Teams

Salazar

Combo · 6.5 Ladies

7 players · average NTRP 3.50 / TEXAS

View scouting list →
Schedule5 played
2026-08-27vs BoggsLost 03
L#1 DoublesKindahl Jackson / Lynn Jackson vs Adrienne Richards / Becky Kerby1-6, 1-6
L#2 DoublesNatasha Newman / Calli Salazar vs Kelly Welch / Leslie Morgan1-6, 4-6
L#3 DoublesCharla Showalter / Lingxi Xu vs Jami Broussard / Cody Boggs6-4, 2-6, 0-1
2026-08-24vs BoggsLost 02
L#1 DoublesCalli Salazar / Lingxi Xu vs Leslie Morgan / Cassie Polk0-6, 0-6
L#2 DoublesCharla Showalter / Natasha Newman vs Adrienne Richards / Becky Kerby1-6, 2-6
2026-08-17vs ShewmakeLost 02
L#1 DoublesCalli Salazar / Lingxi Xu vs Kim Shewmake / Sydney Farris4-6, 6-7
L#3 DoublesTorri Hatch / Melanie Baird vs Elvira Cruz / Jera Gentry2-6, 4-6
2026-08-10vs Ballou/McNeilLost 03
L#1 DoublesCalli Salazar / Natasha Newman vs Aaron Gray / Emma Veld3-6, 4-6
L#2 DoublesLynn Jackson / Charla Showalter vs Alanna Mcneill / Katie Kamper1-6, 1-6
L#3 DoublesMelanie Baird / Lingxi Xu vs Amy Wimmers / Katie Crump1-6, 5-7
2026-08-03vs MejiaLost 12
W#1 DoublesCalli Salazar / Natasha Newman vs Noelle Flores / Raegan Boren6-4, 6-4
L#2 DoublesCharla Showalter / Lingxi Xu vs Holly Carter / Jennifer Shaw4-6, 4-6
L#3 DoublesTorri Hatch / Teresa Popp vs Emily Jenkins / Whitney Reinke4-6, 6-4, 0-1
A tie can be incomplete. Tell us if someone is missing.
i
Grouped by tie — one fixture, several lines. A line shows only when a player on it is someone we have indexed, so an early-season tie for a newly-added team can look short. This also means the line count here will not match the header, which counts individual player appearances.
Flight standings4 teams · 6.5 Ladies
TeamWLInd. WInd. LSets lostGames lost
1Ballou/McNeil2163663
2Shewmake1142549
3Mejia1133764
4Salazar031816105

Ordered by team wins, then losses, then sets lost — the order USTA uses to seed a flight. Individual wins are lines, not ties.

See the full flight, with every team’s record

ScoutingWhere each opponent usually plays

Signed-in extra: whether this captain plays strict strength order or mixes it up, from every doubles line they have put out. Create a free account to see it.

Roster averages 3.03 estimated across 7 rated players. No lineup is published in advance, so the column below is where each player has actually been used — a captain's habits are the best available forecast. Sign in and claim your record to see who you have played.

3.27
Kindahl Jackson
usually #1 Doubles 100% · published
3.13
Calli Salazar
usually #1 Doubles 80%, also #2 Doubles 20% · published 3.5
3.08
Natasha Newman
usually #1 Doubles 50%, also #2 Doubles 50% · published
3.01
Charla Showalter
usually #2 Doubles 75%, also #3 Doubles 25% · published 3.5
2.92
Torri Hatch
usually #3 Doubles 100% · published
2.90
Teresa Popp
usually #2 Doubles 50%, also #3 Doubles 50% · published
2.88
Lingxi Xu
usually #1 Doubles 57%, also #3 Doubles 29% · published
Established pairs

Doubles pairs from this roster with three or more matches together anywhere — ordered by performance against what the rating gap predicted, not by record.

Charla Showalter + Kindahl Jackson044 matchesnot enough data
Natasha Newman + Calli Salazar123 matchesnot enough data
Roster

Ordered by our estimated dynamic rating, which is why two players at the same published level are not tied — a published 4.0 says nothing about where inside the band someone sits. Lines played in this team’s season are shown beside each name.

Kindahl Jackson
4W–16L career · 1 line in 2026
3%92%5%
3.27
3.5
Calli Salazar
2W–10L career · type S · 5 lines in 2026
18%82%<1%
3.13
Natasha Newman
16W–21L career · 4 lines in 2026
<1%29%71%
3.08
3.5
Charla Showalter
6W–30L career · 4 lines in 2026
47%53%<1%
3.01
Torri Hatch
11W–25L career · 2 lines in 2026
71%29%<1%
2.92
Teresa Popp
6W–11L career · 2 lines in 2026
<1%77%23%
2.90
Lingxi Xu
5W–12L career · 7 lines in 2026
<1%80%20%
2.88

Three percentages are where each player stands right now: the chance they are below their band, inside it, or above it, on the way they are playing this season. The number on the right is our estimated dynamic rating, which USTA never publishes. This is today rather than a forecast of December, because a forecast has to assume future matches and cannot know whether someone will even be offered them. Percentages are blank where a player has too few matches this season, or at a level where the model does not yet beat a base-rate guess; the estimate is a weaker claim than a probability and survives where those do not.

Not affiliated with or endorsed by the USTA. Ratings labelled as published are USTA year-end figures; anything we describe as an estimate is ours, not USTA’s. Match data is from USTA TennisLink.