Teams

Dream Team

2023 Virginia Beach Tri-Level 18 & Over · Virginia Beach Tri-Level 3.5, 3.0, 2.5 Women

13 players · average NTRP 3.42 / VIRGINIA

View scouting list →

Flight standings for Virginia Beach Tri-Level 3.5, 3.0, 2.5 Women have not been collected yet. Where we have them we show every team in the flight ranked, with this team highlighted. The crawler is still filling in older seasons and flights.

ScoutingWhere each opponent usually plays

Signed-in extra: whether this captain plays strict strength order or mixes it up, from every doubles line they have put out. Create a free account to see it.

Roster averages 3.06 estimated across 13 rated players. No lineup is published in advance, so the column below is where each player has actually been used — a captain's habits are the best available forecast. Sign in and claim your record to see who you have played.

3.71
Lori Cox
published
3.56
Alyse Chickey
usually #3 Doubles 50%, also #2 Doubles 50% · published 3.5
3.47
Elizabeth Peterson
published 3.5
3.34
Beth Skolnick
published 3.5
3.29
Beth Kulas
usually #1 Doubles 50%, also #2 Doubles 50% · published 3.5
3.17
Janet Brashear
published
3.12
Cami Jordan
published 3.5
2.90
Tiffani Sherlock
published
2.77
Stephanie Bowen
published
2.75
Faye Downey
published 3
2.73
Sara Froehler
published
2.69
Joelle Mclaughlin
published
2.29
Marianne Traywick
published
Established pairs

Doubles pairs from this roster with three or more matches together anywhere — ordered by performance against what the rating gap predicted, not by record.

Alyse Chickey + Elizabeth Peterson7654% games+3.8% vs expected
Sara Froehler + Tiffani Sherlock6848% games−6.4% vs expected
Beth Skolnick + Beth Kulas3353% gamesnot enough data
Janet Brashear + Cami Jordan213 matchesnot enough data
Roster

Ordered by our estimated dynamic rating, which is why two players at the same published level are not tied — a published 4.0 says nothing about where inside the band someone sits. Lines played in this team’s season are shown beside each name.

Lori Cox
11W–10L career · no lines in 2023
5%94%1%
3.71
3.5
Alyse Chickey
98W–58L career · 8 lines in 2023
<1%32%68%
3.56
3.5
Elizabeth Peterson
13W–7L career · no lines in 2023
<1%59%41%
3.47
3.5
Beth Skolnick
14W–8L career · no lines in 2023
<1%89%11%
3.34
3.5
Beth Kulas
78W–73L career · 6 lines in 2023
1%94%5%
3.29
Janet Brashear
2W–7L career · no lines in 2023
9%90%1%
3.17
3.5
Cami Jordan
2W–3L career · no lines in 2023
19%81%<1%
3.12
Tiffani Sherlock
23W–19L career · no lines in 2023
<1%78%21%
2.90
Stephanie Bowen
4W–9L career · no lines in 2023
2%94%4%
2.77
3
Faye Downey
12W–9L career · no lines in 2023
3%95%3%
2.75
Sara Froehler
10W–12L career · no lines in 2023
4%94%2%
2.73
Joelle Mclaughlin
6W–11L career · no lines in 2023
8%91%1%
2.69
Marianne Traywick
4W–5L career · no lines in 2023
0%94%6%
2.29

Three percentages are where each player stands right now: the chance they are below their band, inside it, or above it, on the way they are playing this season. The number on the right is our estimated dynamic rating, which USTA never publishes. This is today rather than a forecast of December, because a forecast has to assume future matches and cannot know whether someone will even be offered them. Percentages are blank where a player has too few matches this season, or at a level where the model does not yet beat a base-rate guess; the estimate is a weaker claim than a probability and survives where those do not.

Not affiliated with or endorsed by the USTA. Ratings labelled as published are USTA year-end figures; anything we describe as an estimate is ours, not USTA’s. Match data is from USTA TennisLink.