Teams

E. Frank

2022 SNM 65 & Over · 65 & Over Men 7.0

4 players · average NTRP 3.00 / SOUTHERN NEW MEXICO

No matches recorded for this roster in this league — it may be a placeholder registration, or the season may not have started.

View scouting list →
Schedule8 played
2022-10-27vs A. MichnoviczWon 20
W#1 DoublesMichael Burton / Ed Frank vs Susumu Yasuda / Carl Conley6-4, 4-6, 1-0
W#2 DoublesFrank Diamos / Albert Galves vs Gilbert Amezquita / Mark Peterson6-4, 1-6, 1-0
2022-10-22vs A. MichnoviczLost 01
L#1 DoublesFrank Diamos / Joseph Santackas vs Carl Conley / Andrew Michnovicz4-6, 2-6
2022-09-28vs A. MichnoviczLost 01
L#3 DoublesFrank Diamos / Jon Barbee vs Gilbert Amezquita / A C2-6, 0-6
2022-09-21vs A. MichnoviczWon 20
W#1 DoublesEd Frank / Michael Burton vs Andrew Michnovicz / Carl Conley6-7, 7-6, 1-0
W#2 DoublesJoseph Santackas / Frank Diamos vs Mark Peterson / Susumu Yasuda5-7, 6-4, 1-0
2022-09-10vs A. MichnoviczWon 10
W#2 DoublesJoseph Santackas / Frank Diamos vs Robert Czerniak / A C3-2
2022-09-03vs A. MichnoviczSplit 11
L#2 DoublesFrank Diamos / Joseph Santackas vs Robert Czerniak / A C6-4, 4-6, 0-1
W#3 DoublesJon Barbee / Ed Frank vs Andrew Michnovicz / Brian Park7-6, 6-2
2022-08-31vs A. MichnoviczLost 01
L#3 DoublesJames Bentley / Ed Frank vs Gilbert Amezquita / Mark Peterson1-6, 3-6
2022-08-27vs A. MichnoviczLost 02
L#1 DoublesEmery Borsodi / Joseph Santackas vs Carl Conley / Andrew Michnovicz2-6, 1-6
L#3 DoublesJames Bentley / Ed Frank vs Gilbert Amezquita / Mark Peterson2-6, 0-6
A tie can be incomplete. Tell us if someone is missing.
i
Grouped by tie — one fixture, several lines. A line shows only when a player on it is someone we have indexed, so an early-season tie for a newly-added team can look short. This also means the line count here will not match the header, which counts individual player appearances.
Flight standings2 teams · 65 & Over Men 7.0
TeamWLInd. WInd. LSets lostGames lost
1A. Michnovicz7219818192
2E. Frank2781942289

Ordered by team wins, then losses, then sets lost — the order USTA uses to seed a flight. Individual wins are lines, not ties.

See the full flight, with every team’s record

ScoutingWhere each opponent usually plays

Signed-in extra: whether this captain plays strict strength order or mixes it up, from every doubles line they have put out. Create a free account to see it.

No lineup is published in advance, so the column below is where each player has actually been used — a captain's habits are the best available forecast. Sign in and claim your record to see who you have played.

Ed Frank
usually #3 Doubles 60%, also #1 Doubles 40% · published 3
Frank Diamos
usually #2 Doubles 67%, also #3 Doubles 17% · published
Joseph Santackas
usually #2 Doubles 60%, also #1 Doubles 40% · published
Martin Porter
published
Established pairs

Doubles pairs from this roster with three or more matches together anywhere — ordered by performance against what the rating gap predicted, not by record.

Frank Diamos + Joseph Santackas224 matchesnot enough data
Frank Diamos + Ed Frank303 matchesnot enough data
Roster

Ordered by our estimated dynamic rating, which is why two players at the same published level are not tied — a published 4.0 says nothing about where inside the band someone sits. Lines played in this team’s season are shown beside each name.

3
Ed Frank
17W–22L career · 5 lines in 2022
not enough data
Frank Diamos
6W–5L career · 6 lines in 2022
not enough data
Joseph Santackas
18W–36L career · 5 lines in 2022
not enough data
Martin Porter
2W–3L career · no lines in 2022
not enough data

Three percentages are where each player stands right now: the chance they are below their band, inside it, or above it, on the way they are playing this season. The number on the right is our estimated dynamic rating, which USTA never publishes. This is today rather than a forecast of December, because a forecast has to assume future matches and cannot know whether someone will even be offered them. Percentages are blank where a player has too few matches this season, or at a level where the model does not yet beat a base-rate guess; the estimate is a weaker claim than a probability and survives where those do not.

Not affiliated with or endorsed by the USTA. Ratings labelled as published are USTA year-end figures; anything we describe as an estimate is ours, not USTA’s. Match data is from USTA TennisLink.