Teams

Smith/Nashville

2026 Mixed 65 & Over - Nashville · 4.0 Mixed - Saturday

7 players · average NTRP / TENNESSEE

View scouting list →
Schedule5 played
2026-07-11vs Hollis/Whitson/NashvilleWon 20
W#1 DoublesGlenda Jordan / Steven Anderson vs John Kreis / Merrily Gibney2-6, 7-6, 1-0
W#2 DoublesRoger Fuhrman / Lolo Fuhrman vs Albert Whitson / Celia Turner6-1, 6-3
2026-06-27vs Hollis/Whitson/NashvilleLost 12
L#1 DoublesSteve Smith / Julie Shaub vs Robert Ward / Venessa Seivers2-6, 4-6
W#2 DoublesRob Rogers / Venette Stack vs Debbi Booton / Jack Vandercook7-6, 6-2
L#3 DoublesRoger Fuhrman / Lolo Fuhrman vs John Kreis / Merrily Gibney2-2
2026-06-20vs Hollis/Whitson/NashvilleLost 03
L#1 DoublesMike Burkhart / Joni Covington vs Jack Vandercook / Debbi Booton5-7, 1-6
L#2 DoublesSteven Anderson / Julie Shaub vs Daniel Hayes / Barbara Hooper2-6, 2-6
L#3 DoublesRoger Fuhrman / Glenda Jordan vs John Kreis / Merrily Gibney3-6, 6-4, 0-1
2026-06-13vs Hollis/Whitson/NashvilleWon 21
L#1 DoublesNorman Moore / Glenda Jordan vs Daniel Hayes / Celia Turner3-6, 6-4, 1-0
W#2 DoublesMike Burkhart / Joni Covington vs Jane Barnes-Tilford / Salvador Barajas6-3, 6-4
W#3 DoublesRob Rogers / Venette Stack vs John Kreis / Nita Hollis7-5, 7-6
2026-06-06vs Hollis/Whitson/NashvilleWon 21
L#1 DoublesNorman Moore / Joni Covington vs Barbara Hooper / Daniel Hayes6-7, 6-3, 0-1
W#2 DoublesRob Rogers / Venette Stack vs Salvador Barajas / Jane Barnes-Tilford6-2, 7-6
W#3 DoublesRoger Fuhrman / Lolo Fuhrman vs Jack Vandercook / Venessa Seivers6-2, 6-4
A tie can be incomplete. Tell us if someone is missing.
i
Grouped by tie — one fixture, several lines. A line shows only when a player on it is someone we have indexed, so an early-season tie for a newly-added team can look short. This also means the line count here will not match the header, which counts individual player appearances.
Flight standings2 teams · 4.0 Mixed - Saturday
TeamWLInd. WInd. LSets lostGames lost
1Smith/Nashville327815139
2Hollis/Whitson/Nashville238717135

Ordered by team wins, then losses, then sets lost — the order USTA uses to seed a flight. Individual wins are lines, not ties.

See the full flight, with every team’s record

ScoutingWhere each opponent usually plays

Signed-in extra: whether this captain plays strict strength order or mixes it up, from every doubles line they have put out. Create a free account to see it.

Roster averages 3.70 estimated across 7 rated players. No lineup is published in advance, so the column below is where each player has actually been used — a captain's habits are the best available forecast. Sign in and claim your record to see who you have played.

3.91
Glenda Jordan
usually #1 Doubles 67%, also #3 Doubles 33% · published
3.91
Lolo Fuhrman
usually #3 Doubles 67%, also #2 Doubles 33% · published
3.77
Roger Fuhrman
usually #3 Doubles 75%, also #2 Doubles 25% · published
3.66
Joni Covington
usually #1 Doubles 67%, also #2 Doubles 33% · published
3.58
Norman Moore
usually #1 Doubles 100% · published
3.56
Julie Shaub
usually #2 Doubles 50%, also #1 Doubles 50% · published
3.48
Venette Stack
usually #2 Doubles 67%, also #3 Doubles 33% · published
Established pairs

Doubles pairs from this roster with three or more matches together anywhere — ordered by performance against what the rating gap predicted, not by record.

Lolo Fuhrman + Roger Fuhrman213 matchesnot enough data
Roster

Ordered by our estimated dynamic rating, which is why two players at the same published level are not tied — a published 4.0 says nothing about where inside the band someone sits. Lines played in this team’s season are shown beside each name.

Glenda Jordan
14W–7L career · 3 lines in 2026
<1%73%27%
3.91
Lolo Fuhrman
21W–6L career · 3 lines in 2026
<1%73%27%
3.91
Roger Fuhrman
5W–8L career · 4 lines in 2026
3%92%5%
3.77
Joni Covington
19W–18L career · 3 lines in 2026
13%86%1%
3.66
Norman Moore
3W–5L career · 2 lines in 2026
27%73%<1%
3.58
Julie Shaub
11W–13L career · 2 lines in 2026
33%67%<1%
3.56
Venette Stack
7W–8L career · 3 lines in 2026
54%46%<1%
3.48

Three percentages are where each player stands right now: the chance they are below their band, inside it, or above it, on the way they are playing this season. The number on the right is our estimated dynamic rating, which USTA never publishes. This is today rather than a forecast of December, because a forecast has to assume future matches and cannot know whether someone will even be offered them. Percentages are blank where a player has too few matches this season, or at a level where the model does not yet beat a base-rate guess; the estimate is a weaker claim than a probability and survives where those do not.

Not affiliated with or endorsed by the USTA. Ratings labelled as published are USTA year-end figures; anything we describe as an estimate is ours, not USTA’s. Match data is from USTA TennisLink.