Teams

FK - Copeland

2023 Marion Adult 55 & Over · 7.0 Adult Women 55 & Over

11 players · average NTRP 3.67 / REGION_2

View scouting list →
Schedule8 played
2023-03-31Lost 01
L#3 DoublesEllen Perrone / Deborah Borge-Shaffer vs Kimberly Brewer / Delie Nichols2-6, 3-6
2023-03-25vs Villages - Eng/McCoyLost 01
L#2 DoublesEllen Perrone / Deborah Borge-Shaffer vs Mary Jeanne Walsh / Marcia Plante2-6, 6-3, 1-0
2023-03-04vs SKY - AcesLost 01
L#1 DoublesEllen Perrone / Barbara Tomyn vs Anna Olejnik-Mirra / Helen Sweeney4-6, 5-7
2023-02-25vs SMW - BrownWon 10
W#2 DoublesBarbara Tomyn / Ellen Perrone vs Haydee Siegel / Susan Felten6-7, 6-1, 1-0
2023-02-18vs MARION/DeMartino/Women/7.0Lost 01
L#1 DoublesEllen Perrone / Barbara Tomyn vs Judy Weber / Rita Meek2-6, 2-6
2023-02-11vs Villages - Hoops/BoscoWon 10
W#3 DoublesEllen Perrone / Marianne Zitnick vs Robin Lancaster / Judy King6-3, 7-5
2023-01-28vs SKY - AcesLost 01
L#2 DoublesEllen Perrone / Marianne Zitnick vs Anna Olejnik-Mirra / Helen Sweeney3-6, 3-6
2023-01-14vs MARION/DeMartino/Women/7.0Lost 02
L#1 DoublesEileen Lombardo / Monique Foster vs Judy Weber / Rayetta Spina4-6, 7-6, 1-0
L#2 DoublesJulie Haynes / Ellen Perrone vs Peggy Ridgway / Irma Buttermore2-6, 2-6
A tie can be incomplete. Tell us if someone is missing.
i
Grouped by tie — one fixture, several lines. A line shows only when a player on it is someone we have indexed, so an early-season tie for a newly-added team can look short. This also means the line count here will not match the header, which counts individual player appearances.

Flight standings for 7.0 Adult Women 55 & Over have not been collected yet. Where we have them we show every team in the flight ranked, with this team highlighted. The crawler is still filling in older seasons and flights.

ScoutingWhere each opponent usually plays

Signed-in extra: whether this captain plays strict strength order or mixes it up, from every doubles line they have put out. Create a free account to see it.

Roster averages 3.14 estimated across 6 rated players. No lineup is published in advance, so the column below is where each player has actually been used — a captain's habits are the best available forecast. Sign in and claim your record to see who you have played.

3.87
Eileen Lombardo
usually #1 Doubles 50%, also #2 Doubles 38% · published 4
Carmen Rosario
published 3.5
3.20
3.12
Ellen Perrone
usually #2 Doubles 50%, also #3 Doubles 25% · published
3.03
Victoria McClintock
published
2.88
Donna Sullivan
published
2.75
Margie McLellan
published
Hera Peterson
published
Julie Haynes
published
Marianne Zitnick
published
Monique Foster
published
Roster

Ordered by our estimated dynamic rating, which is why two players at the same published level are not tied — a published 4.0 says nothing about where inside the band someone sits. Lines played in this team’s season are shown beside each name.

4
Eileen Lombardo
304W–158L career · 8 lines in 2023
<1%82%18%
3.87
3.5
Carmen Rosario
0W–3L career · no lines in 2023
not enough data
3.5
Deborah Borge-Shaffer
5W–4L career · no lines in 2023
8%91%2%
3.20
Ellen Perrone
88W–117L career · 8 lines in 2023
19%81%<1%
3.12
Victoria McClintock
10W–11L career · no lines in 2023
43%57%<1%
3.03
Donna Sullivan
1W–3L career · no lines in 2023
81%19%<1%
2.88
Margie McLellan
12W–11L career · no lines in 2023
3%93%4%
2.75
Hera Peterson
1W–1L career · no lines in 2023
not enough data
Julie Haynes
10W–1L career · no lines in 2023
not enough data
Marianne Zitnick
0W–3L career · no lines in 2023
not enough data
Monique Foster
1W–1L career · no lines in 2023
not enough data

Three percentages are where each player stands right now: the chance they are below their band, inside it, or above it, on the way they are playing this season. The number on the right is our estimated dynamic rating, which USTA never publishes. This is today rather than a forecast of December, because a forecast has to assume future matches and cannot know whether someone will even be offered them. Percentages are blank where a player has too few matches this season, or at a level where the model does not yet beat a base-rate guess; the estimate is a weaker claim than a probability and survives where those do not.

Not affiliated with or endorsed by the USTA. Ratings labelled as published are USTA year-end figures; anything we describe as an estimate is ours, not USTA’s. Match data is from USTA TennisLink.