Teams

JDiamond 8.5 combo

2022 Capital Combo 55 & Over · 8.5 Men

6 players · average NTRP 4.00 / NORTH CAROLINA

View scouting list →
Schedule9 played
2022-10-10vs JVanDeWater(55+ Combo)Won 20
W#2 DoublesKen Nowell / Hai Le vs Wes Talton / Steven Miller6-3, 7-6
W#3 DoublesKen Lawton / Scott Anderson vs John VanDeWater / Eric Herr6-3, 6-3
2022-10-03vs JMADIASplit 11
L#1 DoublesKen Lawton / Hai Le vs Jeffrey Madia / Scott Riley3-6, 4-6
W#2 DoublesJohn Diamond / Ken Nowell vs Randy Lakey / Duncan McGrew6-3, 6-4
2022-09-27vs JMADIAWon 10
W#2 DoublesJohn Diamond / Ken Nowell vs Randy Lakey / Tom Stevens6-3, 6-3
2022-09-26vs IJSageSplit 11
L#2 DoublesKen Nowell / Tom Sparks vs Wally Hinkleman / Wes Snead2-6, 6-3, 1-0
W#3 DoublesJeffrey Monaghen / Ken Lawton vs Tony Houser / Terry Holder6-4, 6-2
2022-09-19vs JVanDeWater(55+ Combo)Lost 01
L#1 DoublesKen Lawton / Hai Le vs John VanDeWater / Dayn Harum3-6, 4-6
2022-08-29vs IJSageWon 10
W#1 DoublesKen Lawton / Jeffrey Monaghen vs Wes Snead / John Gearing6-1, 6-3
2022-08-22vs JVanDeWater(55+ Combo)Won 21
W#1 DoublesKen Lawton / Hai Le vs Craig Pleasants / Wes Talton7-5, 6-4
L#2 DoublesJohn Diamond / Ken Nowell vs Ray Goldberg / Dayn Harum2-6, 6-7
W#3 DoublesDan Allen / Jeffrey Monaghen vs Daniel Murphy / Rick Pfeiffer2-6, 6-4, 1-0
2022-08-17vs IJSageLost 02
L#1 DoublesHai Le / Ken Nowell vs Terry Holder / Jason Sage7-5, 4-6, 0-1
L#2 DoublesKen Lawton / Dan Allen vs Nile Testerman / Joe Murphy5-7, 4-6
2022-08-15vs JMADIALost 02
L#2 DoublesKen Glanville / Jeffrey Monaghen vs David Bell / Roger Kurtz3-6, 0-6
L#3 DoublesJohn Diamond / Ken Nowell vs Jeffrey Madia / W Troutman2-6, 7-5, 0-1
A tie can be incomplete. Tell us if someone is missing.
i
Grouped by tie — one fixture, several lines. A line shows only when a player on it is someone we have indexed, so an early-season tie for a newly-added team can look short. This also means the line count here will not match the header, which counts individual player appearances.

Flight standings for 8.5 Men have not been collected yet. Where we have them we show every team in the flight ranked, with this team highlighted. The crawler is still filling in older seasons and flights.

ScoutingWhere each opponent usually plays

Signed-in extra: whether this captain plays strict strength order or mixes it up, from every doubles line they have put out. Create a free account to see it.

Roster averages 3.69 estimated across 6 rated players. No lineup is published in advance, so the column below is where each player has actually been used — a captain's habits are the best available forecast. Sign in and claim your record to see who you have played.

3.87
John Diamond
published
3.81
Ken Lawton
usually #3 Doubles 50%, also #1 Doubles 33% · published 4
3.77
Ken Nowell
usually #2 Doubles 57%, also #3 Doubles 21% · published 4
3.65
Jeffrey Monaghen
usually #3 Doubles 50%, also #2 Doubles 25% · published 4
3.62
Hai Le
published 4
3.44
Ken Glanville
published
Established pairs

Doubles pairs from this roster with three or more matches together anywhere — ordered by performance against what the rating gap predicted, not by record.

John Diamond + Ken Nowell6166% games+3.1% vs expected
Jeffrey Monaghen + Ken Lawton8459% games−4.6% vs expected
Ken Lawton + Ken Nowell10753% games−5.4% vs expected
Roster

Ordered by our estimated dynamic rating, which is why two players at the same published level are not tied — a published 4.0 says nothing about where inside the band someone sits. Lines played in this team’s season are shown beside each name.

John Diamond
14W–4L career · no lines in 2022
<1%84%16%
3.87
4
Ken Lawton
96W–65L career · 12 lines in 2022
1%92%7%
3.81
4
Ken Nowell
211W–147L career · 14 lines in 2022
2%94%4%
3.77
4
Jeffrey Monaghen
181W–208L career · 4 lines in 2022
13%87%<1%
3.65
4
Hai Le
7W–13L career · no lines in 2022
18%82%<1%
3.62
Ken Glanville
19W–23L career · no lines in 2022
<1%69%31%
3.44

Three percentages are where each player stands right now: the chance they are below their band, inside it, or above it, on the way they are playing this season. The number on the right is our estimated dynamic rating, which USTA never publishes. This is today rather than a forecast of December, because a forecast has to assume future matches and cannot know whether someone will even be offered them. Percentages are blank where a player has too few matches this season, or at a level where the model does not yet beat a base-rate guess; the estimate is a weaker claim than a probability and survives where those do not.

Not affiliated with or endorsed by the USTA. Ratings labelled as published are USTA year-end figures; anything we describe as an estimate is ours, not USTA’s. Match data is from USTA TennisLink.