Teams

Midtown

2026 Tri Level Women · 4.0,3.5,3.0

18 players · average NTRP 3.44 / WESTERN REGION

View scouting list →
Schedule8 played
2026-04-25vs Chicks with SticksLost 12
L#1 DoublesKim Bender / Alina Santiago vs Laurie Saffran / Cynthia Medley-Evanetski3-6, 0-6
L#2 DoublesCaroline Kurzweil / Monica Hodis vs Teresa Metcalfe / Norah Hegarty6-7, 3-6
W#3 DoublesJODIE BORLAUG / Amanda Coffey vs Theresa Croce / Sara Kelch6-3, 7-6
2026-04-19vs Sweet SpotsLost 12
L#1 DoublesAlina Santiago / Tarsha Davis vs Lydia Varon / Mari Fitzsimmons5-7, 6-7
L#2 DoublesElizabeth Johnson / Carly Krystyniak vs Carly Napier / Sharon Napier2-6, 0-6
W#3 DoublesElizabeth Sharpe / Amanda Spencer vs Nicole Sayers / Susan Reynolds3-6, 6-1, 1-0
2026-04-11vs ROC: Net BreakersLost 03
L#1 DoublesAlina Santiago / Monica Cherry vs Ashlen Grote / Kristen Zablonski1-6, 2-6
L#2 DoublesElizabeth Johnson / Sarah Fisher vs Kathleen Savage / Kathleen Spellane3-6, 5-7
L#3 DoublesAmy Bennage / JODIE BORLAUG vs Jennifer Ponce / Stephanie Corey7-6, 4-6, 0-1
2026-03-22vs Love-Love LadiesWon 21
L#1 DoublesAlina Santiago / Grace Kurzweil vs Kaitlynn Arias / Tanya Zutshi6-7, 4-6
W#2 DoublesKim Bender / Joanne Parkes vs Sandra Chu / Cheryl Gossin6-1, 6-0
W#3 DoublesAmanda Coffey / Carolina Gonzalez vs Liping Jia / Allison O'Malley7-5, 6-1
2026-03-14vs Chicks with SticksLost 03
L#1 DoublesAlina Santiago / Monica Cherry vs Heather Burke / Laurie Saffran1-6, 6-3, 0-1
L#2 DoublesCarly Krystyniak / Monica Hodis vs Kristi Seaver / Tricia Rupright1-6, 4-6
L#3 DoublesCarolina Gonzalez / Elizabeth Sharpe vs Karen Bentley / Grace Miller2-6, 2-6
2026-03-08vs Sweet SpotsLost 03
L#1 DoublesGrace Kurzweil / Alina Santiago vs Marcia Brayer / Mari Fitzsimmons6-7, 5-7
L#2 DoublesKim Bender / Caroline Kurzweil vs Mary-Beth Rumble / Taylor Veenema5-7, 0-6
L#3 DoublesAmanda Spencer / Carolina Gonzalez vs Lynne Shoars / Nicole Sayers7-5, 1-6, 0-1
2026-02-28vs ROC: Net BreakersLost 03
L#1 DoublesAlina Santiago / Monica Cherry vs Alice Lewis-Hickey / Ashlen Grote3-6, 2-6
L#2 DoublesJoanne Parkes / Caroline Kurzweil vs Debra Go / Carol Eisenman4-6, 6-7
L#3 DoublesAmy Bennage / Amanda Spencer vs Jennifer Ponce / Katie Shepard2-6, 4-6
2026-02-13vs Love-Love LadiesWon 21
L#1 DoublesCarly Krystyniak / Alina Santiago vs Kaitlynn Arias / Tanya Zutshi4-6, 1-6
W#2 DoublesElizabeth Johnson / Joanne Parkes vs Jing Zhang / Sandra Chu6-2, 6-3
W#3 DoublesAmanda Spencer / Elizabeth Sharpe vs Shelby George / Liping Jia5-7, 6-2, 1-0
A tie can be incomplete. Tell us if someone is missing.
i
Grouped by tie — one fixture, several lines. A line shows only when a player on it is someone we have indexed, so an early-season tie for a newly-added team can look short. This also means the line count here will not match the header, which counts individual player appearances.

Flight standings for 4.0,3.5,3.0 have not been collected yet. Where we have them we show every team in the flight ranked, with this team highlighted. The crawler is still filling in older seasons and flights.

ScoutingWhere each opponent usually plays

Signed-in extra: whether this captain plays strict strength order or mixes it up, from every doubles line they have put out. Create a free account to see it.

Roster averages 3.29 estimated across 16 rated players. No lineup is published in advance, so the column below is where each player has actually been used — a captain's habits are the best available forecast. Sign in and claim your record to see who you have played.

4.08
Virginia Crandall
published 4.5
3.76
Alina Santiago
usually #1 Doubles 100% · published 4
3.71
Grace Kurzweil
usually #1 Doubles 100% · published
3.59
Tarsha Davis
usually #1 Doubles 100% · published
3.48
Joanne Parkes
usually #2 Doubles 100% · published
3.40
Monica Cherry
usually #1 Doubles 100% · published
3.33
Elizabeth Johnson
usually #2 Doubles 100% · published
3.25
3.14
Amanda Spencer
usually #3 Doubles 100% · published 3
3.11
Monica Hodis
usually #2 Doubles 100% · published
3.10
Carly Krystyniak
usually #2 Doubles 67%, also #1 Doubles 33% · published 3.5
3.10
Carolina Gonzalez
usually #3 Doubles 100% · published 3
2.99
JODIE BORLAUG
usually #3 Doubles 100% · published
2.98
Caroline Kurzweil
usually #2 Doubles 100% · published 3.5
2.90
Elizabeth Sharpe
usually #3 Doubles 100% · published
2.77
Amy Bennage
usually #3 Doubles 100% · published 3
Amanda Coffey
usually #3 Doubles 100% · published 3
Sarah Fisher
usually #2 Doubles 100% · published
Established pairs

Doubles pairs from this roster with three or more matches together anywhere — ordered by performance against what the rating gap predicted, not by record.

Caroline Kurzweil + Joanne Parkes134 matchesnot enough data
Alina Santiago + Monica Cherry134 matchesnot enough data
Roster

Ordered by our estimated dynamic rating, which is why two players at the same published level are not tied — a published 4.0 says nothing about where inside the band someone sits. Lines played in this team’s season are shown beside each name.

4.5
Virginia Crandall
73W–69L career · no lines in 2026
27%72%<1%
4.08
4
Alina Santiago
7W–11L career · type S · 8 lines in 2026
3%92%4%
3.76
Grace Kurzweil
10W–12L career · 2 lines in 2026
7%91%2%
3.71
Tarsha Davis
69W–30L career · 1 line in 2026
25%75%<1%
3.59
Joanne Parkes
34W–44L career · 3 lines in 2026
55%45%<1%
3.48
Monica Cherry
2W–8L career · 3 lines in 2026
77%23%<1%
3.40
Elizabeth Johnson
10W–7L career · 3 lines in 2026
89%11%<1%
3.33
Sandra Nakandakari Higa
3W–4L career · no lines in 2026
3%93%4%
3.25
3
Amanda Spencer
29W–18L career · 4 lines in 2026
<1%16%84%
3.14
Monica Hodis
25W–37L career · 2 lines in 2026
21%78%<1%
3.11
3.5
Carly Krystyniak
3W–17L career · 3 lines in 2026
23%77%<1%
3.10
3
Carolina Gonzalez
4W–9L career · 3 lines in 2026
<1%24%76%
3.10
JODIE BORLAUG
23W–52L career · 2 lines in 2026
<1%52%48%
2.99
3.5
Caroline Kurzweil
15W–29L career · 3 lines in 2026
55%45%<1%
2.98
Elizabeth Sharpe
8W–3L career · 3 lines in 2026
<1%76%24%
2.90
3
Amy Bennage
1W–6L career · type S · 2 lines in 2026
3%92%5%
2.77
3
Amanda Coffey
2W–0L career · type S · 2 lines in 2026
not enough data
Sarah Fisher
2W–17L career · 1 line in 2026
not enough data

Three percentages are where each player stands right now: the chance they are below their band, inside it, or above it, on the way they are playing this season. The number on the right is our estimated dynamic rating, which USTA never publishes. This is today rather than a forecast of December, because a forecast has to assume future matches and cannot know whether someone will even be offered them. Percentages are blank where a player has too few matches this season, or at a level where the model does not yet beat a base-rate guess; the estimate is a weaker claim than a probability and survives where those do not.

Not affiliated with or endorsed by the USTA. Ratings labelled as published are USTA year-end figures; anything we describe as an estimate is ours, not USTA’s. Match data is from USTA TennisLink.