Teams

Sarasota/Amero/40&Over4.5M

2025 Sarasota Adult 40 & Over Spring Weekday · 4.5 M Sunday

16 players · average NTRP 4.50 / REGION_5

View scouting list →
Schedule4 played
2025-06-08Won 10
W#4 DoublesPatrick Nguyen / Charles Gauthier vs N/A6-0, 6-0
2025-06-01vs SSC DenyesWon 10
W#2 DoublesKevin Spudic / Jamie Mckibban vs Don Boyle / Steven Paley6-2, 6-1
2025-05-18vs SSC DenyesWon 10
W#1 DoublesCharles Gauthier / Manuel Alvarez vs Dean Dancer / Dan McClure6-2, 3-6, 1-0
2025-04-27vs SSC DenyesWon 10
W#1 SinglesJamie Mckibban vs Dan McClure6-2, 6-2
A tie can be incomplete. Tell us if someone is missing.
i
Grouped by tie — one fixture, several lines. A line shows only when a player on it is someone we have indexed, so an early-season tie for a newly-added team can look short. This also means the line count here will not match the header, which counts individual player appearances.

Flight standings for 4.5 M Sunday have not been collected yet. Where we have them we show every team in the flight ranked, with this team highlighted. The crawler is still filling in older seasons and flights.

ScoutingWhere each opponent usually plays

Signed-in extra: whether this captain plays strict strength order or mixes it up, from every doubles line they have put out. Create a free account to see it.

Roster averages 4.27 estimated across 8 rated players. No lineup is published in advance, so the column below is where each player has actually been used — a captain's habits are the best available forecast. Sign in and claim your record to see who you have played.

4.41
Chris Canfield
published 4.5
4.40
Jamie Mckibban
usually #1 Singles 50%, also #2 Doubles 50% · published 4.5
4.39
Manuel Alvarez
published
4.37
Charles Gauthier
usually #1 Doubles 50%, also #4 Doubles 50% · published 4.5
4.30
Matthew Schnell
published
Bojan Vuckovic
published 4.5
4.17
Ignacio Molina
published
4.05
Alan Amero
published 4.5
4.05
Andre Herke
published 4.5
Kevin Spudic
published
Patrick Nguyen
published
Phillip Mihm
published
Randy Nistler
published
Scott Schuhriemen
published
Steve Heitzner
published
Thiago Domingues
published
Established pairs

Doubles pairs from this roster with three or more matches together anywhere — ordered by performance against what the rating gap predicted, not by record.

Charles Gauthier + Manuel Alvarez11168% games+12.9% vs expected
Andre Herke + Alan Amero1434% gamesnot enough data
Roster

Ordered by our estimated dynamic rating, which is why two players at the same published level are not tied — a published 4.0 says nothing about where inside the band someone sits. Lines played in this team’s season are shown beside each name.

4.5
Chris Canfield
13W–3L career · no lines in 2025
<1%75%25%
4.41
4.5
Jamie Mckibban
109W–29L career · 2 lines in 2025
<1%77%23%
4.40
Manuel Alvarez
22W–2L career · no lines in 2025
<1%78%22%
4.39
4.5
Charles Gauthier
34W–15L career · 2 lines in 2025
<1%82%17%
4.37
Matthew Schnell
2W–5L career · no lines in 2025
no projection at this level
4.30
4.5
Bojan Vuckovic
2W–0L career · no lines in 2025
not enough data
Ignacio Molina
16W–4L career · no lines in 2025
12%87%1%
4.17
4.5
Alan Amero
2W–5L career · no lines in 2025
37%63%<1%
4.05
4.5
Andre Herke
2W–5L career · no lines in 2025
37%63%<1%
4.05
Kevin Spudic
2W–1L career · no lines in 2025
not enough data
Patrick Nguyen
47W–23L career · no lines in 2025
not enough data
Phillip Mihm
12W–0L career · no lines in 2025
not enough data
Randy Nistler
3W–1L career · no lines in 2025
not enough data
Scott Schuhriemen
2W–0L career · no lines in 2025
not enough data
Steve Heitzner
2W–2L career · no lines in 2025
not enough data
Thiago Domingues
10W–4L career · no lines in 2025
not enough data

Three percentages are where each player stands right now: the chance they are below their band, inside it, or above it, on the way they are playing this season. The number on the right is our estimated dynamic rating, which USTA never publishes. This is today rather than a forecast of December, because a forecast has to assume future matches and cannot know whether someone will even be offered them. Percentages are blank where a player has too few matches this season, or at a level where the model does not yet beat a base-rate guess; the estimate is a weaker claim than a probability and survives where those do not.

Not affiliated with or endorsed by the USTA. Ratings labelled as published are USTA year-end figures; anything we describe as an estimate is ours, not USTA’s. Match data is from USTA TennisLink.