Teams

LA-LLW-Sets on Fire-Debbie Halim

2024 SoCal Doubles - LA · LA - Men 5.0+

10 players · average NTRP 5.00 / SO.CALIFORNIA

View scouting list →
Schedule5 played
2024-12-11vs LA - LA RoundersWon 20
W#1 DoublesMaalik Konop-Defreitas / Henry Mak vs Cameron Coe / Hans Hettich6-3, 6-3
W#1 SinglesBrett Buford vs Greg Bekkers6-0, 6-3
2024-11-10vs LA - Team QuanLost 02
L#1 DoublesParker Duda / Maalik Konop-Defreitas vs Stefan Cutovic / Javeed Kassam6-4, 4-6, 0-1
L#1 SinglesHenry Mak vs Eric Lee5-7, 3-6
2024-11-03vs LA - LA RoundersWon 20
W#1 DoublesParker Duda / Maalik Konop-Defreitas vs Greg Bekkers / Jeremy Mitchell6-2, 6-2
W#1 SinglesBrett Buford vs Joshua Friedman6-4, 6-1
2024-10-19vs LA - LA RoundersWon 21
W#1 DoublesParker Duda / Joshua Quijano vs Bruce Man-Son-Hing / Roberto Rodriguez6-4, 1-6, 1-0
W#1 SinglesHenry Mak vs Sam Johnson6-1, 6-0
L#2 DoublesMiguel Cepeda / Tuji Chang vs Greg Bekkers / Jeremy Mitchell1-6, 1-6
2024-10-12vs LA - Team QuanWon 20
W#1 DoublesMaalik Konop-Defreitas / Henry Mak vs Hunter Kettering / Joseph Lok1-6, 6-3, 1-0
W#2 DoublesAmit Gupta / Joshua Quijano vs Javeed Kassam / Andrew Mawire6-3, 6-7, 1-0
A tie can be incomplete. Tell us if someone is missing.
i
Grouped by tie — one fixture, several lines. A line shows only when a player on it is someone we have indexed, so an early-season tie for a newly-added team can look short. This also means the line count here will not match the header, which counts individual player appearances.

Flight standings for LA - Men 5.0+ have not been collected yet. Where we have them we show every team in the flight ranked, with this team highlighted. The crawler is still filling in older seasons and flights.

ScoutingWhere each opponent usually plays

Signed-in extra: whether this captain plays strict strength order or mixes it up, from every doubles line they have put out. Create a free account to see it.

Roster averages 4.52 estimated across 5 rated players. No lineup is published in advance, so the column below is where each player has actually been used — a captain's habits are the best available forecast. Sign in and claim your record to see who you have played.

4.79
Henry Mak
usually #1 Doubles 50%, also #1 Singles 50% · published
4.72
Brett Buford
usually #1 Singles 100% · published 5
4.71
Maalik Konop-Defreitas
usually #1 Doubles 100% · published
4.39
Emmanuel Fortune
published
4.02
Amit Gupta
usually #2 Doubles 100% · published 5
Frederik Vig
published
Joshua Quijano
usually #1 Doubles 50%, also #2 Doubles 50% · published
Miguel Cepeda
usually #2 Doubles 100% · published
Parker Duda
usually #1 Doubles 100% · published
Tuji Chang
usually #2 Doubles 100% · published
Roster

Ordered by our estimated dynamic rating, which is why two players at the same published level are not tied — a published 4.0 says nothing about where inside the band someone sits. Lines played in this team’s season are shown beside each name.

Henry Mak
10W–4L career · 4 lines in 2024
no projection at this level
4.79
5
Brett Buford
6W–3L career · 2 lines in 2024
no projection at this level
4.72
Maalik Konop-Defreitas
5W–5L career · 4 lines in 2024
no projection at this level
4.71
Emmanuel Fortune
9W–2L career · no lines in 2024
<1%78%22%
4.39
5
Amit Gupta
7W–2L career · 1 line in 2024
no projection at this level
4.02
Frederik Vig
1W–4L career · no lines in 2024
not enough data
Joshua Quijano
11W–4L career · 2 lines in 2024
not enough data
Miguel Cepeda
0W–1L career · 1 line in 2024
not enough data
Parker Duda
3W–2L career · 3 lines in 2024
not enough data
Tuji Chang
0W–1L career · 1 line in 2024
not enough data

Three percentages are where each player stands right now: the chance they are below their band, inside it, or above it, on the way they are playing this season. The number on the right is our estimated dynamic rating, which USTA never publishes. This is today rather than a forecast of December, because a forecast has to assume future matches and cannot know whether someone will even be offered them. Percentages are blank where a player has too few matches this season, or at a level where the model does not yet beat a base-rate guess; the estimate is a weaker claim than a probability and survives where those do not.

Not affiliated with or endorsed by the USTA. Ratings labelled as published are USTA year-end figures; anything we describe as an estimate is ours, not USTA’s. Match data is from USTA TennisLink.