Teams

Sweet Shots

2025 Adult 65 and Over League · 7.0 Women

11 players · average NTRP 3.36 / EAST HAWAII

View scouting list →
Schedule6 played
2025-08-17vs Double the FunWon 30
W#1 DoublesLynn Hatada / Frances Calantoc vs Merle Yoshino / Susan Nakamura-Koge7-6, 7-5
W#2 DoublesLori Yamamoto / Charlotte Etling vs Aiko Mitchel / Elaine Reed6-2, 6-4
W#3 DoublesMarleen Cabarloc / Hanna Wilson vs Charlene Pascual / Mary Ryan6-0, 6-2
2025-08-10vs Double the FunWon 30
W#1 DoublesHanna Wilson / Tomoko Fuselier vs Mildred Kaneshiro / Merle Yoshino6-2, 6-1
W#2 DoublesKaryn Tada / Valerie Galacgac vs Jeanne Harano-Hernandez / Meg Saunders6-4, 6-3
W#3 DoublesJo Ann Ishida / Lori Yamamoto vs Mary Ryan / Aiko Mitchel6-2, 5-7, 1-0
2025-08-03vs Double the FunWon 30
W#1 DoublesFrances Calantoc / Lynn Hatada vs Sheila Tamura / Aiko Mitchel6-1, 7-5
W#2 DoublesMarleen Cabarloc / Karyn Tada vs Mildred Kaneshiro / Charlene Pascual6-2, 6-2
W#3 DoublesHanna Wilson / Valerie Galacgac vs Jeanne Harano-Hernandez / Elaine Reed4-6, 7-6, 1-0
2025-07-29vs Double the FunWon 21
W#1 DoublesJo Ann Ishida / Frances Calantoc vs Mary Ryan / Susan Nakamura-Koge6-1, 6-3
L#2 DoublesMarleen Cabarloc / Charlotte Etling vs Charlene Pascual / Merle Yoshino1-6, 1-6
W#3 DoublesLori Yamamoto / Hanna Wilson vs Mildred Kaneshiro / Meg Saunders6-0, 6-2
2025-07-13vs Double the FunLost 12
L#1 DoublesValerie Galacgac / Hanna Wilson vs Susan Nakamura-Koge / Mary Ryan6-3, 3-6, 0-1
L#2 DoublesMarleen Cabarloc / Frances Calantoc vs Meg Saunders / Sheila Tamura2-6, 3-6
W#3 DoublesCharlotte Etling / Tomoko Fuselier vs Aiko Mitchel / Elaine Reed6-1, 6-0
2025-07-06vs Double the FunWon 30
W#1 DoublesFrances Calantoc / Lynn Hatada vs Mildred Kaneshiro / Charlene Pascual6-0, 6-2
W#2 DoublesTomoko Fuselier / Hanna Wilson vs Merle Yoshino / Jeanne Harano-Hernandez6-2, 6-1
W#3 DoublesLori Yamamoto / Karyn Tada vs Elaine Reed / Sheila Tamura6-2, 6-3
A tie can be incomplete. Tell us if someone is missing.
i
Grouped by tie — one fixture, several lines. A line shows only when a player on it is someone we have indexed, so an early-season tie for a newly-added team can look short. This also means the line count here will not match the header, which counts individual player appearances.

Flight standings for 7.0 Women have not been collected yet. Where we have them we show every team in the flight ranked, with this team highlighted. The crawler is still filling in older seasons and flights.

ScoutingWhere each opponent usually plays

Signed-in extra: whether this captain plays strict strength order or mixes it up, from every doubles line they have put out. Create a free account to see it.

Roster averages 3.04 estimated across 9 rated players. No lineup is published in advance, so the column below is where each player has actually been used — a captain's habits are the best available forecast. Sign in and claim your record to see who you have played.

3.77
Karyn Tada
usually #2 Doubles 67%, also #3 Doubles 33% · published 4
3.26
Hanna Wilson
usually #3 Doubles 50%, also #1 Doubles 33% · published 3.5
3.18
Frances Calantoc
usually #1 Doubles 80%, also #2 Doubles 20% · published 3.5
3.14
Tomoko Fuselier
usually #1 Doubles 33%, also #3 Doubles 33% · published
3.04
Lynn Hatada
usually #1 Doubles 100% · published 3.5
2.96
Charlotte Etling
usually #2 Doubles 43%, also #3 Doubles 29% · published 3
2.75
Marleen Cabarloc
usually #2 Doubles 50%, also #3 Doubles 38% · published
2.62
Stephanie Oshiro
usually #2 Doubles 50%, also #1 Doubles 25% · published 3
2.61
Valerie Galacgac
usually #1 Doubles 33%, also #3 Doubles 33% · published 3
Jo Ann Ishida
usually #1 Doubles 60%, also #3 Doubles 40% · published
Lori Yamamoto
usually #3 Doubles 43%, also #1 Doubles 29% · published
Established pairs

Doubles pairs from this roster with three or more matches together anywhere — ordered by performance against what the rating gap predicted, not by record.

Marleen Cabarloc + Hanna Wilson6360% games+10.9% vs expected
Tomoko Fuselier + Hanna Wilson21659% games+9.3% vs expected
Valerie Galacgac + Hanna Wilson4746% games+5.2% vs expected
Valerie Galacgac + Frances Calantoc2347% games+4.3% vs expected
Marleen Cabarloc + Valerie Galacgac1445% games+3.9% vs expected
Lynn Hatada + Frances Calantoc8457% games+2.9% vs expected
Frances Calantoc + Hanna Wilson4842% games−7.9% vs expected
Lynn Hatada + Hanna Wilson4547% gamesnot enough data
Roster

Ordered by our estimated dynamic rating, which is why two players at the same published level are not tied — a published 4.0 says nothing about where inside the band someone sits. Lines played in this team’s season are shown beside each name.

4
Karyn Tada
51W–56L career · 3 lines in 2025
2%94%4%
3.77
3.5
Hanna Wilson
83W–106L career · 6 lines in 2025
2%94%3%
3.26
3.5
Frances Calantoc
57W–80L career · 5 lines in 2025
9%91%1%
3.18
Tomoko Fuselier
59W–67L career · 3 lines in 2025
15%85%<1%
3.14
3.5
Lynn Hatada
60W–143L career · 3 lines in 2025
38%62%<1%
3.04
3
Charlotte Etling
92W–39L career · 7 lines in 2025
<1%63%37%
2.96
Marleen Cabarloc
77W–75L career · 8 lines in 2025
3%95%3%
2.75
3
Stephanie Oshiro
41W–39L career · 4 lines in 2025
18%81%<1%
2.62
3
Valerie Galacgac
101W–147L career · 6 lines in 2025
19%81%<1%
2.61
Jo Ann Ishida
49W–18L career · 5 lines in 2025
not enough data
Lori Yamamoto
24W–18L career · 7 lines in 2025
not enough data

Three percentages are where each player stands right now: the chance they are below their band, inside it, or above it, on the way they are playing this season. The number on the right is our estimated dynamic rating, which USTA never publishes. This is today rather than a forecast of December, because a forecast has to assume future matches and cannot know whether someone will even be offered them. Percentages are blank where a player has too few matches this season, or at a level where the model does not yet beat a base-rate guess; the estimate is a weaker claim than a probability and survives where those do not.

Not affiliated with or endorsed by the USTA. Ratings labelled as published are USTA year-end figures; anything we describe as an estimate is ours, not USTA’s. Match data is from USTA TennisLink.