Teams

HCC - M. Sheridan

2022 Hillsborough Adult 18 & Over · 4.0 Adult 18 & Over Day - Women

10 players · average NTRP 4.10 / REGION_3

View scouting list →
Schedule7 played
2022-03-11Lost 01
L#1 DoublesLaurie Smith / Xiao Zhang vs Pat Ashby / Sharon Lore1-6, 3-3
2022-03-04Won 10
W#2 DoublesRhonda Mendoza / Holly Charles vs Natalie Martinez / Diane Jackson6-2, 6-3
2022-02-25vs HCC Causing A Racquet - A. FlinterSplit 11
L#1 DoublesElizabeth Burdick / Jennifer Bell vs Angie Jones / Jamie Hamilton3-6, 2-6
W#2 DoublesHolly Charles / Laurie Smith vs Anh Flinter / Prin Vasseur6-4, 6-3
W#1 DoublesElizabeth Burdick / Rhonda Mendoza vs Leticia Leppert / Brenda Kunkel6-2, 6-7, 1-0
W#3 DoublesLaurie Smith / Xiao Zhang vs Shariffa Spicer / Silvia Srour6-4, 6-1
W#1 DoublesRhonda Mendoza / Jennifer Bell vs Lindsey Robbins / Michelle Wolfe6-4, 6-2
W#2 DoublesLaurie Smith / Xiao Zhang vs Tania Biller / Carolyn Murnane6-4, 6-2
2022-02-04vs Buckhorn - E. BuffingtonSplit 11
W#1 DoublesLaurie Smith / Holly Charles vs Elisa Buffington / Michelle Bonilla6-3, 6-1
L#2 DoublesRhonda Mendoza / Lisa Coyne vs Brigitte Paola / Daphne Mahagan5-7, 7-6, 1-0
2022-01-21vs Harbour Island - S. WilsonWon 20
W#1 DoublesLaurie Smith / Xiao Zhang vs Julia van Diver / Stacey Koval6-2, 6-3
W#2 DoublesRhonda Mendoza / Elizabeth Burdick vs Lori Soberman / Christel Yaffe6-1, 6-4
A tie can be incomplete. Tell us if someone is missing.
i
Grouped by tie — one fixture, several lines. A line shows only when a player on it is someone we have indexed, so an early-season tie for a newly-added team can look short. This also means the line count here will not match the header, which counts individual player appearances.

Flight standings for 4.0 Adult 18 & Over Day - Women have not been collected yet. Where we have them we show every team in the flight ranked, with this team highlighted. The crawler is still filling in older seasons and flights.

ScoutingWhere each opponent usually plays

Signed-in extra: whether this captain plays strict strength order or mixes it up, from every doubles line they have put out. Create a free account to see it.

Roster averages 3.78 estimated across 7 rated players. No lineup is published in advance, so the column below is where each player has actually been used — a captain's habits are the best available forecast. Sign in and claim your record to see who you have played.

Alice Hagan
published 4.5
3.96
Patty Halstead
published
3.87
Rhonda Mendoza
usually #2 Doubles 60%, also #1 Doubles 40% · published 4
3.77
Amy Warren
published 4
3.76
Elizabeth Burdick
usually #1 Doubles 67%, also #2 Doubles 33% · published 4
3.75
Monica Sanchez
published
Holly Charles
published 4
3.72
Melissa Sheridan
published
3.62
Laurie Smith
usually #1 Doubles 50%, also #2 Doubles 33% · published
Xiao Zhang
published
Established pairs

Doubles pairs from this roster with three or more matches together anywhere — ordered by performance against what the rating gap predicted, not by record.

Melissa Sheridan + Patty Halstead7263% games+5.0% vs expected
Rhonda Mendoza + Elizabeth Burdick19755% games−1.0% vs expected
Laurie Smith + Rhonda Mendoza213 matchesnot enough data
Roster

Ordered by our estimated dynamic rating, which is why two players at the same published level are not tied — a published 4.0 says nothing about where inside the band someone sits. Lines played in this team’s season are shown beside each name.

4.5
Alice Hagan
0W–1L career · no lines in 2022
not enough data
Patty Halstead
15W–5L career · no lines in 2022
<1%61%39%
3.96
4
Rhonda Mendoza
162W–81L career · 5 lines in 2022
<1%84%16%
3.87
4
Amy Warren
3W–1L career · no lines in 2022
2%94%4%
3.77
4
Elizabeth Burdick
222W–79L career · 3 lines in 2022
2%94%3%
3.76
Monica Sanchez
24W–24L career · no lines in 2022
3%95%3%
3.75
4
Holly Charles
0W–2L career · no lines in 2022
not enough data
Melissa Sheridan
24W–8L career · no lines in 2022
5%94%1%
3.72
Laurie Smith
232W–110L career · 6 lines in 2022
18%82%<1%
3.62
Xiao Zhang
1W–0L career · no lines in 2022
not enough data

Three percentages are where each player stands right now: the chance they are below their band, inside it, or above it, on the way they are playing this season. The number on the right is our estimated dynamic rating, which USTA never publishes. This is today rather than a forecast of December, because a forecast has to assume future matches and cannot know whether someone will even be offered them. Percentages are blank where a player has too few matches this season, or at a level where the model does not yet beat a base-rate guess; the estimate is a weaker claim than a probability and survives where those do not.

Not affiliated with or endorsed by the USTA. Ratings labelled as published are USTA year-end figures; anything we describe as an estimate is ours, not USTA’s. Match data is from USTA TennisLink.