Teams

Louden

2024 Charles Combo · Charles Combo 6.5 Women

8 players · average NTRP 3.38 / MARYLAND

View scouting list →
Schedule7 played
2024-11-09vs Walker/HuntingtonWon 10
W#1 DoublesCasey Royster / MATITIA SEALE COMMISSIONG vs Tamara Davis / Stephanie Smith7-5, 6-2
2024-11-03vs Walker/HuntingtonWon 20
W#1 DoublesTosha Clark / LaTonya Young-Clayborne vs Karolyn Clarke / Kaitlyn Rios6-3, 6-3
W#3 DoublesMATITIA SEALE COMMISSIONG / Janaya Thompson vs Laura Huntington / Aaliyah Robertson6-2, 6-0
2024-11-02vs Walker/HuntingtonWon 10
W#2 DoublesCasey Royster / Kimberly White vs Tia Rollins / Laura Huntington6-1, 6-1
2024-10-13vs Walker/HuntingtonLost 01
L#3 DoublesPatricia Louden / Janaya Thompson vs Karolyn Clarke / Kaitlyn Rios5-7, 4-6
2024-10-12vs Walker/HuntingtonWon 20
W#1 DoublesTosha Clark / LaTonya Young-Clayborne vs Karolyn Clarke / Valerie Carpenter6-2, 6-7, 1-0
W#2 DoublesCasey Royster / Danielle Gorman vs Michelle Johnson / Takeysha Robinson6-3, 7-6
2024-10-06Won 10
W#2 DoublesMATITIA SEALE COMMISSIONG / Janaya Thompson vs Kaitlyn Rios / Aaliyah Robertson6-0, 6-1
2024-10-05vs Walker/HuntingtonWon 20
W#2 DoublesTosha Clark / MATITIA SEALE COMMISSIONG vs Michelle Johnson / Takeysha Robinson6-3, 6-1
W#3 DoublesREGINA DAVIS / Casey Royster vs Mia Dozier / Darlene Walker6-2, 5-6
A tie can be incomplete. Tell us if someone is missing.
i
Grouped by tie — one fixture, several lines. A line shows only when a player on it is someone we have indexed, so an early-season tie for a newly-added team can look short. This also means the line count here will not match the header, which counts individual player appearances.

Flight standings for Charles Combo 6.5 Women have not been collected yet. Where we have them we show every team in the flight ranked, with this team highlighted. The crawler is still filling in older seasons and flights.

ScoutingWhere each opponent usually plays

Signed-in extra: whether this captain plays strict strength order or mixes it up, from every doubles line they have put out. Create a free account to see it.

Roster averages 3.11 estimated across 8 rated players. No lineup is published in advance, so the column below is where each player has actually been used — a captain's habits are the best available forecast. Sign in and claim your record to see who you have played.

3.37
MATITIA SEALE COMMISSIONG
usually #2 Doubles 50%, also #3 Doubles 25% · published 3.5
3.37
LaTonya Young-Clayborne
usually #1 Doubles 100% · published 3.5
3.31
Casey Royster
usually #2 Doubles 50%, also #3 Doubles 25% · published 3.5
3.09
Kimberly White
published
3.02
REGINA DAVIS
published
2.99
Patricia Louden
published
2.97
Tosha Clark
published
2.80
Janaya Thompson
usually #3 Doubles 67%, also #2 Doubles 33% · published 3
Established pairs

Doubles pairs from this roster with three or more matches together anywhere — ordered by performance against what the rating gap predicted, not by record.

Casey Royster + MATITIA SEALE COMMISSIONG314 matchesnot enough data
Roster

Ordered by our estimated dynamic rating, which is why two players at the same published level are not tied — a published 4.0 says nothing about where inside the band someone sits. Lines played in this team’s season are shown beside each name.

3.5
MATITIA SEALE COMMISSIONG
137W–72L career · 4 lines in 2024
<1%84%16%
3.37
3.5
LaTonya Young-Clayborne
99W–83L career · 2 lines in 2024
<1%85%15%
3.37
3.5
Casey Royster
192W–200L career · 4 lines in 2024
1%92%7%
3.31
Kimberly White
1W–4L career · no lines in 2024
25%75%<1%
3.09
REGINA DAVIS
4W–10L career · no lines in 2024
44%56%<1%
3.02
Patricia Louden
12W–9L career · no lines in 2024
<1%54%46%
2.99
Tosha Clark
54W–37L career · no lines in 2024
<1%59%41%
2.97
3
Janaya Thompson
69W–56L career · 3 lines in 2024
1%93%6%
2.80

Three percentages are where each player stands right now: the chance they are below their band, inside it, or above it, on the way they are playing this season. The number on the right is our estimated dynamic rating, which USTA never publishes. This is today rather than a forecast of December, because a forecast has to assume future matches and cannot know whether someone will even be offered them. Percentages are blank where a player has too few matches this season, or at a level where the model does not yet beat a base-rate guess; the estimate is a weaker claim than a probability and survives where those do not.

Not affiliated with or endorsed by the USTA. Ratings labelled as published are USTA year-end figures; anything we describe as an estimate is ours, not USTA’s. Match data is from USTA TennisLink.