Teams

CSW-Terminella

2021 Richmond Mixed 18 & Over Winter · Richmond Mixed 18 & Over 8.0

10 players · average NTRP 3.83 / VIRGINIA

View scouting list →
Schedule9 played
2021-03-26vs RAIN-FallinWon 20
W#2 DoublesLaurent Beausergent / Daniela Otto vs Stephen Ross / Kerry Torres6-3, 2-6, 1-0
W#3 DoublesGeorge Brickley / Lesley Terminella vs N/A6-0, 6-0
2021-03-20Lost 01
L#1 DoublesDoug Blouch / Daniela Otto vs Ryan Harris / Heather Griggs2-6, 0-6
2021-03-05vs SAL-FranksLost 01
L#3 DoublesAnnmarie Lobred / Zachary Walton vs Karen Deaver / John Barefoot5-7, 2-6
2021-02-28Won 10
W#3 DoublesDoug Blouch / Daniela Otto vs John King / Kristi King6-3, 6-2
2021-02-19vs ACAC-FulcherLost 01
L#3 DoublesLaurent Beausergent / Annmarie Lobred vs Majd Babik / Leigh Gorman2-6, 3-6
2021-01-31vs MTC-MillerLost 02
L#2 DoublesLesley Terminella / Doug Blouch vs Jamie Stokes / Tracy Marks5-7, 4-2, 0-1
L#3 DoublesDaniela Otto / Laurent Beausergent vs Betsy Civilette / Lewis Farinholt2-6, 5-7
2021-01-22vs MAC-HuangLost 02
L#1 DoublesByron Holmes / Annmarie Lobred vs Adam Hamilton / Emily Huang3-6, 6-3, 0-1
L#2 DoublesZachary Walton / Daniela Otto vs Wayne Motley / Katherine Clapp6-3, 1-6, 0-1
2021-01-17vs ACAC-DelisioWon 10
W#1 DoublesLesley Terminella / David Israel vs Andrea Morrow / Christopher Corts4-6, 6-3, 1-0
2021-01-09vs BURK-KampingaSplit 11
W#1 DoublesLesley Terminella / Zachary Walton vs Marie Browning / Tom Newton6-7, 6-3, 1-0
L#3 DoublesLaurent Beausergent / Daniela Otto vs Kimberley Winn / Mario Wright2-6, 6-7
A tie can be incomplete. Tell us if someone is missing.
i
Grouped by tie — one fixture, several lines. A line shows only when a player on it is someone we have indexed, so an early-season tie for a newly-added team can look short. This also means the line count here will not match the header, which counts individual player appearances.

Flight standings for Richmond Mixed 18 & Over 8.0 have not been collected yet. Where we have them we show every team in the flight ranked, with this team highlighted. The crawler is still filling in older seasons and flights.

ScoutingWhere each opponent usually plays

Signed-in extra: whether this captain plays strict strength order or mixes it up, from every doubles line they have put out. Create a free account to see it.

Roster averages 3.62 estimated across 9 rated players. No lineup is published in advance, so the column below is where each player has actually been used — a captain's habits are the best available forecast. Sign in and claim your record to see who you have played.

4.23
Byron Holmes
published 4.5
3.93
Zachary Walton
published
3.80
Lesley Terminella
usually #1 Doubles 50%, also #2 Doubles 25% · published
3.61
Annmarie Lobred
usually #1 Doubles 50%, also #3 Doubles 33% · published 4
3.56
Daniela Otto
usually #3 Doubles 50%, also #2 Doubles 33% · published 4
3.45
Charlotte Shirey
published 3.5
3.42
Wendy Miller
published
3.31
George Brickley
published 3.5
3.27
Doug Blouch
published 3.5
Laurent Beausergent
published
Roster

Ordered by our estimated dynamic rating, which is why two players at the same published level are not tied — a published 4.0 says nothing about where inside the band someone sits. Lines played in this team’s season are shown beside each name.

4.5
Byron Holmes
9W–11L career · no lines in 2021
4%94%2%
4.23
Zachary Walton
8W–7L career · no lines in 2021
<1%71%29%
3.93
Lesley Terminella
135W–62L career · 4 lines in 2021
1%93%6%
3.80
4
Annmarie Lobred
155W–109L career · 6 lines in 2021
21%79%<1%
3.61
4
Daniela Otto
117W–203L career · 6 lines in 2021
33%67%<1%
3.56
3.5
Charlotte Shirey
6W–1L career · no lines in 2021
<1%66%34%
3.45
Wendy Miller
3W–5L career · no lines in 2021
73%27%<1%
3.42
3.5
George Brickley
13W–20L career · no lines in 2021
1%92%7%
3.31
3.5
Doug Blouch
26W–29L career · no lines in 2021
2%94%4%
3.27
Laurent Beausergent
1W–1L career · no lines in 2021
not enough data

Three percentages are where each player stands right now: the chance they are below their band, inside it, or above it, on the way they are playing this season. The number on the right is our estimated dynamic rating, which USTA never publishes. This is today rather than a forecast of December, because a forecast has to assume future matches and cannot know whether someone will even be offered them. Percentages are blank where a player has too few matches this season, or at a level where the model does not yet beat a base-rate guess; the estimate is a weaker claim than a probability and survives where those do not.

Not affiliated with or endorsed by the USTA. Ratings labelled as published are USTA year-end figures; anything we describe as an estimate is ours, not USTA’s. Match data is from USTA TennisLink.