Teams

Snyder 18s 6.5M Combo Mon PM

2026 Piedmont Combo 18 & Over · 6.5 18 & Over Men - Monday PM

12 players · average NTRP 3.25 / NORTH CAROLINA

View scouting list →
Schedule3 played
2026-08-24vs Whichard 18s 6.5M Combo Mon PMLost 12
L#1 DoublesGene LeFevre / Michael Clapp vs Lee Schneiderman / Arthur Gardiner1-6, 6-4, 0-1
W#2 DoublesDavid Grubbs / Gabriel Snyder vs Kevin Grubb / Dan Horan7-6, 6-1
L#3 DoublesJeff Cunningham / Jason Lewis vs Peter Uber / Bryan Bly6-7, 6-7
W#1 DoublesJason Lewis / Jeff Cunningham vs Jay Clayton / John Blackwood6-1, 6-0
L#2 DoublesArick Tuhro / Gabriel Snyder vs Jack Harrison / Muhammad Arida6-4, 4-6, 0-1
W#3 DoublesRohit Rajwade / David Vick vs William Sellers / Ed Brinskelle6-0, 6-2
2026-08-17vs Hilliard 18s 6.5M Combo Mon PMLost 12
L#1 DoublesJack Grubbs / Jeff Cunningham vs Chris Sigley / Lars Oestergaard3-6, 6-3, 0-1
L#2 DoublesLuke Mills / Gabriel Snyder vs Kevin Dover / Adrian Wezgowiec1-6, 1-6
W#3 DoublesMichael Clapp / Daniel Adams vs Anthony Bangay / Alex Williamson7-6, 3-6, 1-0
A tie can be incomplete. Tell us if someone is missing.
i
Grouped by tie — one fixture, several lines. A line shows only when a player on it is someone we have indexed, so an early-season tie for a newly-added team can look short. This also means the line count here will not match the header, which counts individual player appearances.

Flight standings for 6.5 18 & Over Men - Monday PM have not been collected yet. Where we have them we show every team in the flight ranked, with this team highlighted. The crawler is still filling in older seasons and flights.

ScoutingWhere each opponent usually plays

Signed-in extra: whether this captain plays strict strength order or mixes it up, from every doubles line they have put out. Create a free account to see it.

Roster averages 3.08 estimated across 12 rated players. No lineup is published in advance, so the column below is where each player has actually been used — a captain's habits are the best available forecast. Sign in and claim your record to see who you have played.

3.78
Rohit Rajwade
usually #1 Doubles 67%, also #3 Doubles 33% · published
3.48
David Grubbs
usually #2 Doubles 100% · published 3.5
3.42
Jason Lewis
usually #3 Doubles 50%, also #1 Doubles 50% · published
3.26
Michael Clapp
usually #1 Doubles 50%, also #3 Doubles 50% · published
3.21
Robert Chen
published 3.5
3.09
Gabriel Snyder
usually #2 Doubles 100% · published
2.98
Luke Mills
usually #2 Doubles 100% · published
2.90
Jeff Cunningham
usually #1 Doubles 67%, also #3 Doubles 33% · published
2.87
Arick Tuhro
usually #2 Doubles 100% · published 3
2.83
David Vick
usually #3 Doubles 100% · published 3
2.74
Gene LeFevre
usually #1 Doubles 100% · published
2.35
Ryan Augustine
published
Roster

Ordered by our estimated dynamic rating, which is why two players at the same published level are not tied — a published 4.0 says nothing about where inside the band someone sits. Lines played in this team’s season are shown beside each name.

Rohit Rajwade
43W–6L career · 3 lines in 2026
<1%2%98%
3.78
3.5
David Grubbs
27W–11L career · 1 line in 2026
<1%56%44%
3.48
Jason Lewis
29W–8L career · 2 lines in 2026
<1%71%29%
3.42
Michael Clapp
13W–23L career · 2 lines in 2026
3%93%4%
3.26
3.5
Robert Chen
55W–30L career · no lines in 2026
7%91%2%
3.21
Gabriel Snyder
24W–9L career · 3 lines in 2026
<1%26%74%
3.09
Luke Mills
9W–7L career · 1 line in 2026
<1%56%43%
2.98
Jeff Cunningham
31W–50L career · 3 lines in 2026
<1%77%23%
2.90
3
Arick Tuhro
27W–25L career · 1 line in 2026
<1%82%17%
2.87
3
David Vick
13W–17L career · 1 line in 2026
1%88%11%
2.83
Gene LeFevre
22W–38L career · 1 line in 2026
4%92%3%
2.74
Ryan Augustine
2W–18L career · no lines in 2026
86%14%<1%
2.35

Three percentages are where each player stands right now: the chance they are below their band, inside it, or above it, on the way they are playing this season. The number on the right is our estimated dynamic rating, which USTA never publishes. This is today rather than a forecast of December, because a forecast has to assume future matches and cannot know whether someone will even be offered them. Percentages are blank where a player has too few matches this season, or at a level where the model does not yet beat a base-rate guess; the estimate is a weaker claim than a probability and survives where those do not.

Not affiliated with or endorsed by the USTA. Ratings labelled as published are USTA year-end figures; anything we describe as an estimate is ours, not USTA’s. Match data is from USTA TennisLink.