Teams

KY/LOU/Underhill/Bowling

2025 USTA TRI-LEVEL 18 & OVER ADULT · Women's 4.0, 3.5, 3.0

17 players · average NTRP 3.50 / KENTUCKY

No matches recorded for this roster in this league — it may be a placeholder registration, or the season may not have started.

View scouting list →
Schedule9 played
2025-08-06vs KY/LOU/PolterSplit 11
L#2 DoublesLindsey Underhill / Ashley Wilhem vs Julianne Powell-Sutton / Sandra McCaffrey2-6, 6-7
W#3 DoublesTatiane Cavallazzi / Lynn Supple vs Christine Montgomery / Shin Kang6-3, 6-0
2025-07-22vs KY/LOU/PolterWon 21
W#1 DoublesMary Beth Zarobsky / Cara Robinson vs Sandra McCaffrey / Whitney Barnes7-5, 6-0
W#2 DoublesAmber Bowling / Kara Cook vs Julianne Powell-Sutton / Kelli Krueger6-1, 7-5
L#3 DoublesMeg Coomes / Elizabeth Austin vs Mechelle Kaufman / Shin Kang5-7, 7-6, 0-1
2025-07-19vs KY/LOU/Jones/WilliamsSplit 11
W#2 DoublesAmber Bowling / Kara Cook vs Elizabeth Williams / Dolores Radasch6-4, 6-7, 1-0
L#3 DoublesMeg Coomes / Elizabeth Austin vs Allison Morris / Lashae Higdon6-7, 4-6
2025-07-10vs KY/LOU/SchutzLost 03
L#1 DoublesKate Weber / Abbey Heird vs Kimberly Kim / Tracey Risk4-6, 3-6
L#2 DoublesLindsey Underhill / Cassie Stokes vs Aiysha Billings / Candace Rogers2-6, 1-6
L#3 DoublesMeg Coomes / Tatiane Cavallazzi vs Abigail Stewart / Jennifer Jorden4-6, 1-6
2025-06-27vs KY/LOU/Morris/RechterWon 10
W#3 DoublesMeg Coomes / Elizabeth Austin vs Debbie Widman / Kim Riley6-4, 6-4
2025-06-16vs KY/LOU/Jones/WilliamsLost 02
L#1 DoublesMeg Coomes / Elizabeth Austin vs Heather Hise / Elizabeth Williams1-6, 6-2, 1-0
L#2 DoublesKate Weber / Tatiane Cavallazzi vs Anne Grove / Sarah Wilson7-6, 4-6, 0-1
2025-06-09vs KY/LOU/SchutzLost 12
W#1 DoublesCara Robinson / Katie Dudas vs Rebekah Cansler / Laura Haara6-0, 6-0
L#2 DoublesCassie Stokes / Kate Weber vs Michele Horn / Staci Fountain2-6, 5-7
L#3 DoublesCarrie Ehrhard / Elizabeth Austin vs Alexandra Deal / Abigail Stewart3-6, 1-6
2025-06-03vs KY/LOU/OConnell/VossLost 03
L#1 DoublesMary Beth Zarobsky / Cara Robinson vs Lauren Whitsell / Jennifer Knific6-3, 2-6, 1-0
L#2 DoublesKara Cook / Cassie Stokes vs Katherine Willis / Shelby Russell2-6, 3-6
L#3 DoublesMeg Coomes / Tatiane Cavallazzi vs Janna Flowers / Sarah Saddemi4-6, 3-6
2025-05-22vs KY/LOU/Morris/RechterLost 02
L#2 DoublesLindsey Underhill / Amber Bowling vs Ciara Warren / Heather Lentz2-6, 2-6
L#3 DoublesMeg Coomes / Elizabeth Austin vs Kim Riley / Ashley Johnson6-2, 6-7, 0-1
A tie can be incomplete. Tell us if someone is missing.
i
Grouped by tie — one fixture, several lines. A line shows only when a player on it is someone we have indexed, so an early-season tie for a newly-added team can look short. This also means the line count here will not match the header, which counts individual player appearances.

Flight standings for Women's 4.0, 3.5, 3.0 have not been collected yet. Where we have them we show every team in the flight ranked, with this team highlighted. The crawler is still filling in older seasons and flights.

ScoutingWhere each opponent usually plays

Signed-in extra: whether this captain plays strict strength order or mixes it up, from every doubles line they have put out. Create a free account to see it.

Roster averages 3.33 estimated across 16 rated players. No lineup is published in advance, so the column below is where each player has actually been used — a captain's habits are the best available forecast. Sign in and claim your record to see who you have played.

3.93
Cara Robinson
usually #1 Doubles 100% · published 4
3.82
Mary Beth Zarobsky
usually #1 Doubles 100% · published
3.82
Elizabeth Bowling
published
3.82
Katie Dudas
usually #1 Doubles 100% · published
3.51
Kate Weber
usually #2 Doubles 67%, also #1 Doubles 33% · published
3.38
Abbey Heird
usually #1 Doubles 100% · published 3.5
3.38
Amber Bowling
usually #2 Doubles 100% · published 3.5
3.29
Ashley Wilhem
usually #2 Doubles 100% · published 3.5
3.23
Lindsey Underhill
usually #2 Doubles 100% · published
3.21
Kara Cook
usually #2 Doubles 100% · published
3.20
Carey Goldstein
published 3.5
3.20
Cassie Stokes
usually #2 Doubles 100% · published 3.5
3.00
Lynn Supple
usually #3 Doubles 100% · published
3.00
Tatiane Cavallazzi
usually #3 Doubles 75%, also #2 Doubles 25% · published
2.81
Carrie Ehrhard
usually #3 Doubles 100% · published 3
2.75
Meg Coomes
usually #3 Doubles 86%, also #1 Doubles 14% · published
Melanie Abrams
published
Established pairs

Doubles pairs from this roster with three or more matches together anywhere — ordered by performance against what the rating gap predicted, not by record.

Mary Beth Zarobsky + Cara Robinson314 matchesnot enough data
Kate Weber + Abbey Heird123 matchesnot enough data
Roster

Ordered by our estimated dynamic rating, which is why two players at the same published level are not tied — a published 4.0 says nothing about where inside the band someone sits. Lines played in this team’s season are shown beside each name.

4
Cara Robinson
28W–19L career · 3 lines in 2025
<1%68%32%
3.93
Mary Beth Zarobsky
23W–9L career · 2 lines in 2025
1%89%10%
3.82
Elizabeth Bowling
14W–7L career · no lines in 2025
1%89%10%
3.82
Katie Dudas
12W–5L career · 2 lines in 2025
1%89%9%
3.82
Kate Weber
5W–13L career · 3 lines in 2025
47%53%<1%
3.51
3.5
Abbey Heird
15W–15L career · 1 line in 2025
<1%80%20%
3.38
3.5
Amber Bowling
20W–15L career · 3 lines in 2025
<1%80%20%
3.38
3.5
Ashley Wilhem
6W–5L career · 1 line in 2025
2%92%6%
3.29
Lindsey Underhill
9W–19L career · 3 lines in 2025
5%92%3%
3.23
Kara Cook
10W–14L career · 3 lines in 2025
7%91%2%
3.21
3.5
Carey Goldstein
7W–11L career · no lines in 2025
8%91%2%
3.20
3.5
Cassie Stokes
7W–9L career · 3 lines in 2025
8%91%2%
3.20
Lynn Supple
9W–4L career · 1 line in 2025
<1%51%49%
3.00
Tatiane Cavallazzi
17W–14L career · 4 lines in 2025
<1%51%49%
3.00
3
Carrie Ehrhard
15W–20L career · 1 line in 2025
1%90%9%
2.81
Meg Coomes
17W–22L career · 7 lines in 2025
3%93%4%
2.75
Melanie Abrams
1W–4L career · no lines in 2025
not enough data

Three percentages are where each player stands right now: the chance they are below their band, inside it, or above it, on the way they are playing this season. The number on the right is our estimated dynamic rating, which USTA never publishes. This is today rather than a forecast of December, because a forecast has to assume future matches and cannot know whether someone will even be offered them. Percentages are blank where a player has too few matches this season, or at a level where the model does not yet beat a base-rate guess; the estimate is a weaker claim than a probability and survives where those do not.

Not affiliated with or endorsed by the USTA. Ratings labelled as published are USTA year-end figures; anything we describe as an estimate is ours, not USTA’s. Match data is from USTA TennisLink.