Teams

CBRC-Pak

2026 Adult 40 & Over · 3.0 MEN

10 players · average NTRP 2.93 / EASTERN WASHINGTON

View scouting list →
Schedule4 played
2026-05-17vs YTC-Cracket RacketsLost 04
L#1 DoublesDavid Porter / Tim Armstrong vs Sean Michael / Jeff Ketcham3-6, 3-6
L#1 SinglesEric Ferguson vs Matthew Crow0-6, 1-6
L#2 DoublesGughan Sathyaseelan / Nate Pak vs Kirk Ehlis / Anthony Farina1-6, 0-6
L#3 DoublesScot Hymas / Ridha Mabrouki vs Phillip Romer / David Richardson4-6, 7-5, 0-1
2026-05-16vs EW-PC-ShepherdLost 13
L#1 DoublesEric Ferguson / Roderick Busalpa vs Aric Robertson / Brian Cunnington1-6, 0-6
L#1 SinglesGughan Sathyaseelan vs Daniel Santosa1-6, 0-6
L#2 DoublesDavid Porter / Tim Armstrong vs Jaehun Chun / Henry Han3-6, 0-6
W#3 DoublesDaniel Cragin / Paul Monie vs John Hilmes / Ryan Brooks3-6, 6-4, 1-0
2026-05-16vs YTC-Cracket RacketsLost 13
L#1 DoublesPaul Monie / Daniel Cragin vs Sean Michael / Anthony Farina0-6, 2-6
L#1 SinglesRidha Mabrouki vs Jeff Ketcham4-6, 0-6
L#2 DoublesDavid Porter / Tim Armstrong vs Jeff Mee / Jacob Throolin4-6, 6-4, 0-1
W#3 DoublesGughan Sathyaseelan / Nate Pak vs Scott Jacky / Phillip Romer6-4, 6-4
2026-05-15vs EW-PC-ShepherdLost 04
L#1 DoublesRidha Mabrouki / Scot Hymas vs Aric Robertson / Bart Munson1-6, 0-6
L#1 SinglesNate Pak vs Tim Rosenthal0-6, 0-6
L#2 DoublesRoderick Busalpa / Paul Monie vs Jaehun Chun / William Levy3-6, 3-6
L#3 DoublesDavid Porter / Daniel Cragin vs Lawrence Shepherd / Brian Cunnington2-6, 2-6
A tie can be incomplete. Tell us if someone is missing.
i
Grouped by tie — one fixture, several lines. A line shows only when a player on it is someone we have indexed, so an early-season tie for a newly-added team can look short. This also means the line count here will not match the header, which counts individual player appearances.

Flight standings for 3.0 MEN have not been collected yet. Where we have them we show every team in the flight ranked, with this team highlighted. The crawler is still filling in older seasons and flights.

ScoutingWhere each opponent usually plays

Signed-in extra: whether this captain plays strict strength order or mixes it up, from every doubles line they have put out. Create a free account to see it.

Roster averages 2.51 estimated across 10 rated players. No lineup is published in advance, so the column below is where each player has actually been used — a captain's habits are the best available forecast. Sign in and claim your record to see who you have played.

2.68
David Porter
usually #2 Doubles 50%, also #3 Doubles 25% · published 3
2.67
Tim Armstrong
usually #2 Doubles 67%, also #1 Doubles 33% · published 3
2.64
Daniel Cragin
usually #3 Doubles 67%, also #1 Doubles 33% · published 3
2.60
Paul Monie
usually #2 Doubles 33%, also #1 Doubles 33% · published 3
2.59
Ridha Mabrouki
usually #3 Doubles 33%, also #1 Singles 33% · published
2.49
Eric Ferguson
usually #1 Singles 50%, also #1 Doubles 50% · published 3
2.48
Roderick Busalpa
usually #2 Doubles 50%, also #1 Doubles 50% · published 3
2.37
Gughan Sathyaseelan
usually #2 Doubles 33%, also #1 Singles 33% · published 2.5
2.29
Nate Pak
usually #2 Doubles 33%, also #3 Doubles 33% · published
2.28
Scot Hymas
usually #3 Doubles 50%, also #1 Doubles 50% · published
Established pairs

Doubles pairs from this roster with three or more matches together anywhere — ordered by performance against what the rating gap predicted, not by record.

Nate Pak + Gughan Sathyaseelan3441% games−6.9% vs expected
Roderick Busalpa + Eric Ferguson1536% games−7.7% vs expected
Daniel Cragin + Paul Monie123 matchesnot enough data
David Porter + Tim Armstrong033 matchesnot enough data
Roster

Ordered by our estimated dynamic rating, which is why two players at the same published level are not tied — a published 4.0 says nothing about where inside the band someone sits. Lines played in this team’s season are shown beside each name.

3
David Porter
2W–7L career · type S · 4 lines in 2026
8%91%1%
2.68
3
Tim Armstrong
1W–7L career · type S · 3 lines in 2026
10%90%1%
2.67
3
Daniel Cragin
27W–46L career · 3 lines in 2026
14%86%<1%
2.64
3
Paul Monie
4W–11L career · type S · 3 lines in 2026
22%78%<1%
2.60
Ridha Mabrouki
0W–3L career · 3 lines in 2026
25%75%<1%
2.59
3
Eric Ferguson
1W–10L career · 2 lines in 2026
54%46%<1%
2.49
3
Roderick Busalpa
3W–20L career · type S · 2 lines in 2026
58%42%<1%
2.48
2.5
Gughan Sathyaseelan
3W–8L career · type S · 3 lines in 2026
0%84%16%
2.37
Nate Pak
3W–12L career · 3 lines in 2026
0%94%6%
2.29
Scot Hymas
2W–2L career · 2 lines in 2026
0%96%4%
2.28

Three percentages are where each player stands right now: the chance they are below their band, inside it, or above it, on the way they are playing this season. The number on the right is our estimated dynamic rating, which USTA never publishes. This is today rather than a forecast of December, because a forecast has to assume future matches and cannot know whether someone will even be offered them. Percentages are blank where a player has too few matches this season, or at a level where the model does not yet beat a base-rate guess; the estimate is a weaker claim than a probability and survives where those do not.

Not affiliated with or endorsed by the USTA. Ratings labelled as published are USTA year-end figures; anything we describe as an estimate is ours, not USTA’s. Match data is from USTA TennisLink.