Teams

GFU-Razon-Lumetta

2021 Adult 55 & Over · 7.0 Women

3 players · average NTRP 3.5 · USTA/PACIFIC NW / NORTHERN OREGON

View scouting list →
Scouting

Roster averages 3.23 estimated across 2 rated players. No lineup is published in advance, so the column below is where each player has actually been used — a captain's habits are the best available forecast. Sign in and claim your record to see who you have played.

3.32
Tami Socolofsky
usually #2 Doubles 67%, also #3 Doubles 33% · published 3.5
Linda Mertz
usually #3 Doubles 75%, also #1 Doubles 25% · published 3.5
3.13
Kim Christensen
published 3.5
Results5 ties
2020-11-15Won 10
W#3 DoublesKathy Schaub / Linda Mertz vs Gretchen Wagner / Rico McIver6-4, 2-6, 1-0
2020-11-08Lost 01
L#2 DoublesChristine Keefer / Tami Socolofsky vs Nozomi Bray / Gretchen Newcomb7-6, 6-4
2020-10-25Split 11
L#2 DoublesTami Socolofsky / Kathy Schaub vs Julia Rea / Christina Gibson6-3, 4-6, 1-0
W#3 DoublesShella Razon-Lumetta / Linda Mertz vs Barbara Hart / Michele Beaman6-4, 1-6, 1-0
2020-10-10Lost 02
L#1 DoublesChristine Keefer / Linda Mertz vs Rico McIver / Susie Jansky6-2, 6-3
L#3 DoublesKathy Schaub / Tami Socolofsky vs Laura Laney / Peg McClendon6-4, 6-2
2020-10-04Won 10
W#3 DoublesJacqui Slominski / Linda Mertz vs Jeny Joseph / Ellen Hodges6-4, 6-4
A tie can be incomplete. Tell us if someone is missing.
i
Grouped by tie — one fixture, several lines. A line shows only when a player on it is someone we have indexed, so an early-season tie for a newly-added team can look short. This also means the line count here will not match the header, which counts individual player appearances.
Roster

Ordered by our estimated dynamic rating, which is why two players at the same published level are not tied — a published 4.0 says nothing about where inside the band someone sits.

3.5
Tami Socolofsky
31W–36L career
2%92%6%
3.32
3.5
Linda Mertz
19W–20L career
not enough data
3.5
Kim Christensen
41W–43L career
17%82%1%
3.13

Three percentages are the year-end projection — chance of moving down, staying, moving up — and the number on the right is our estimated dynamic rating, which USTA never publishes. Percentages are blank where a player has too few matches this season, or at a level where the model does not yet beat a base-rate guess; the estimate is a weaker claim than a probability and survives where those do not.