Teams

12 Battery Park Line Painters - Boone

2025 Richmond Singles · Richmond Singles 3.0 Men

6 players · average NTRP 2.83 / VIRGINIA

View scouting list →
Schedule8 played
2025-11-10vs 11 Burkwood 3.0 - ButterworthWon 30
W#1 SinglesEdan Lyons vs Benjamin Bursae6-2, 6-1
W#2 SinglesChris Gaines vs Scott Childs6-3, 6-3
W#3 SinglesDylan Holt vs Scott Schoenwiesner7-6, 7-6
2025-11-05vs 1 Powhatan 3.0 Tennisbums - KelleyLost 03
L#1 SinglesChris Gaines vs Benjamin Pham6-7, 1-6
L#2 SinglesBenton Boone vs Allen Sleeman6-7, 1-6
L#3 SinglesChris Armstrong vs Richard Stowers1-6, 0-6
2025-11-02vs 4 CCV PahujaLost 12
L#1 SinglesEdan Lyons vs Noah Greenbaum6-4, 4-6, 0-1
W#2 SinglesChris Gaines vs Hugo Peris6-3, 6-1
L#3 SinglesChris Armstrong vs Ryan Grammer6-3, 2-6, 1-0
2025-10-29vs 9 Westwood SnyderLost 12
L#1 SinglesChris Gaines vs Kevin Gill2-6, 4-6
L#2 SinglesDylan Holt vs Cory Snyder2-6, 2-6
W#3 SinglesBenton Boone vs John Weiland6-7, 6-1, 1-0
2025-10-22vs 7 Westwood WestWon 21
W#1 SinglesDylan Holt vs Brian Kusiak6-0, 6-3
W#2 SinglesBenton Boone vs Zakk Lefkowits6-3, 6-1
L#3 SinglesChris Armstrong vs Ken West2-6, 5-7
2025-10-05vs 10 WOCC Mullinax 3.0Won 30
W#1 SinglesChris Gaines vs Steve Campbell7-5, 2-6, 1-0
W#2 SinglesBenton Boone vs Jim Kennedy6-3, 6-3
W#3 SinglesNicholas Daniel vs Charles Christianson7-5, 6-2
2025-10-01vs 6 Woodlake - ONeillSplit 11
W#1 SinglesDylan Holt vs Alfred Gamulo3-6, 6-2, 1-0
L#2 SinglesChris Armstrong vs Ryan Brown4-6, 7-6, 0-1
2025-09-29vs 13 Chestnut Oaks CoyleWon 21
W#1 SinglesChris Gaines vs Brian Gearing6-0, 6-2
W#2 SinglesBenton Boone vs Lucas Ward6-3, 6-2
L#3 SinglesChris Armstrong vs Marshall Powell1-6, 2-6
A tie can be incomplete. Tell us if someone is missing.
i
Grouped by tie — one fixture, several lines. A line shows only when a player on it is someone we have indexed, so an early-season tie for a newly-added team can look short. This also means the line count here will not match the header, which counts individual player appearances.

Flight standings for Richmond Singles 3.0 Men have not been collected yet. Where we have them we show every team in the flight ranked, with this team highlighted. The crawler is still filling in older seasons and flights.

ScoutingWhere each opponent usually plays

Signed-in extra: whether this captain plays strict strength order or mixes it up, from every doubles line they have put out. Create a free account to see it.

Roster averages 2.82 estimated across 5 rated players. No lineup is published in advance, so the column below is where each player has actually been used — a captain's habits are the best available forecast. Sign in and claim your record to see who you have played.

3.04
Chris Gaines
usually #1 Singles 67%, also #2 Singles 33% · published 3
2.95
Dylan Holt
usually #1 Singles 50%, also #2 Singles 25% · published
2.79
Nicholas Daniel
usually #3 Singles 100% · published
2.73
Benton Boone
usually #2 Singles 80%, also #3 Singles 20% · published 3
2.59
Chris Armstrong
usually #3 Singles 80%, also #2 Singles 20% · published 2.5
Edan Lyons
usually #1 Singles 100% · published
Established pairs

Doubles pairs from this roster with three or more matches together anywhere — ordered by performance against what the rating gap predicted, not by record.

Dylan Holt + Benton Boone5169% games+14.0% vs expected
Dylan Holt + Chris Armstrong5159% games+11.5% vs expected
Roster

Ordered by our estimated dynamic rating, which is why two players at the same published level are not tied — a published 4.0 says nothing about where inside the band someone sits. Lines played in this team’s season are shown beside each name.

3
Chris Gaines
15W–4L career · 6 lines in 2025
<1%39%61%
3.04
Dylan Holt
14W–4L career · 4 lines in 2025
<1%65%35%
2.95
Nicholas Daniel
8W–6L career · 1 line in 2025
2%92%6%
2.79
3
Benton Boone
11W–6L career · 5 lines in 2025
5%92%3%
2.73
2.5
Chris Armstrong
5W–7L career · 5 lines in 2025
0%25%75%
2.59
Edan Lyons
1W–1L career · 2 lines in 2025
not enough data

Three percentages are where each player stands right now: the chance they are below their band, inside it, or above it, on the way they are playing this season. The number on the right is our estimated dynamic rating, which USTA never publishes. This is today rather than a forecast of December, because a forecast has to assume future matches and cannot know whether someone will even be offered them. Percentages are blank where a player has too few matches this season, or at a level where the model does not yet beat a base-rate guess; the estimate is a weaker claim than a probability and survives where those do not.

Not affiliated with or endorsed by the USTA. Ratings labelled as published are USTA year-end figures; anything we describe as an estimate is ours, not USTA’s. Match data is from USTA TennisLink.