Teams

JTC - Dell/Fuller

2022 Alachua Adult 40 & Over · 4.0 Adult 40 & Over - Women

10 players · average NTRP 4.00 / REGION_2

View scouting list →
Schedule6 played
2022-05-22vs ALACHUA - DB - Almond/MolyneuxLost 02
L#1 DoublesAlison Andrus / Kim Magee vs MEGAN MOLYNEUX / Nancy Embree2-6, 1-6
L#3 DoublesMary Cribb / Kannika Torres vs Caroline Hord / Celia Martin6-4, 5-7, 0-1
2022-05-05vs ALACHUA - DB - Almond/MolyneuxLost 01
L#1 DoublesMary Cribb / Lan Hoang-Minh vs Nancy Embree / Debbie McMillan1-6, 1-6
2022-04-29vs ALACHUA - DB - Almond/MolyneuxSplit 11
W#2 DoublesAlison Andrus / Amanda Fuller vs Wheeler Crawford / Caroline Hord6-0, 6-3
L#3 DoublesMarisa McLeod / Jigisha Shah vs Heather Gibson / Celia Martin4-6, 2-6
2022-04-14vs ALACHUA - DB - Almond/MolyneuxSplit 11
W#1 DoublesAlison Andrus / Samantha Walton vs Elaine Almond / Heather Gibson6-0, 7-5
L#3 DoublesJigisha Shah / Marisa McLeod vs Caroline Hord / Julie Mah1-6, 1-6
2022-04-12vs ALACHUA - DB - Almond/MolyneuxWon 10
W#1 DoublesAlison Andrus / Samantha Walton vs Elaine Almond / Heather Gibson6-7, 6-1, 1-0
2022-04-10Lost 01
L#2 DoublesMary Cribb / Jigisha Shah vs Dorie Frum / Gwendolyn Crispell3-6, 3-6
A tie can be incomplete. Tell us if someone is missing.
i
Grouped by tie — one fixture, several lines. A line shows only when a player on it is someone we have indexed, so an early-season tie for a newly-added team can look short. This also means the line count here will not match the header, which counts individual player appearances.

Flight standings for 4.0 Adult 40 & Over - Women have not been collected yet. Where we have them we show every team in the flight ranked, with this team highlighted. The crawler is still filling in older seasons and flights.

ScoutingWhere each opponent usually plays

Signed-in extra: whether this captain plays strict strength order or mixes it up, from every doubles line they have put out. Create a free account to see it.

Roster averages 3.37 estimated across 6 rated players. No lineup is published in advance, so the column below is where each player has actually been used — a captain's habits are the best available forecast. Sign in and claim your record to see who you have played.

3.85
Alison Andrus
usually #1 Doubles 75%, also #2 Doubles 25% · published 4
3.53
Kim Magee
published
3.46
Allison Shinn
published 4
3.35
Kannika Torres
published
3.08
Jigisha Shah
published
2.98
Vicki Johnson
published
Marisa McLeod
usually #3 Doubles 100% · published
Mary Cribb
usually #2 Doubles 33%, also #1 Doubles 33% · published
Michelle Ivanowski
published
Peggi Bockman
published
Established pairs

Doubles pairs from this roster with three or more matches together anywhere — ordered by performance against what the rating gap predicted, not by record.

Alison Andrus + Kim Magee1537% games−8.6% vs expected
Peggi Bockman + Alison Andrus4352% gamesnot enough data
Roster

Ordered by our estimated dynamic rating, which is why two players at the same published level are not tied — a published 4.0 says nothing about where inside the band someone sits. Lines played in this team’s season are shown beside each name.

4
Alison Andrus
79W–67L career · 4 lines in 2022
<1%87%12%
3.85
Kim Magee
11W–13L career · no lines in 2022
42%58%<1%
3.53
4
Allison Shinn
0W–3L career · no lines in 2022
61%39%<1%
3.46
Kannika Torres
12W–11L career · no lines in 2022
<1%88%12%
3.35
Jigisha Shah
7W–10L career · no lines in 2022
27%73%<1%
3.08
Vicki Johnson
0W–4L career · no lines in 2022
56%44%<1%
2.98
Marisa McLeod
81W–60L career · 2 lines in 2022
not enough data
Mary Cribb
34W–56L career · 3 lines in 2022
not enough data
Michelle Ivanowski
8W–2L career · no lines in 2022
not enough data
Peggi Bockman
30W–28L career · no lines in 2022
not enough data

Three percentages are where each player stands right now: the chance they are below their band, inside it, or above it, on the way they are playing this season. The number on the right is our estimated dynamic rating, which USTA never publishes. This is today rather than a forecast of December, because a forecast has to assume future matches and cannot know whether someone will even be offered them. Percentages are blank where a player has too few matches this season, or at a level where the model does not yet beat a base-rate guess; the estimate is a weaker claim than a probability and survives where those do not.

Not affiliated with or endorsed by the USTA. Ratings labelled as published are USTA year-end figures; anything we describe as an estimate is ours, not USTA’s. Match data is from USTA TennisLink.