Teams

Harlingen Gavin

2026 Valley Adult Mixed 18 & Over 6.0 - 10.0 · 8.0 Valley Mixed Doubles

7 players · average NTRP 4.00 / TEXAS

View scouting list →
Schedule4 played
2026-08-20vs Brownsville WilliamLost 12
L#1 DoublesJaylynn Sanchez / Matthew Torres vs Monica Aguilar / William Taliancich1-6, 0-6
L#2 DoublesFrancisco Mendoza / Zaira Martinez-Guillen vs Michael Padilla / Judith Elena Saenz Figueroa3-6, 6-1, 0-1
W#3 DoublesTabitha Torres / Eddie Avitia vs Ricardo Losoya / Luz Cortes6-4, 2-6, 1-0
2026-08-13vs Harlingen RamiroWon 21
W#1 DoublesMoises Alcocer / Zaira Martinez-Guillen vs Ramiro Gomez / Julianne Martinez6-2, 7-6
W#2 DoublesTabitha Torres / Eddie Avitia vs Ruben Contreras / Jamie Alejandro6-4, 6-4
L#3 DoublesJaylynn Sanchez / Matthew Torres vs Kayla Garcia / Justin Rubio6-3, 3-6, 0-1
2026-07-30vs Harlingen JPLost 12
W#1 DoublesMoises Alcocer / Zaira Martinez-Guillen vs Leo Cantu / Toni Ibarra6-2, 6-4
L#2 DoublesEddie Avitia / Tabitha Torres vs Diego Salazar / Anica Diaz3-6, 6-3, 0-1
L#3 DoublesJaylynn Sanchez / Matthew Torres vs Juan Sauceda / Ena Capucion1-6, 3-6
2026-07-30vs HCC CadeLost 02
L#1 DoublesTabitha Torres / Francisco Mendoza vs Carson Wick / Mary Scaief4-6, 1-6
L#2 DoublesJaylynn Sanchez / Moises Alcocer vs Paula Fields / Dalton Mann4-6, 2-6
A tie can be incomplete. Tell us if someone is missing.
i
Grouped by tie — one fixture, several lines. A line shows only when a player on it is someone we have indexed, so an early-season tie for a newly-added team can look short. This also means the line count here will not match the header, which counts individual player appearances.
Flight standings4 teams · 8.0 Valley Mixed Doubles
TeamWLInd. WInd. LSets lostGames lost
1Brownsville William4093773
2HCC Cade2284982
3Harlingen Gavin134817120
4Harlingen Ramiro0421021141

Ordered by team wins, then losses, then sets lost — the order USTA uses to seed a flight. Individual wins are lines, not ties.

See the full flight, with every team’s record

ScoutingWhere each opponent usually plays

Signed-in extra: whether this captain plays strict strength order or mixes it up, from every doubles line they have put out. Create a free account to see it.

Roster averages 3.61 estimated across 7 rated players. No lineup is published in advance, so the column below is where each player has actually been used — a captain's habits are the best available forecast. Sign in and claim your record to see who you have played.

4.07
Moises Alcocer
usually #1 Doubles 67%, also #2 Doubles 33% · published
3.74
Gavin Lerma
published 4
3.68
Zaira Martinez-Guillen
usually #1 Doubles 67%, also #2 Doubles 33% · published
3.64
Matthew Torres
usually #3 Doubles 67%, also #1 Doubles 33% · published
3.62
Francisco Mendoza
usually #2 Doubles 50%, also #1 Doubles 50% · published 4
3.41
Tabitha Torres
usually #2 Doubles 50%, also #3 Doubles 25% · published
3.15
Jaylynn Sanchez
usually #3 Doubles 50%, also #1 Doubles 25% · published
Established pairs

Doubles pairs from this roster with three or more matches together anywhere — ordered by performance against what the rating gap predicted, not by record.

Matthew Torres + Jaylynn Sanchez033 matchesnot enough data
Roster

Ordered by our estimated dynamic rating, which is why two players at the same published level are not tied — a published 4.0 says nothing about where inside the band someone sits. Lines played in this team’s season are shown beside each name.

Moises Alcocer
6W–1L career · 3 lines in 2026
<1%31%69%
4.07
4
Gavin Lerma
8W–12L career · no lines in 2026
3%95%2%
3.74
Zaira Martinez-Guillen
35W–7L career · 3 lines in 2026
<1%8%92%
3.68
Matthew Torres
1W–7L career · 3 lines in 2026
14%86%<1%
3.64
4
Francisco Mendoza
9W–12L career · 2 lines in 2026
19%81%<1%
3.62
Tabitha Torres
12W–10L career · 4 lines in 2026
<1%75%25%
3.41
Jaylynn Sanchez
12W–6L career · 4 lines in 2026
13%87%<1%
3.15

Three percentages are where each player stands right now: the chance they are below their band, inside it, or above it, on the way they are playing this season. The number on the right is our estimated dynamic rating, which USTA never publishes. This is today rather than a forecast of December, because a forecast has to assume future matches and cannot know whether someone will even be offered them. Percentages are blank where a player has too few matches this season, or at a level where the model does not yet beat a base-rate guess; the estimate is a weaker claim than a probability and survives where those do not.

Not affiliated with or endorsed by the USTA. Ratings labelled as published are USTA year-end figures; anything we describe as an estimate is ours, not USTA’s. Match data is from USTA TennisLink.