Teams

Ivory Ridge-Broadbent

2021 USTA Adult 18 & Over · 2.5W AM

6 players · average NTRP 2.83 / UTAH

No matches recorded for this roster in this league — it may be a placeholder registration, or the season may not have started.

View scouting list →
Schedule8 played
L#2 DoublesJill Broadbent / Jasmine Byers vs Tori Locke / Lexi Farr4-6, 6-7
2021-05-24vs South Jordan-CallisterWon 10
W#2 DoublesCara Larson / Jill Broadbent vs Erika Doty / Melanie Knaphus6-1, 6-2
2021-05-17vs CMTA @ Liberty Park-OlsenLost 02
L#1 DoublesJill Broadbent / Mindy Black vs Erin Massey / MacY Bell7-5, 2-6, 0-1
L#1 SinglesTiffany Riley vs Nancy Orme2-6, 0-6
L#1 DoublesTiffany Riley / Nancy Evensen vs Amy Teemant / Sandra Chamberlain1-6, 4-6
W#2 DoublesCara Larson / Jamie Dunbabin vs MARILYN PETERSEN / Cari Cardall6-0, 6-3
2021-05-03vs Ogden-Compton/KilgoreLost 01
L#2 DoublesJill Broadbent / Tiffany Riley vs Kelti Palmer / Tricia Buss5-7, 2-6
2021-04-26Lost 01
L#1 SinglesCara Larson vs AUBREY NELSON0-6, 1-6
2021-04-19Won 10
W#1 DoublesJill Broadbent / Jamie Dunbabin vs Amelia Ence / Erika Doty6-3, 6-4
2021-04-12vs CMTA @ Liberty Park-OlsenLost 01
L#2 DoublesCara Larson / Stefani Severson vs Rebecca Anderson / Liz Baucom1-6, 6-3, 0-1
A tie can be incomplete. Tell us if someone is missing.
i
Grouped by tie — one fixture, several lines. A line shows only when a player on it is someone we have indexed, so an early-season tie for a newly-added team can look short. This also means the line count here will not match the header, which counts individual player appearances.

Flight standings for 2.5W AM have not been collected yet. Where we have them we show every team in the flight ranked, with this team highlighted. The crawler is still filling in older seasons and flights.

ScoutingWhere each opponent usually plays

Signed-in extra: whether this captain plays strict strength order or mixes it up, from every doubles line they have put out. Create a free account to see it.

Roster averages 2.85 estimated across 4 rated players. No lineup is published in advance, so the column below is where each player has actually been used — a captain's habits are the best available forecast. Sign in and claim your record to see who you have played.

3.40
Tiffany Riley
usually #2 Doubles 33%, also #1 Doubles 33% · published
3.17
Miriam Moore
usually #1 Doubles 50%, also #2 Singles 20% · published
Jamie Dunbabin
usually #1 Doubles 25%, also #3 Doubles 25% · published 3
2.55
Jill Broadbent
usually #2 Doubles 60%, also #1 Doubles 40% · published 3
2.30
Cara Larson
usually #2 Doubles 75%, also #1 Singles 25% · published 2.5
Mindy Black
usually #1 Doubles 50%, also #3 Doubles 25% · published
Established pairs

Doubles pairs from this roster with three or more matches together anywhere — ordered by performance against what the rating gap predicted, not by record.

Mindy Black + Miriam Moore7750% games+5.5% vs expected
Jill Broadbent + Tiffany Riley6847% games−5.3% vs expected
Jill Broadbent + Mindy Black0525% gamesnot enough data
Tiffany Riley + Jamie Dunbabin2350% gamesnot enough data
Mindy Black + Jamie Dunbabin314 matchesnot enough data
Mindy Black + Tiffany Riley123 matchesnot enough data
Roster

Ordered by our estimated dynamic rating, which is why two players at the same published level are not tied — a published 4.0 says nothing about where inside the band someone sits. Lines played in this team’s season are shown beside each name.

Tiffany Riley
102W–91L career · 3 lines in 2021
<1%78%22%
3.40
Miriam Moore
57W–44L career · 9 lines in 2021
99%1%<1%
3.17
3
Jamie Dunbabin
23W–41L career · 10 lines in 2021
not enough data
3
Jill Broadbent
68W–93L career · 5 lines in 2021
35%65%<1%
2.55
2.5
Cara Larson
36W–58L career · 4 lines in 2021
0%94%6%
2.30
Mindy Black
36W–57L career · 12 lines in 2021
not enough data

Three percentages are where each player stands right now: the chance they are below their band, inside it, or above it, on the way they are playing this season. The number on the right is our estimated dynamic rating, which USTA never publishes. This is today rather than a forecast of December, because a forecast has to assume future matches and cannot know whether someone will even be offered them. Percentages are blank where a player has too few matches this season, or at a level where the model does not yet beat a base-rate guess; the estimate is a weaker claim than a probability and survives where those do not.

Not affiliated with or endorsed by the USTA. Ratings labelled as published are USTA year-end figures; anything we describe as an estimate is ours, not USTA’s. Match data is from USTA TennisLink.