Teams

HOA-REG-Mekles

18 & Over .5's Aug. 18-20 · 4.5 Men

15 players · average NTRP 4.75 / OKLAHOMA

No matches recorded for this roster in this league — it may be a placeholder registration, or the season may not have started.

View scouting list →
Flight standings7 teams · 4.5 Men
TeamWLInd. WInd. LSets lostGames lost
1NE-REG-Betts000000
2HOA-REG-Mekles000000
3IA-REG-Boyer000000
4KS-REG-Whitmer/Jones/18&Over4.5M000000
5OK-Reg-Ramsey/Tims000000
6STL-REG-Hamilton/18&Over4.5M000000
7OKWC-REG-Smith000000

Ordered by team wins, then losses, then sets lost — the order USTA uses to seed a flight. Individual wins are lines, not ties.

See the full flight, with every team’s record

ScoutingWhere each opponent usually plays

Signed-in extra: whether this captain plays strict strength order or mixes it up, from every doubles line they have put out. Create a free account to see it.

Roster averages 4.24 estimated across 9 rated players. No lineup is published in advance, so the column below is where each player has actually been used — a captain's habits are the best available forecast. Sign in and claim your record to see who you have played.

4.42
Nino Portugal
published
4.36
Adam Schere
published 5
4.34
Scott Martin
published
4.31
Alex Qin
published 5
Eric Globerman
published 4.5
John Henderson
published 4.5
4.20
Joel Ackerman
published
4.18
Mason Thieu
published
4.17
Todd Rilinger
published
4.14
Rick Walsh
published
4.07
Joshua Douglass
published
Jonathan Baillie
published
Kristopher Snyder
published
Martin Maguire
published
Todd Mekles
published
Established pairs

Doubles pairs from this roster with three or more matches together anywhere — ordered by performance against what the rating gap predicted, not by record.

Joel Ackerman + Scott Martin7064% games+6.3% vs expected
Adam Schere + Joshua Douglass10852% games+4.9% vs expected
Todd Rilinger + Alex Qin5068% games+3.8% vs expected
Adam Schere + Alex Qin4740% games−6.2% vs expected
Scott Martin + Joshua Douglass134 matchesnot enough data
Roster

Ordered by our estimated dynamic rating, which is why two players at the same published level are not tied — a published 4.0 says nothing about where inside the band someone sits. Lines played in this team’s season are shown beside each name.

Nino Portugal
13W–7L career · no lines in 2023
<1%73%27%
4.42
5
Adam Schere
82W–61L career · no lines in 2023
87%13%<1%
4.36
Scott Martin
44W–29L career · no lines in 2023
<1%88%12%
4.34
5
Alex Qin
28W–23L career · no lines in 2023
93%7%<1%
4.31
4.5
Eric Globerman
14W–15L career · no lines in 2023
not enough data
4.5
John Henderson
12W–8L career · no lines in 2023
not enough data
Joel Ackerman
48W–18L career · no lines in 2023
6%93%1%
4.20
Mason Thieu
9W–18L career · no lines in 2023
99%1%<1%
4.18
Todd Rilinger
27W–21L career · no lines in 2023
10%90%1%
4.17
Rick Walsh
44W–28L career · no lines in 2023
14%85%<1%
4.14
Joshua Douglass
46W–46L career · no lines in 2023
30%70%<1%
4.07
Jonathan Baillie
26W–6L career · no lines in 2023
not enough data
Kristopher Snyder
27W–32L career · no lines in 2023
not enough data
Martin Maguire
3W–3L career · no lines in 2023
not enough data
Todd Mekles
54W–38L career · no lines in 2023
not enough data

Three percentages are where each player stands right now: the chance they are below their band, inside it, or above it, on the way they are playing this season. The number on the right is our estimated dynamic rating, which USTA never publishes. This is today rather than a forecast of December, because a forecast has to assume future matches and cannot know whether someone will even be offered them. Percentages are blank where a player has too few matches this season, or at a level where the model does not yet beat a base-rate guess; the estimate is a weaker claim than a probability and survives where those do not.

Not affiliated with or endorsed by the USTA. Ratings labelled as published are USTA year-end figures; anything we describe as an estimate is ours, not USTA’s. Match data is from USTA TennisLink.