Teams

Winter Haven - J. Platania

2025 Polk Adult 55 & Over · 7.0 Women

12 players · average NTRP 3.38 / REGION_4

View scouting list →
Schedule8 played
2025-04-03vs Polk/Darch/55&Over7.0WLost 12
W#1 DoublesLeah Carrerou / Terree Meyers vs Margaret Huggins / Karen Bateman6-1, 6-4
L#2 DoublesJudi Whitaker / Sandy Ramsey vs Elizabeth Stevenson / Angela Johnson5-7, 1-6
L#3 DoublesJanet Platania / Marcia Whitney vs Cynthia Nettles / Kimberly Funk3-6, 1-6
2025-03-20vs Fun Bunch and Lunch - J. CollierLost 03
L#1 DoublesSonya Braudway / Janet Platania vs Ann Marie Toney / Bettye Sykes3-6, 1-6
L#2 DoublesMarcia Whitney / Maria Ramka vs Svetlana Darrow / Nancy Lamb6-7, 3-6
L#3 DoublesTerree Meyers / Kathy Borders vs Joanne Collier / Marilyn Clyne6-3, 2-6, 1-0
2025-03-13vs Polk/Darch/55&Over7.0WLost 12
W#1 DoublesSonya Braudway / Janet Platania vs Karen Bateman / Dang Williamson6-4, 6-4
L#2 DoublesElizabeth Merritt / Judi Whitaker vs Kimberly Funk / Elizabeth Stevenson3-6, 1-6
L#3 DoublesMandy Jarrett / Marcia Whitney vs Janese Dennis / Cynthia Nettles6-4, 3-6, 0-1
2025-02-27vs Fun Bunch and Lunch - J. CollierWon 21
L#1 DoublesLeah Carrerou / Maria Ramka vs Bettye Sykes / Ann Marie Toney7-5, 5-7, 0-1
W#2 DoublesElizabeth Merritt / Terree Meyers vs Joan Baldava / Linda Leber6-4, 0-6, 1-0
W#3 DoublesKathy Borders / Judi Whitaker vs Joanne Collier / Julie McBride7-5, 6-0
2025-02-20vs Polk/Darch/55&Over7.0WLost 12
L#1 DoublesTerree Meyers / Elizabeth Merritt vs Melissa Darch / Janese Dennis2-6, 4-6
L#2 DoublesSandy Ramsey / Maria Ramka vs Kimberly Funk / Elizabeth Stevenson3-6, 3-6
W#3 DoublesMarcia Whitney / Mandy Jarrett vs Karen Bateman / Kandy Wood6-3, 6-1
2025-02-06vs Fun Bunch and Lunch - J. CollierLost 12
W#1 DoublesLeah Carrerou / Terree Meyers vs Joanne Collier / Joan Baldava0-6, 7-5, 1-0
L#2 DoublesJanet Platania / Maria Ramka vs Marilyn Clyne / Linda Leber6-7, 6-3, 0-1
L#3 DoublesMarcia Whitney / Mandy Jarrett vs Ann Marie Toney / Hilda Franco3-6, 5-7
2025-01-30vs Polk/Darch/55&Over7.0WLost 12
L#1 DoublesSandy Ramsey / Maria Ramka vs Karola Cordero / Dang Williamson3-6, 6-3, 0-1
L#2 DoublesJanet Platania / Laura Motis vs Cynthia Nettles / Elizabeth Stevenson0-6, 2-6
W#3 DoublesTerree Meyers / Kathy Borders vs Angela Johnson / Karen Hogg6-3, 7-6
2025-01-16vs Fun Bunch and Lunch - J. CollierLost 03
L#1 DoublesMaria Ramka / Laura Motis vs Ginger Davis / Lizbeth Engle4-6, 0-6
L#2 DoublesMarcia Whitney / Judi Whitaker vs Marilyn Clyne / Julie McBride1-6, 1-6
L#3 DoublesLeah Carrerou / Elizabeth Merritt vs Bettye Sykes / Ann Marie Toney6-2, 2-6, 0-1
A tie can be incomplete. Tell us if someone is missing.
i
Grouped by tie — one fixture, several lines. A line shows only when a player on it is someone we have indexed, so an early-season tie for a newly-added team can look short. This also means the line count here will not match the header, which counts individual player appearances.

Flight standings for 7.0 Women have not been collected yet. Where we have them we show every team in the flight ranked, with this team highlighted. The crawler is still filling in older seasons and flights.

ScoutingWhere each opponent usually plays

Signed-in extra: whether this captain plays strict strength order or mixes it up, from every doubles line they have put out. Create a free account to see it.

Roster averages 3.13 estimated across 11 rated players. No lineup is published in advance, so the column below is where each player has actually been used — a captain's habits are the best available forecast. Sign in and claim your record to see who you have played.

3.40
Kathy Borders
usually #3 Doubles 100% · published 3.5
3.33
Sonya Braudway
published
3.22
Marcia Whitney
usually #3 Doubles 67%, also #2 Doubles 33% · published 3.5
3.18
Elizabeth Merritt
published 3.5
3.17
Sandy Ramsey
published
3.12
Maria Ramka
usually #1 Doubles 50%, also #2 Doubles 50% · published
3.10
Leah Carrerou
usually #1 Doubles 75%, also #3 Doubles 25% · published
3.08
Janet Platania
usually #2 Doubles 40%, also #1 Doubles 40% · published
3.00
Mandy Jarrett
usually #3 Doubles 100% · published 3
2.96
Laura Motis
published
2.91
Terree Meyers
usually #1 Doubles 50%, also #3 Doubles 33% · published
Judi Whitaker
usually #2 Doubles 75%, also #3 Doubles 25% · published
Established pairs

Doubles pairs from this roster with three or more matches together anywhere — ordered by performance against what the rating gap predicted, not by record.

Marcia Whitney + Mandy Jarrett7554% games+5.8% vs expected
Janet Platania + Judi Whitaker2442% games−6.2% vs expected
Leah Carrerou + Terree Meyers182345% games−6.9% vs expected
Janet Platania + Marcia Whitney2540% games−8.1% vs expected
Marcia Whitney + Judi Whitaker3543% gamesnot enough data
Leah Carrerou + Kathy Borders3445% gamesnot enough data
Terree Meyers + Kathy Borders3351% gamesnot enough data
Judi Whitaker + Mandy Jarrett3262% gamesnot enough data
Roster

Ordered by our estimated dynamic rating, which is why two players at the same published level are not tied — a published 4.0 says nothing about where inside the band someone sits. Lines played in this team’s season are shown beside each name.

3.5
Kathy Borders
109W–75L career · 3 lines in 2025
<1%77%23%
3.40
Sonya Braudway
10W–7L career · no lines in 2025
<1%89%10%
3.33
3.5
Marcia Whitney
61W–80L career · 6 lines in 2025
4%94%2%
3.22
3.5
Elizabeth Merritt
2W–13L career · no lines in 2025
8%91%1%
3.18
Sandy Ramsey
9W–13L career · no lines in 2025
10%89%1%
3.17
Maria Ramka
86W–74L career · 6 lines in 2025
18%82%<1%
3.12
Leah Carrerou
87W–95L career · 4 lines in 2025
22%78%<1%
3.10
Janet Platania
55W–81L career · 5 lines in 2025
27%73%<1%
3.08
3
Mandy Jarrett
73W–46L career · 3 lines in 2025
<1%51%49%
3.00
Laura Motis
10W–13L career · no lines in 2025
61%39%<1%
2.96
Terree Meyers
53W–86L career · 6 lines in 2025
75%25%<1%
2.91
Judi Whitaker
52W–62L career · 4 lines in 2025
not enough data

Three percentages are where each player stands right now: the chance they are below their band, inside it, or above it, on the way they are playing this season. The number on the right is our estimated dynamic rating, which USTA never publishes. This is today rather than a forecast of December, because a forecast has to assume future matches and cannot know whether someone will even be offered them. Percentages are blank where a player has too few matches this season, or at a level where the model does not yet beat a base-rate guess; the estimate is a weaker claim than a probability and survives where those do not.

Not affiliated with or endorsed by the USTA. Ratings labelled as published are USTA year-end figures; anything we describe as an estimate is ours, not USTA’s. Match data is from USTA TennisLink.