Teams

Kalispell Cannon Fodder

2022 Tri Level · Tri Level Men

5 players · average NTRP 4.10 / MONTANA

No matches recorded for this roster in this league — it may be a placeholder registration, or the season may not have started.

View scouting list →
Flight standings1 teams · Tri Level Men
TeamWLInd. WInd. LSets lostGames lost
1Kalispell Cannon Fodder000000

Ordered by team wins, then losses, then sets lost — the order USTA uses to seed a flight. Individual wins are lines, not ties.

See the full flight, with every team’s record

ScoutingWhere each opponent usually plays

Signed-in extra: whether this captain plays strict strength order or mixes it up, from every doubles line they have put out. Create a free account to see it.

Roster averages 3.74 estimated across 4 rated players. No lineup is published in advance, so the column below is where each player has actually been used — a captain's habits are the best available forecast. Sign in and claim your record to see who you have played.

4.12
Joshua Munro
published 4.5
4.01
Mark Odell
published 4.5
Cody Maynard
published 4
3.66
Brian Joos
published 4
3.19
James Shaffer
published 3.5
Established pairs

Doubles pairs from this roster with three or more matches together anywhere — ordered by performance against what the rating gap predicted, not by record.

Brian Joos + Joshua Munro5846% games−6.3% vs expected
Roster

Ordered by our estimated dynamic rating, which is why two players at the same published level are not tied — a published 4.0 says nothing about where inside the band someone sits. Lines played in this team’s season are shown beside each name.

4.5
Joshua Munro
52W–72L career · no lines in 2022
18%82%<1%
4.12
4.5
Mark Odell
13W–21L career · no lines in 2022
48%52%<1%
4.01
4
Cody Maynard
7W–16L career · no lines in 2022
not enough data
4
Brian Joos
21W–34L career · type S · no lines in 2022
11%88%<1%
3.66
3.5
James Shaffer
47W–56L career · no lines in 2022
8%92%1%
3.19

Three percentages are where each player stands right now: the chance they are below their band, inside it, or above it, on the way they are playing this season. The number on the right is our estimated dynamic rating, which USTA never publishes. This is today rather than a forecast of December, because a forecast has to assume future matches and cannot know whether someone will even be offered them. Percentages are blank where a player has too few matches this season, or at a level where the model does not yet beat a base-rate guess; the estimate is a weaker claim than a probability and survives where those do not.

Not affiliated with or endorsed by the USTA. Ratings labelled as published are USTA year-end figures; anything we describe as an estimate is ours, not USTA’s. Match data is from USTA TennisLink.