Teams

Anderson -TRC

2026 NETX Adult 18 & Over · 3.0 Men

6 players · average NTRP 2.75 / TEXAS

No matches recorded for this roster in this league — it may be a placeholder registration, or the season may not have started.

View scouting list →
Schedule6 played
2026-06-09vs Woelkers/Tai-HTWon 20
W#1 DoublesDavid Socia / Tyson Shackelford vs Joseph Woelkers / Gerrit Viljoen6-3, 6-2
W#1 SinglesMoises Sidransky vs Sean Ray6-1, 6-3
2026-06-08vs Woelkers/Tai-HTWon 21
W#1 SinglesMathis Fender vs William Norton6-2, 6-3
L#2 DoublesDavid Socia / Tyson Shackelford vs Justin Lindley / Gerrit Viljoen6-2, 2-6, 0-1
W#3 DoublesAlan Anderson / Steve Walsh vs Joseph Woelkers / Kenny Cotten6-2, 6-1
2026-05-18vs Woelkers/Tai-HTWon 31
W#1 DoublesKelly Johnston / Moises Sidransky vs Billy Anderson / Matthew Schulz6-1, 6-0
L#1 SinglesAlan Anderson vs William Norton3-6, 4-6
W#2 SinglesClay Hamil vs Shawn Dunn6-2, 6-4
W#3 DoublesSteve Walsh / Brett Leavitt vs Justin Lindley / Joseph Woelkers6-3, 6-4
2026-05-11vs Woelkers/Tai-HTWon 20
W#1 DoublesAlan Anderson / Moises Sidransky vs Justin Lindley / Billy Anderson6-2, 7-5
W#1 SinglesMathis Fender vs William Norton6-4, 4-6, 1-0
2026-05-04vs Woelkers/Tai-HTWon 31
W#1 DoublesAlan Anderson / Brad Ledbetter vs Mark Peaden / Sean Ray6-4, 7-5
L#1 SinglesClay Hamil vs William Norton2-6, 1-6
W#2 DoublesKelly Johnston / Brett Leavitt vs Joseph Woelkers / Billy Anderson6-1, 6-2
W#2 SinglesMathis Fender vs Shawn Dunn6-1, 6-1
2026-04-20vs Woelkers/Tai-HTWon 40
W#1 DoublesBrad Ledbetter / Brett Leavitt vs Billy Anderson / Matthew Schulz6-3, 7-5
W#2 DoublesMathis Fender / Eric Helgesen vs Sean Ray / Mark Peaden6-0, 7-6
W#2 SinglesClay Hamil vs Shawn Dunn6-3, 6-3
W#3 DoublesDavid Socia / Tyson Shackelford vs Joseph Woelkers / Gerrit Viljoen6-2, 6-3
A tie can be incomplete. Tell us if someone is missing.
i
Grouped by tie — one fixture, several lines. A line shows only when a player on it is someone we have indexed, so an early-season tie for a newly-added team can look short. This also means the line count here will not match the header, which counts individual player appearances.
Flight standings2 teams · 3.0 Men
TeamWLInd. WInd. LSets lostGames lost
1Anderson -TRC6025512168
2Woelkers/Tai-HT0652552336

Ordered by team wins, then losses, then sets lost — the order USTA uses to seed a flight. Individual wins are lines, not ties.

See the full flight, with every team’s record

ScoutingWhere each opponent usually plays

Signed-in extra: whether this captain plays strict strength order or mixes it up, from every doubles line they have put out. Create a free account to see it.

Roster averages 2.72 estimated across 6 rated players. No lineup is published in advance, so the column below is where each player has actually been used — a captain's habits are the best available forecast. Sign in and claim your record to see who you have played.

2.98
Mathis Fender
usually #1 Singles 50%, also #2 Singles 25% · published
2.92
Clay Hamil
usually #2 Singles 67%, also #1 Singles 33% · published 3
2.91
Moises Sidransky
usually #1 Doubles 67%, also #1 Singles 33% · published
2.74
Alan Anderson
usually #1 Doubles 50%, also #1 Singles 25% · published 3
2.45
David Socia
usually #1 Doubles 33%, also #3 Doubles 33% · published 2.5
2.33
Brett Leavitt
usually #3 Doubles 33%, also #2 Doubles 33% · published 2.5
Roster

Ordered by our estimated dynamic rating, which is why two players at the same published level are not tied — a published 4.0 says nothing about where inside the band someone sits. Lines played in this team’s season are shown beside each name.

Mathis Fender
14W–2L career · 4 lines in 2026
<1%56%44%
2.98
3
Clay Hamil
12W–7L career · type S · 3 lines in 2026
<1%74%26%
2.92
Moises Sidransky
5W–2L career · 3 lines in 2026
<1%75%25%
2.91
3
Alan Anderson
8W–8L career · type S · 4 lines in 2026
3%95%2%
2.74
2.5
David Socia
9W–5L career · type S · 3 lines in 2026
0%65%35%
2.45
2.5
Brett Leavitt
5W–1L career · type S · 3 lines in 2026
0%91%9%
2.33

Three percentages are where each player stands right now: the chance they are below their band, inside it, or above it, on the way they are playing this season. The number on the right is our estimated dynamic rating, which USTA never publishes. This is today rather than a forecast of December, because a forecast has to assume future matches and cannot know whether someone will even be offered them. Percentages are blank where a player has too few matches this season, or at a level where the model does not yet beat a base-rate guess; the estimate is a weaker claim than a probability and survives where those do not.

Not affiliated with or endorsed by the USTA. Ratings labelled as published are USTA year-end figures; anything we describe as an estimate is ours, not USTA’s. Match data is from USTA TennisLink.