Teams

BM BLUE

2021 USTA ADULT 18 & OVER - DEN · WOMEN 2.5 - 18 & OVER

9 players · average NTRP 2.62 / COLORADO

No matches recorded for this roster in this league — it may be a placeholder registration, or the season may not have started.

View scouting list →
Schedule7 played
2021-06-02vs LEBTC SILVERLost 01
L#2 DoublesKristiane Lucas / Natallia Temnikova Avseev vs Kristine Johnson / Ann Adams6-4, 2-6, 0-1
2021-05-26vs KC REDLost 01
L#2 DoublesKristiane Lucas / Elizabeth Riggs vs Annie Packard / Katie Colley2-6, 0-6
2021-05-19vs CCC BLUELost 01
L#2 DoublesElizabeth Riggs / Kristiane Lucas vs Jessica Vukovich / Kelli Lasher1-6, 3-6
2021-05-12vs LEBTC GREENWon 10
W#2 DoublesKristiane Lucas / Andrea Linneman vs Ashleigh Havekost / Maureen Boyd7-5, 6-2
2021-05-05vs KC YELLOWLost 01
L#1 DoublesKristiane Lucas / Andrea Linneman vs Erica Smith / Judy Delzell2-6, 2-6
2021-04-28vs SSLGT GREENWon 10
W#2 DoublesKristiane Lucas / Elizabeth Riggs vs Sherri Griffin / Zhanna Jackson6-1, 6-3
2021-04-23vs BCST REDWon 10
W#2 DoublesKristiane Lucas / Elizabeth Riggs vs Stephanie Passarelli / JILL KROOG6-2, 6-0
A tie can be incomplete. Tell us if someone is missing.
i
Grouped by tie — one fixture, several lines. A line shows only when a player on it is someone we have indexed, so an early-season tie for a newly-added team can look short. This also means the line count here will not match the header, which counts individual player appearances.

Flight standings for WOMEN 2.5 - 18 & OVER have not been collected yet. Where we have them we show every team in the flight ranked, with this team highlighted. The crawler is still filling in older seasons and flights.

ScoutingWhere each opponent usually plays

Signed-in extra: whether this captain plays strict strength order or mixes it up, from every doubles line they have put out. Create a free account to see it.

Roster averages 2.38 estimated across 6 rated players. No lineup is published in advance, so the column below is where each player has actually been used — a captain's habits are the best available forecast. Sign in and claim your record to see who you have played.

2.94
Theresa Fry
published
Debbie Krenz
published 3
2.63
2.46
Laura Yetzer
published
2.27
Kristiane Lucas
usually #2 Doubles 86%, also #1 Doubles 14% · published 2.5
Andrea Linneman
published 2.5
Elizabeth Riggs
published 2.5
2.02
Melinda Lockhart
published
1.94
Susan Berndt
published
Established pairs

Doubles pairs from this roster with three or more matches together anywhere — ordered by performance against what the rating gap predicted, not by record.

Melinda Lockhart + Kristiane Lucas2446% games−2.2% vs expected
Laura Yetzer + Theresa Fry3649% games−4.9% vs expected
Elizabeth Riggs + Kristiane Lucas6746% games−5.2% vs expected
Andrea Linneman + Kristiane Lucas134 matchesnot enough data
Debbie Krenz + Theresa Fry314 matchesnot enough data
Susan Berndt + Melinda Lockhart033 matchesnot enough data
Roster

Ordered by our estimated dynamic rating, which is why two players at the same published level are not tied — a published 4.0 says nothing about where inside the band someone sits. Lines played in this team’s season are shown beside each name.

Theresa Fry
49W–28L career · no lines in 2021
<1%67%33%
2.94
3
Debbie Krenz
26W–9L career · no lines in 2021
not enough data
Natallia Temnikova Avseev
10W–9L career · no lines in 2021
16%84%<1%
2.63
Laura Yetzer
25W–32L career · no lines in 2021
61%39%<1%
2.46
2.5
Kristiane Lucas
22W–64L career · 7 lines in 2021
0%96%4%
2.27
2.5
Andrea Linneman
5W–15L career · no lines in 2021
not enough data
2.5
Elizabeth Riggs
19W–25L career · no lines in 2021
not enough data
Melinda Lockhart
15W–38L career · no lines in 2021
0%>99%<1%
2.02
Susan Berndt
10W–58L career · no lines in 2021
0%>99%<1%
1.94

Three percentages are where each player stands right now: the chance they are below their band, inside it, or above it, on the way they are playing this season. The number on the right is our estimated dynamic rating, which USTA never publishes. This is today rather than a forecast of December, because a forecast has to assume future matches and cannot know whether someone will even be offered them. Percentages are blank where a player has too few matches this season, or at a level where the model does not yet beat a base-rate guess; the estimate is a weaker claim than a probability and survives where those do not.

Not affiliated with or endorsed by the USTA. Ratings labelled as published are USTA year-end figures; anything we describe as an estimate is ours, not USTA’s. Match data is from USTA TennisLink.