Teams

MLLVA-Bartolucci/River Run 18+ 3.0 MX

2024 Lake 18 & Over Mixed Doubles · Mixed 3.0 Wed pm 18+

8 players · average NTRP 2.92 / NORTH CAROLINA

View scouting list →
Schedule6 played
2024-07-31vs LWGO-Goodwin/CSD 3.0 18 Wed MWon 10
W#3 DoublesLisa Bartolucci / Casey Bartolucci vs Heather MacFadyen / Chuck Geer6-4, 7-5
2024-07-24vs MLCPetrasko/ PAC MIXED 18 3.0Won 10
W#3 DoublesJeffrey Zeckser / Nicole Zeckser vs Gwen Petrasko / Justin Murphy7-6, 6-1
2024-07-10vs MLMP-Palomeque/ WP 18+ MXLost 02
L#1 DoublesNicole Zeckser / Jeffrey Zeckser vs Katie Pendergast / Josh Henley3-6, 2-6
L#2 DoublesNick Straiter / Kate Straiter vs Madelyn Palomeque / Alex Palomeque5-7, 3-6
2024-06-26vs MLBK-King/Jetton 18+ MXLost 01
L#2 DoublesKate Straiter / Nick Straiter vs Larry McCrary / Melinda Little1-6, 4-6
2024-06-12vs MLGCHast/WP - 18+ 3.0 MXLost 01
L#3 DoublesLisa Bartolucci / Casey Bartolucci vs Kristen Rogers / George Chast4-6, 3-6
2024-06-05vs MLCOR-ORR/CSD 18+ 3.0 MXLost 12
L#1 DoublesLisa Bartolucci / Casey Bartolucci vs Henrik Gade / Jessica Carilli5-7, 1-6
L#2 DoublesKate Straiter / Nick Straiter vs Aiden Orr / Alyssa Deiulio2-6, 3-6
W#3 DoublesJeffrey Zeckser / Nicole Zeckser vs Nancy Bessler / Alan Dorris6-1, 6-1
A tie can be incomplete. Tell us if someone is missing.
i
Grouped by tie — one fixture, several lines. A line shows only when a player on it is someone we have indexed, so an early-season tie for a newly-added team can look short. This also means the line count here will not match the header, which counts individual player appearances.

Flight standings for Mixed 3.0 Wed pm 18+ have not been collected yet. Where we have them we show every team in the flight ranked, with this team highlighted. The crawler is still filling in older seasons and flights.

ScoutingWhere each opponent usually plays

Signed-in extra: whether this captain plays strict strength order or mixes it up, from every doubles line they have put out. Create a free account to see it.

Roster averages 2.83 estimated across 6 rated players. No lineup is published in advance, so the column below is where each player has actually been used — a captain's habits are the best available forecast. Sign in and claim your record to see who you have played.

3.27
Lisa Bartolucci
usually #3 Doubles 67%, also #1 Doubles 33% · published 3
3.18
Casey Bartolucci
usually #3 Doubles 67%, also #1 Doubles 33% · published 3
2.81
Nicole Zeckser
usually #3 Doubles 67%, also #1 Doubles 33% · published 3
2.75
Crissie Abell
published 3
2.74
Kate Straiter
usually #2 Doubles 100% · published 3
2.22
Chris Clunie
published 2.5
Lauren Clunie
published
Marty Ryan
published
Established pairs

Doubles pairs from this roster with three or more matches together anywhere — ordered by performance against what the rating gap predicted, not by record.

Lisa Bartolucci + Casey Bartolucci101348% games−6.2% vs expected
Lauren Clunie + Chris Clunie123 matchesnot enough data
Roster

Ordered by our estimated dynamic rating, which is why two players at the same published level are not tied — a published 4.0 says nothing about where inside the band someone sits. Lines played in this team’s season are shown beside each name.

3
Lisa Bartolucci
97W–51L career · 3 lines in 2024
<1%3%97%
3.27
3
Casey Bartolucci
11W–15L career · type S · 3 lines in 2024
<1%10%90%
3.18
3
Nicole Zeckser
22W–15L career · 3 lines in 2024
1%90%9%
2.81
3
Crissie Abell
3W–11L career · no lines in 2024
3%93%4%
2.75
3
Kate Straiter
32W–33L career · 3 lines in 2024
4%93%3%
2.74
2.5
Chris Clunie
1W–2L career · type M · no lines in 2024
0%98%2%
2.22
Lauren Clunie
1W–2L career · no lines in 2024
not enough data
Marty Ryan
0W–2L career · no lines in 2024
not enough data

Three percentages are where each player stands right now: the chance they are below their band, inside it, or above it, on the way they are playing this season. The number on the right is our estimated dynamic rating, which USTA never publishes. This is today rather than a forecast of December, because a forecast has to assume future matches and cannot know whether someone will even be offered them. Percentages are blank where a player has too few matches this season, or at a level where the model does not yet beat a base-rate guess; the estimate is a weaker claim than a probability and survives where those do not.

Not affiliated with or endorsed by the USTA. Ratings labelled as published are USTA year-end figures; anything we describe as an estimate is ours, not USTA’s. Match data is from USTA TennisLink.