Teams

Fee - Luer

2025 Brevard Combo 18 & Over · 5.5 Women

13 players · average NTRP 2.80 / REGION_4

View scouting list →
Schedule6 played
2025-10-08vs Brevard/Vickers/Combo18&Over5.5WLost 01
L#1 DoublesKatharyn Luer / Valeska Redon vs Cyndi Mcdougall / DEE MANUEL3-6, 1-6
2025-09-27vs EFSC - ArcherWon 10
W#2 DoublesKatharyn Luer / Eileen Bentley vs Calli Ohlin / Shelley Vandermeulen6-1, 6-0
2025-09-24vs Suntree - TaborWon 10
W#3 DoublesKatharyn Luer / Amanda Mccaughin vs Mary Overton / Laura Breisch1-6, 6-3, 1-0
2025-09-03vs Brevard/Vickers/Combo18&Over5.5WWon 20
W#1 DoublesKatharyn Luer / Valeska Redon vs Lael Woods / DEE MANUEL6-4, 4-6, 1-0
W#3 DoublesRenee Jiannine / Hanh Pham vs Jenifer Raymond / Lindsay Nichols6-4, 3-6, 1-0
2025-08-20vs Suntree - TaborWon 10
W#2 DoublesRenee Jiannine / Anna Marie Pippett vs Maria Reza / Laura Breisch6-1, 6-2
2025-08-13vs EFSC - ArcherWon 10
W#1 DoublesRenee Jiannine / Sandy Cuddeback vs Cheryl Toth / Alix Amozig6-4, 6-4
A tie can be incomplete. Tell us if someone is missing.
i
Grouped by tie — one fixture, several lines. A line shows only when a player on it is someone we have indexed, so an early-season tie for a newly-added team can look short. This also means the line count here will not match the header, which counts individual player appearances.

Flight standings for 5.5 Women have not been collected yet. Where we have them we show every team in the flight ranked, with this team highlighted. The crawler is still filling in older seasons and flights.

ScoutingWhere each opponent usually plays

Signed-in extra: whether this captain plays strict strength order or mixes it up, from every doubles line they have put out. Create a free account to see it.

Roster averages 2.75 estimated across 10 rated players. No lineup is published in advance, so the column below is where each player has actually been used — a captain's habits are the best available forecast. Sign in and claim your record to see who you have played.

3.28
Leslie Love
published
3.07
Jennifer Bailey
published
2.93
Renee Jiannine
usually #2 Doubles 60%, also #1 Doubles 20% · published 3
2.91
Katharyn Luer
usually #2 Doubles 50%, also #1 Doubles 33% · published 3
2.81
Milena Alicea
published
2.75
Valeska Redon
published
2.70
Michelle Dunn
published
2.48
Eileen Bentley
published
2.36
Anna Marie Pippett
published 2.5
Amanda Mccaughin
published 2.5
2.24
Phuong Essa
published
Sandy Cuddeback
published
Established pairs

Doubles pairs from this roster with three or more matches together anywhere — ordered by performance against what the rating gap predicted, not by record.

Katharyn Luer + Renee Jiannine13659% games+11.2% vs expected
Roster

Ordered by our estimated dynamic rating, which is why two players at the same published level are not tied — a published 4.0 says nothing about where inside the band someone sits. Lines played in this team’s season are shown beside each name.

Leslie Love
17W–9L career · no lines in 2025
<1%2%98%
3.28
Jennifer Bailey
2W–14L career · no lines in 2025
0%<1%>99%
3.07
3
Renee Jiannine
104W–89L career · 5 lines in 2025
<1%70%30%
2.93
3
Katharyn Luer
158W–172L career · 6 lines in 2025
<1%73%27%
2.91
Milena Alicea
12W–9L career · no lines in 2025
1%90%9%
2.81
3
Daricca Facciobene
5W–3L career · no lines in 2025
not enough data
Valeska Redon
11W–3L career · no lines in 2025
0%4%96%
2.75
Michelle Dunn
12W–12L career · no lines in 2025
7%91%2%
2.70
Eileen Bentley
10W–2L career · no lines in 2025
0%56%44%
2.48
2.5
Anna Marie Pippett
5W–4L career · no lines in 2025
0%84%16%
2.36
2.5
Amanda Mccaughin
2W–3L career · no lines in 2025
not enough data
Phuong Essa
0W–5L career · no lines in 2025
97%3%<1%
2.24
Sandy Cuddeback
4W–2L career · no lines in 2025
not enough data

Three percentages are where each player stands right now: the chance they are below their band, inside it, or above it, on the way they are playing this season. The number on the right is our estimated dynamic rating, which USTA never publishes. This is today rather than a forecast of December, because a forecast has to assume future matches and cannot know whether someone will even be offered them. Percentages are blank where a player has too few matches this season, or at a level where the model does not yet beat a base-rate guess; the estimate is a weaker claim than a probability and survives where those do not.

Not affiliated with or endorsed by the USTA. Ratings labelled as published are USTA year-end figures; anything we describe as an estimate is ours, not USTA’s. Match data is from USTA TennisLink.