Teams

1-KLahey-CHTC-55+ 8.0

2022 Eno River Mixed 55 & Over · 55 & Over Adult Mixed 8.0 Evening

11 players · average NTRP 3.92 / NORTH CAROLINA

View scouting list →
Schedule6 played
2022-08-10Lost 01
L#3 DoublesBoyd Blackburn / Andy Blackburn vs Mary Parker / Lindsay Benton2-6, 1-6
2022-07-31vs 3-MScurtu-HSLost 01
L#3 DoublesBoyd Blackburn / Andy Blackburn vs Nannette Goodwin / Philip Sweigart1-6, 3-6
2022-07-14vs 2-CJones-EnoLost 01
L#2 DoublesGary Glish / Kristin Lahey vs Robert Taylor / Sheryletta Lacewell4-6, 3-6
2022-06-23Won 10
W#3 DoublesBoyd Blackburn / Andy Blackburn vs N/A6-0, 6-0
2022-06-21vs 3-MScurtu-HSWon 10
W#2 DoublesBoyd Blackburn / Andy Blackburn vs Lindsay Benton / Donna Newell6-2, 6-2
2022-05-26vs 2-CJones-EnoLost 02
L#2 DoublesGary Glish / Kristin Lahey vs Kenneth Kornegay / Cynthia Jones3-6, 6-4, 0-1
L#3 DoublesBoyd Blackburn / Andy Blackburn vs Robert Taylor / Sheryletta Lacewell4-6, 3-6
A tie can be incomplete. Tell us if someone is missing.
i
Grouped by tie — one fixture, several lines. A line shows only when a player on it is someone we have indexed, so an early-season tie for a newly-added team can look short. This also means the line count here will not match the header, which counts individual player appearances.

Flight standings for 55 & Over Adult Mixed 8.0 Evening have not been collected yet. Where we have them we show every team in the flight ranked, with this team highlighted. The crawler is still filling in older seasons and flights.

ScoutingWhere each opponent usually plays

Signed-in extra: whether this captain plays strict strength order or mixes it up, from every doubles line they have put out. Create a free account to see it.

Roster averages 3.55 estimated across 9 rated players. No lineup is published in advance, so the column below is where each player has actually been used — a captain's habits are the best available forecast. Sign in and claim your record to see who you have played.

4.05
Boyd Blackburn
usually #3 Doubles 80%, also #2 Doubles 20% · published 4.5
3.86
Kristin Lahey
usually #2 Doubles 100% · published 4
3.77
BRYAN WRIGHT
published 4
3.50
Diane Birkemo
published 4
3.47
Jeanne Beckley
published
3.44
Andy Blackburn
usually #3 Doubles 80%, also #2 Doubles 20% · published 3.5
3.33
Sharon Campbell
published
3.30
Gary Glish
usually #2 Doubles 100% · published 3.5
3.20
Jeffrey Kopf
published
Patty Dischinger
published
Valerie Conklin
published
Established pairs

Doubles pairs from this roster with three or more matches together anywhere — ordered by performance against what the rating gap predicted, not by record.

Kristin Lahey + Gary Glish91844% games−8.0% vs expected
Andy Blackburn + Gary Glish3352% gamesnot enough data
Boyd Blackburn + Andy Blackburn2349% gamesnot enough data
Gary Glish + Diane Birkemo2342% gamesnot enough data
Boyd Blackburn + Diane Birkemo224 matchesnot enough data
Roster

Ordered by our estimated dynamic rating, which is why two players at the same published level are not tied — a published 4.0 says nothing about where inside the band someone sits. Lines played in this team’s season are shown beside each name.

4.5
Boyd Blackburn
110W–117L career · 5 lines in 2022
35%65%<1%
4.05
4
Kristin Lahey
193W–168L career · 2 lines in 2022
<1%86%14%
3.86
4
BRYAN WRIGHT
11W–12L career · no lines in 2022
2%94%4%
3.77
4
Diane Birkemo
46W–70L career · type A · no lines in 2022
48%52%<1%
3.50
Jeanne Beckley
5W–11L career · no lines in 2022
59%41%<1%
3.47
3.5
Andy Blackburn
114W–90L career · 5 lines in 2022
<1%69%31%
3.44
Sharon Campbell
9W–16L career · no lines in 2022
91%9%<1%
3.33
3.5
Gary Glish
141W–124L career · 2 lines in 2022
1%92%7%
3.30
Jeffrey Kopf
2W–3L career · no lines in 2022
6%93%1%
3.20
Patty Dischinger
2W–4L career · no lines in 2022
not enough data
Valerie Conklin
16W–18L career · no lines in 2022
not enough data

Three percentages are where each player stands right now: the chance they are below their band, inside it, or above it, on the way they are playing this season. The number on the right is our estimated dynamic rating, which USTA never publishes. This is today rather than a forecast of December, because a forecast has to assume future matches and cannot know whether someone will even be offered them. Percentages are blank where a player has too few matches this season, or at a level where the model does not yet beat a base-rate guess; the estimate is a weaker claim than a probability and survives where those do not.

Not affiliated with or endorsed by the USTA. Ratings labelled as published are USTA year-end figures; anything we describe as an estimate is ours, not USTA’s. Match data is from USTA TennisLink.