Teams

Capital City Club (Jenn Ingham)*

USTA Atlanta Summer - 40 & Over Business Women · 3.5 (Elena Cosper)

16 players · average NTRP 3.62 / GEORGIA

No matches recorded for this roster in this league — it may be a placeholder registration, or the season may not have started.

View scouting list →

Flight standings for 3.5 (Elena Cosper) have not been collected yet. Where we have them we show every team in the flight ranked, with this team highlighted. The crawler is still filling in older seasons and flights.

ScoutingWhere each opponent usually plays

Signed-in extra: whether this captain plays strict strength order or mixes it up, from every doubles line they have put out. Create a free account to see it.

Roster averages 3.29 estimated across 8 rated players. No lineup is published in advance, so the column below is where each player has actually been used — a captain's habits are the best available forecast. Sign in and claim your record to see who you have played.

3.68
Ashley Lehwald
published 4
3.61
Jenn Ingham
published
3.49
Catherine Pittman
published 3.5
3.24
Sloane Alford
published
3.24
Elizabeth Gray
published 4
3.21
Lauren Core
published
3.12
Robin Watson
published
2.70
Christina Pirouz
published 3
Cal Kanaly
published
Courtney McMillan
published
Jane Skinner
published
Kerry Fish
published
Lisa Stivers
published
Meghan Peters
published
Stacey Ollinger
published
Tammy Kushel
published
Established pairs

Doubles pairs from this roster with three or more matches together anywhere — ordered by performance against what the rating gap predicted, not by record.

Robin Watson + Lauren Core3349% gamesnot enough data
Courtney McMillan + Stacey Ollinger3253% gamesnot enough data
Sloane Alford + Courtney McMillan314 matchesnot enough data
Sloane Alford + Stacey Ollinger314 matchesnot enough data
Roster

Ordered by our estimated dynamic rating, which is why two players at the same published level are not tied — a published 4.0 says nothing about where inside the band someone sits. Lines played in this team’s season are shown beside each name.

4
Ashley Lehwald
34W–10L career · no lines in 2023
9%91%1%
3.68
Jenn Ingham
14W–11L career · no lines in 2023
20%80%<1%
3.61
3.5
Catherine Pittman
13W–17L career · no lines in 2023
<1%53%47%
3.49
Sloane Alford
17W–17L career · no lines in 2023
3%95%2%
3.24
4
Elizabeth Gray
46W–16L career · no lines in 2023
98%2%<1%
3.24
Lauren Core
30W–19L career · no lines in 2023
5%94%1%
3.21
Robin Watson
25W–31L career · no lines in 2023
18%81%<1%
3.12
3
Christina Pirouz
5W–18L career · no lines in 2023
6%93%1%
2.70
Cal Kanaly
2W–0L career · no lines in 2023
not enough data
Courtney McMillan
8W–8L career · no lines in 2023
not enough data
Jane Skinner
1W–12L career · no lines in 2023
not enough data
Kerry Fish
16W–14L career · no lines in 2023
not enough data
Lisa Stivers
16W–14L career · no lines in 2023
not enough data
Meghan Peters
2W–1L career · no lines in 2023
not enough data
Stacey Ollinger
15W–7L career · no lines in 2023
not enough data
Tammy Kushel
2W–8L career · no lines in 2023
not enough data

Three percentages are where each player stands right now: the chance they are below their band, inside it, or above it, on the way they are playing this season. The number on the right is our estimated dynamic rating, which USTA never publishes. This is today rather than a forecast of December, because a forecast has to assume future matches and cannot know whether someone will even be offered them. Percentages are blank where a player has too few matches this season, or at a level where the model does not yet beat a base-rate guess; the estimate is a weaker claim than a probability and survives where those do not.

Not affiliated with or endorsed by the USTA. Ratings labelled as published are USTA year-end figures; anything we describe as an estimate is ours, not USTA’s. Match data is from USTA TennisLink.