Teams

Earnest 6.5 Combo

COMBO 40 & OVER · 6.5 WOMEN

11 players · average NTRP 3.38 / NORTH CAROLINA

No matches recorded for this roster in this league — it may be a placeholder registration, or the season may not have started.

View scouting list →
Schedule8 played
2025-10-09vs ROHAN/SAMSON TerminettersLost 12
W#1 DoublesClaire Modecki / Robin Morris vs Janis Collins / Linda Hellman6-1, 6-0
L#2 DoublesAndrea Watkins / Denise Michaud vs Brooke Samson / Diane Rohan7-5, 3-6, 0-1
L#3 DoublesKaryl Rhodes / Betsy Williams vs Megan Fogle / Anna Hite4-6, 1-6
2025-10-02vs ROHAN/SAMSON TerminettersLost 12
L#1 DoublesChristine Kelly / Denise Michaud vs Brooke Samson / Nicole Bouker1-6, 1-6
W#2 DoublesClaire Modecki / Karyl Rhodes vs Tam Oros / Inna Pencheva7-6, 0-6, 1-0
L#3 DoublesSharon Sawyer / Stephanie Wills vs Deborah Beddingfield / Avery Harrison5-7, 6-7
2025-09-25vs ROHAN/SAMSON TerminettersLost 03
L#1 DoublesRobin Morris / Stephanie Wills vs Brooke Samson / Anna Hite2-6, 4-6
L#2 DoublesChristine Kelly / Betsy Williams vs Janet Colegrove / Linda Hellman6-7, 2-6
L#3 DoublesKaryl Rhodes / Rachel Farmer vs Deborah Beddingfield / Nicole Bouker1-6, 3-6
2025-09-18vs ROHAN/SAMSON TerminettersLost 02
L#1 DoublesMandy Earnest / Stephanie Wills vs Brooke Samson / Inna Pencheva0-6, 2-6
L#2 DoublesSummer Copeland / Denise Michaud vs Megan Fogle / MAUREEN Montgomery2-6, 0-6
2025-09-11vs ROHAN/SAMSON TerminettersLost 03
L#1 DoublesStephanie Wills / Karyl Rhodes vs Tam Oros / Inna Pencheva3-6, 1-6
L#2 DoublesWendy Sullivan / Christine Kelly vs Diane Rohan / Linda Hellman7-5, 3-6, 0-1
L#3 DoublesRachel Farmer / Andrea Watkins vs Deborah Beddingfield / Jeanne O Grady3-6, 4-6
2025-09-04vs ROHAN/SAMSON TerminettersLost 12
W#1 DoublesClaire Modecki / Robin Morris vs Megan Fogle / Avery Harrison6-3, 6-0
L#2 DoublesRachel Farmer / Andrea Watkins vs Brooke Samson / Inna Pencheva1-6, 1-6
L#3 DoublesJennifer Lunceford / Denise Michaud vs Tam Oros / Diane Rohan0-6, 2-6
2025-08-28vs ROHAN/SAMSON TerminettersLost 12
W#1 DoublesStephanie Wills / Mandy Earnest vs Jeanne O Grady / Linda Hellman4-6, 6-3, 1-0
L#2 DoublesClaire Modecki / Jennifer Lunceford vs Brooke Samson / Inna Pencheva1-6, 5-7
L#3 DoublesWendy Sullivan / Denise Michaud vs Deborah Beddingfield / Nicole Bouker1-6, 2-6
2025-08-25vs ROHAN/SAMSON TerminettersSplit 11
L#1 DoublesAndrea Watkins / Stephanie Wills vs Brooke Samson / MAUREEN Montgomery4-6, 5-7
W#3 DoublesClaire Modecki / Jennifer Lunceford vs Tam Oros / Janis Collins6-2, 7-6
A tie can be incomplete. Tell us if someone is missing.
i
Grouped by tie — one fixture, several lines. A line shows only when a player on it is someone we have indexed, so an early-season tie for a newly-added team can look short. This also means the line count here will not match the header, which counts individual player appearances.

Flight standings for 6.5 WOMEN have not been collected yet. Where we have them we show every team in the flight ranked, with this team highlighted. The crawler is still filling in older seasons and flights.

ScoutingWhere each opponent usually plays

Signed-in extra: whether this captain plays strict strength order or mixes it up, from every doubles line they have put out. Create a free account to see it.

Roster averages 3.17 estimated across 9 rated players. No lineup is published in advance, so the column below is where each player has actually been used — a captain's habits are the best available forecast. Sign in and claim your record to see who you have played.

3.45
Claire Modecki
usually #2 Doubles 40%, also #1 Doubles 40% · published 3.5
3.35
Robin Morris
usually #1 Doubles 100% · published
3.29
Andrea Watkins
usually #2 Doubles 50%, also #1 Doubles 25% · published 3.5
3.22
Christine Kelly
usually #2 Doubles 67%, also #1 Doubles 33% · published 3.5
3.20
Karyl Rhodes
usually #3 Doubles 50%, also #2 Doubles 25% · published
3.15
Stephanie Wills
usually #1 Doubles 83%, also #3 Doubles 17% · published
3.02
Jennifer Lunceford
usually #3 Doubles 67%, also #2 Doubles 33% · published
2.97
Summer Copeland
usually #2 Doubles 100% · published
2.83
Mandy Earnest
usually #1 Doubles 100% · published
Denise Michaud
usually #3 Doubles 40%, also #2 Doubles 40% · published 3
Wendy Sullivan
usually #3 Doubles 50%, also #2 Doubles 50% · published
Established pairs

Doubles pairs from this roster with three or more matches together anywhere — ordered by performance against what the rating gap predicted, not by record.

Mandy Earnest + Summer Copeland3245% games−7.7% vs expected
Jennifer Lunceford + Christine Kelly314 matchesnot enough data
Jennifer Lunceford + Mandy Earnest044 matchesnot enough data
Jennifer Lunceford + Summer Copeland134 matchesnot enough data
Christine Kelly + Summer Copeland033 matchesnot enough data
Mandy Earnest + Karyl Rhodes123 matchesnot enough data
Mandy Earnest + Stephanie Wills123 matchesnot enough data
Robin Morris + Stephanie Wills213 matchesnot enough data
Roster

Ordered by our estimated dynamic rating, which is why two players at the same published level are not tied — a published 4.0 says nothing about where inside the band someone sits. Lines played in this team’s season are shown beside each name.

3.5
Claire Modecki
31W–8L career · 5 lines in 2025
<1%64%36%
3.45
Robin Morris
38W–17L career · 3 lines in 2025
1%84%15%
3.35
3.5
Andrea Watkins
25W–17L career · 4 lines in 2025
2%91%7%
3.29
3.5
Christine Kelly
24W–21L career · 3 lines in 2025
6%92%2%
3.22
Karyl Rhodes
18W–19L career · 4 lines in 2025
7%91%2%
3.20
Stephanie Wills
55W–34L career · 6 lines in 2025
14%85%1%
3.15
Jennifer Lunceford
15W–22L career · 3 lines in 2025
45%55%<1%
3.02
Summer Copeland
19W–13L career · 1 line in 2025
<1%58%42%
2.97
Mandy Earnest
14W–25L career · 2 lines in 2025
1%88%11%
2.83
3
Denise Michaud
2W–12L career · 5 lines in 2025
not enough data
Wendy Sullivan
2W–4L career · 2 lines in 2025
not enough data

Three percentages are where each player stands right now: the chance they are below their band, inside it, or above it, on the way they are playing this season. The number on the right is our estimated dynamic rating, which USTA never publishes. This is today rather than a forecast of December, because a forecast has to assume future matches and cannot know whether someone will even be offered them. Percentages are blank where a player has too few matches this season, or at a level where the model does not yet beat a base-rate guess; the estimate is a weaker claim than a probability and survives where those do not.

Not affiliated with or endorsed by the USTA. Ratings labelled as published are USTA year-end figures; anything we describe as an estimate is ours, not USTA’s. Match data is from USTA TennisLink.