Teams

LA/Boyd/Bossier City

2026 Adult 70 & Over Multi-State Championship · 3.0 Men

7 players · average NTRP 3.00 / ARKANSAS

View scouting list →
Schedule3 played
2026-04-30vs AR/Wallman/Bella VistaWon 21
W#1 DoublesJay Boyd / Robert Burleson vs Joseph Miller / Jeffrey York6-1, 6-2
L#2 DoublesMichael Doles / Alan Reger vs Cyril Severns / Keith Faber3-6, 7-5, 1-0
W#3 DoublesClifford Ashton / James Gilcrease vs Lou Wallman / Steve Bothwell6-0, 6-0
2026-04-29vs AR/Ritch/HSVWon 30
W#1 DoublesRobert Burleson / Michael Doles vs Edward Barbot / Floyd Lang6-2, 6-1
W#2 DoublesJay Boyd / Rick Holland vs David Robinson / Bill Barnes6-2, 6-1
W#3 DoublesJames Gilcrease / Clifford Ashton vs Pete Owens / Mike Ritch4-6, 6-2, 1-0
2026-04-29vs AR/Crum/NWAWon 30
W#1 DoublesRobert Burleson / Clifford Ashton vs Brian Keck / Val Robison7-6, 6-1
W#2 DoublesMichael Doles / Rick Holland vs Danny Paskiewicz / Malcolm Hayward6-3, 6-4
W#3 DoublesJay Boyd / Alan Reger vs William Brock / Stephen Adams6-0, 6-0
A tie can be incomplete. Tell us if someone is missing.
i
Grouped by tie — one fixture, several lines. A line shows only when a player on it is someone we have indexed, so an early-season tie for a newly-added team can look short. This also means the line count here will not match the header, which counts individual player appearances.
Flight standings3 teams · 3.0 Men
TeamWLInd. WInd. LSets lostGames lost
1LA/Boyd/Bossier City3081342
2AR/Ritch/HSV12361384
3AR/Crum/NWA03271492

Ordered by team wins, then losses, then sets lost — the order USTA uses to seed a flight. Individual wins are lines, not ties.

See the full flight, with every team’s record

ScoutingWhere each opponent usually plays

Signed-in extra: whether this captain plays strict strength order or mixes it up, from every doubles line they have put out. Create a free account to see it.

Roster averages 2.87 estimated across 6 rated players. No lineup is published in advance, so the column below is where each player has actually been used — a captain's habits are the best available forecast. Sign in and claim your record to see who you have played.

2.99
Jay Boyd
usually #2 Doubles 33%, also #3 Doubles 33% · published
2.91
Clifford Ashton
usually #3 Doubles 67%, also #1 Doubles 33% · published 3
2.90
Robert Burleson
usually #1 Doubles 100% · published
2.89
Alan Reger
usually #3 Doubles 50%, also #2 Doubles 50% · published 3
2.84
James Gilcrease
usually #3 Doubles 100% · published
2.72
Michael Doles
usually #2 Doubles 67%, also #1 Doubles 33% · published
Rick Holland
published
Established pairs

Doubles pairs from this roster with three or more matches together anywhere — ordered by performance against what the rating gap predicted, not by record.

Clifford Ashton + James Gilcrease314 matchesnot enough data
Roster

Ordered by our estimated dynamic rating, which is why two players at the same published level are not tied — a published 4.0 says nothing about where inside the band someone sits. Lines played in this team’s season are shown beside each name.

Jay Boyd
10W–8L career · 3 lines in 2026
<1%52%48%
2.99
3
Clifford Ashton
13W–24L career · type A · 3 lines in 2026
<1%75%25%
2.91
Robert Burleson
31W–26L career · 3 lines in 2026
<1%76%24%
2.90
3
Alan Reger
2W–2L career · type S · 2 lines in 2026
<1%79%21%
2.89
James Gilcrease
3W–2L career · 2 lines in 2026
1%87%12%
2.84
Michael Doles
18W–18L career · 3 lines in 2026
6%92%2%
2.72
Rick Holland
3W–3L career · no lines in 2026
not enough data

Three percentages are where each player stands right now: the chance they are below their band, inside it, or above it, on the way they are playing this season. The number on the right is our estimated dynamic rating, which USTA never publishes. This is today rather than a forecast of December, because a forecast has to assume future matches and cannot know whether someone will even be offered them. Percentages are blank where a player has too few matches this season, or at a level where the model does not yet beat a base-rate guess; the estimate is a weaker claim than a probability and survives where those do not.

Not affiliated with or endorsed by the USTA. Ratings labelled as published are USTA year-end figures; anything we describe as an estimate is ours, not USTA’s. Match data is from USTA TennisLink.