Teams

Daniel/JB/3Oaks

2024 Singles 18 & Over · 3.0 Women

6 players · average NTRP 3.00 / ARKANSAS

View scouting list →
Schedule8 played
2025-02-16vs Gill/JB/APLost 12
W#1 SinglesStephanie Romero vs Meghan Scott6-3, 1-6, 1-0
L#2 SinglesAli Parker vs Elizabeth Cox2-6, 3-6
L#3 SinglesSarah Newbern vs Maggie Barnes4-6, 7-6, 1-0
2024-12-08vs Gill/JB/APWon 21
L#1 SinglesLindi Wade vs Maggie Barnes6-7, 5-7
W#2 SinglesMorgan Davis-Daniel vs Paige Cox6-4, 6-1
W#3 SinglesStephanie Romero vs Rachael Rodery6-3, 6-1
2024-12-03vs Gifford/JB/JCCSplit 11
W#1 SinglesHannah Agudelo vs Kirby Smith6-3, 2-6, 1-0
L#3 SinglesStephanie Romero vs Mallory Hurst7-6, 5-7, 0-1
2024-11-25vs Parker/JB/APLost 03
L#1 SinglesStephanie Romero vs Abby Rogers2-6, 3-6
L#2 SinglesLindi Wade vs Haley Jones0-6, 6-7
L#3 SinglesAli Parker vs Crys Cook5-7, 2-6
2024-11-12vs Parker/JB/APLost 03
L#1 SinglesStephanie Romero vs Abby Rogers2-6, 0-6
L#2 SinglesHannah Agudelo vs Haley Jones6-3, 1-6, 0-1
L#3 SinglesSarah Newbern vs Autumn Eastep3-6, 5-7
2024-11-11vs Cobern/JB/3OaksWon 21
L#1 SinglesSarah Newbern vs Kamri Herndon3-6, 0-6
W#2 SinglesAli Parker vs Ella Bradsher6-1, 6-3
W#3 SinglesHannah Agudelo vs Karla Nortier6-1, 6-0
2024-11-07vs Cobern/JB/3OaksWon 21
W#1 SinglesStephanie Romero vs Tamara Lee6-4, 6-2
L#2 SinglesAli Parker vs Sarah Milton2-6, 4-6
W#3 SinglesMorgan Davis-Daniel vs Caroline Wilson6-1, 6-0
2024-11-04vs Gifford/JB/JCCLost 12
L#1 SinglesMorgan Davis-Daniel vs Alexandra Kosmitis6-7, 5-7
L#2 SinglesSarah Newbern vs Kirby Smith5-7, 2-6
W#3 SinglesLindi Wade vs Taylor Kaloghirou6-2, 6-3
A tie can be incomplete. Tell us if someone is missing.
i
Grouped by tie — one fixture, several lines. A line shows only when a player on it is someone we have indexed, so an early-season tie for a newly-added team can look short. This also means the line count here will not match the header, which counts individual player appearances.

Flight standings for 3.0 Women have not been collected yet. Where we have them we show every team in the flight ranked, with this team highlighted. The crawler is still filling in older seasons and flights.

ScoutingWhere each opponent usually plays

Signed-in extra: whether this captain plays strict strength order or mixes it up, from every doubles line they have put out. Create a free account to see it.

Roster averages 2.97 estimated across 5 rated players. No lineup is published in advance, so the column below is where each player has actually been used — a captain's habits are the best available forecast. Sign in and claim your record to see who you have played.

3.12
Stephanie Romero
usually #1 Singles 67%, also #3 Singles 33% · published
3.03
Lindi Wade
usually #2 Singles 33%, also #3 Singles 33% · published
2.97
Hannah Agudelo
usually #3 Singles 33%, also #1 Singles 33% · published
2.94
Morgan Davis-Daniel
usually #1 Singles 33%, also #3 Singles 33% · published
2.76
Sarah Newbern
usually #3 Singles 50%, also #1 Singles 25% · published
Ali Parker
usually #2 Singles 75%, also #3 Singles 25% · published 3
Established pairs

Doubles pairs from this roster with three or more matches together anywhere — ordered by performance against what the rating gap predicted, not by record.

Sarah Newbern + Hannah Agudelo2449% gamesnot enough data
Lindi Wade + Stephanie Romero303 matchesnot enough data
Roster

Ordered by our estimated dynamic rating, which is why two players at the same published level are not tied — a published 4.0 says nothing about where inside the band someone sits. Lines played in this team’s season are shown beside each name.

Stephanie Romero
21W–21L career · 6 lines in 2024
19%81%<1%
3.12
Lindi Wade
22W–14L career · 3 lines in 2024
42%58%<1%
3.03
Hannah Agudelo
17W–12L career · 3 lines in 2024
<1%58%42%
2.97
Morgan Davis-Daniel
20W–11L career · 3 lines in 2024
<1%65%35%
2.94
Sarah Newbern
6W–14L career · 4 lines in 2024
3%92%4%
2.76
3
Ali Parker
1W–4L career · 4 lines in 2024
not enough data

Three percentages are where each player stands right now: the chance they are below their band, inside it, or above it, on the way they are playing this season. The number on the right is our estimated dynamic rating, which USTA never publishes. This is today rather than a forecast of December, because a forecast has to assume future matches and cannot know whether someone will even be offered them. Percentages are blank where a player has too few matches this season, or at a level where the model does not yet beat a base-rate guess; the estimate is a weaker claim than a probability and survives where those do not.

Not affiliated with or endorsed by the USTA. Ratings labelled as published are USTA year-end figures; anything we describe as an estimate is ours, not USTA’s. Match data is from USTA TennisLink.