Teams

Christensen

2024 Neb. Adult 18&Over · 3.0 Women

11 players · average NTRP 3.00 / NEBRASKA

No matches recorded for this roster in this league — it may be a placeholder registration, or the season may not have started.

View scouting list →
Schedule6 played
2024-06-17vs KoertenSplit 22
W#1 DoublesEmily Lankhorst / Lacey Hudnut vs Breann Meisinger / Trish Weekly6-2, 6-3
W#2 DoublesSamantha Roberts / Tara Shields vs Deana Klein / Angelee Quandt6-3, 4-6, 1-0
L#2 SinglesSarah Chantiam vs Eleanore Tiehen5-7, 3-6
L#3 DoublesMarci Crone / Mary Ann Caputo vs Corie Barnard / Laura Deck6-3, 2-6, 1-0
2024-06-03vs NE/McDill/Stephan/18&Over3.0WLost 05
L#1 DoublesHolly Mattox / Tara Shields vs Malory Estes / Amiera Rayyan2-6, 1-6
L#1 SinglesEmily Lankhorst vs Emma Heiser2-6, 0-6
L#2 DoublesAllison Raetz / Samantha Roberts vs Stephanie Nelson / Brianne Stephan3-6, 6-4, 0-1
L#2 SinglesSarah Chantiam vs Sarah Sindelar1-6, 4-6
L#3 DoublesMary Ann Caputo / Brenda Christensen vs Jessica Winter / Brie Reynolds2-6, 1-6
2024-05-19vs KorteLost 13
L#1 DoublesMary Ann Caputo / Marci Crone vs Carol Hoiberg / Jennifer Strand6-3, 2-6, 0-1
L#1 SinglesEmily Lankhorst vs Julia Sandman0-6, 2-6
W#2 DoublesLacey Hudnut / Sarah Chantiam vs Yelizaveta Beltz / Jill Hallgren7-5, 4-6, 1-0
L#3 DoublesBrenda Christensen / Allison Raetz vs Neli Morales / Mary Pat Loos1-6, 1-6
2024-05-13vs FriedmanLost 23
L#1 DoublesSamantha Roberts / Lacey Hudnut vs Catherine Johnson / Debra Bigando0-6, 2-6
W#1 SinglesSarah Chantiam vs Victoria Vinton2-6, 6-4, 1-0
L#2 DoublesHolly Mattox / Tara Shields vs Laura Melendy / Jen Mitten1-6, 6-3, 0-1
W#2 SinglesJESSICA FITTON vs Beth Riggert6-2, 6-2
L#3 DoublesMarci Crone / Brenda Christensen vs Christine Kozal / Julie Johanning1-6, 3-6
2024-05-13vs O'SheaWon 31
L#1 DoublesMarci Crone / Lacey Hudnut vs Sarah Albright / Lauren Maskin6-7, 1-6
W#1 SinglesEmily Lankhorst vs Chanda Moore4-6, 7-5, 1-0
W#2 DoublesBrenda Christensen / Holly Mattox vs Sarah OShea / Amanda Woodward-Kennedy6-4, 6-0
W#3 DoublesAllison Raetz / Tara Shields vs Margaret Brockman / Linda Friedrich6-2, 6-3
2024-04-29vs GilroyLost 14
W#1 DoublesAllison Raetz / JESSICA FITTON vs Michelle Clark / Billie Dixon6-2, 3-6, 1-0
L#1 SinglesEmily Lankhorst vs Jennifer Dwyer6-2, 1-6, 1-0
L#2 DoublesMary Ann Caputo / Lacey Hudnut vs Erin Giannangelo / Erin Foley3-6, 1-6
L#2 SinglesSarah Chantiam vs Sarah Smith1-6, 2-6
L#3 DoublesMarci Crone / Tara Shields vs Suzanne MacAulay / Julie Post1-6, 0-6
A tie can be incomplete. Tell us if someone is missing.
i
Grouped by tie — one fixture, several lines. A line shows only when a player on it is someone we have indexed, so an early-season tie for a newly-added team can look short. This also means the line count here will not match the header, which counts individual player appearances.
Flight standings7 teams · 3.0 Women
TeamWLInd. WInd. LSets lostGames lost
1NE/McDill/Stephan/18&Over3.0W6024617182
2Gilroy5121924210
3Korte33151533246
4Friedman33161435271
5Koerten23111431242
6Christensen15102045297
7O'Shea0532245278

Ordered by team wins, then losses, then sets lost — the order USTA uses to seed a flight. Individual wins are lines, not ties.

See the full flight, with every team’s record

ScoutingWhere each opponent usually plays

Signed-in extra: whether this captain plays strict strength order or mixes it up, from every doubles line they have put out. Create a free account to see it.

Roster averages 2.72 estimated across 7 rated players. No lineup is published in advance, so the column below is where each player has actually been used — a captain's habits are the best available forecast. Sign in and claim your record to see who you have played.

2.85
Sarah Chantiam
usually #2 Singles 60%, also #1 Singles 20% · published
2.82
Samantha Roberts
usually #2 Doubles 67%, also #1 Doubles 33% · published
2.79
Lacey Hudnut
usually #1 Doubles 60%, also #2 Doubles 40% · published
2.77
Allison Raetz
usually #3 Doubles 50%, also #2 Doubles 25% · published 3
Brenda Christensen
usually #3 Doubles 75%, also #2 Doubles 25% · published 3
Holly Mattox
usually #2 Doubles 67%, also #1 Doubles 33% · published 3
JESSICA FITTON
usually #2 Singles 50%, also #1 Doubles 50% · published 3
2.65
Tara Shields
usually #2 Doubles 40%, also #3 Doubles 40% · published
2.60
Mary Ann Caputo
usually #3 Doubles 50%, also #2 Doubles 25% · published
2.58
Emily Lankhorst
usually #1 Singles 80%, also #1 Doubles 20% · published 3
Marci Crone
usually #3 Doubles 60%, also #1 Doubles 40% · published
Established pairs

Doubles pairs from this roster with three or more matches together anywhere — ordered by performance against what the rating gap predicted, not by record.

Samantha Roberts + Tara Shields3258% gamesnot enough data
Allison Raetz + Samantha Roberts224 matchesnot enough data
Lacey Hudnut + Emily Lankhorst224 matchesnot enough data
Tara Shields + Mary Ann Caputo134 matchesnot enough data
Allison Raetz + Tara Shields213 matchesnot enough data
Marci Crone + Brenda Christensen033 matchesnot enough data
Lacey Hudnut + Samantha Roberts213 matchesnot enough data
Lacey Hudnut + Sarah Chantiam303 matchesnot enough data
Roster

Ordered by our estimated dynamic rating, which is why two players at the same published level are not tied — a published 4.0 says nothing about where inside the band someone sits. Lines played in this team’s season are shown beside each name.

Sarah Chantiam
12W–14L career · 5 lines in 2024
<1%88%12%
2.85
Samantha Roberts
8W–6L career · 3 lines in 2024
1%91%8%
2.82
Lacey Hudnut
16W–9L career · 5 lines in 2024
1%94%5%
2.79
3
Allison Raetz
14W–13L career · 4 lines in 2024
2%94%4%
2.77
3
Brenda Christensen
3W–9L career · 4 lines in 2024
not enough data
3
Holly Mattox
4W–6L career · 3 lines in 2024
not enough data
3
JESSICA FITTON
4W–2L career · 2 lines in 2024
not enough data
Tara Shields
6W–13L career · 5 lines in 2024
12%88%<1%
2.65
Mary Ann Caputo
3W–9L career · 4 lines in 2024
21%78%<1%
2.60
3
Emily Lankhorst
7W–15L career · 5 lines in 2024
26%74%<1%
2.58
Marci Crone
1W–9L career · 5 lines in 2024
not enough data

Three percentages are where each player stands right now: the chance they are below their band, inside it, or above it, on the way they are playing this season. The number on the right is our estimated dynamic rating, which USTA never publishes. This is today rather than a forecast of December, because a forecast has to assume future matches and cannot know whether someone will even be offered them. Percentages are blank where a player has too few matches this season, or at a level where the model does not yet beat a base-rate guess; the estimate is a weaker claim than a probability and survives where those do not.

Not affiliated with or endorsed by the USTA. Ratings labelled as published are USTA year-end figures; anything we describe as an estimate is ours, not USTA’s. Match data is from USTA TennisLink.