA’s. Match data is from USTA TennisLink.