Teams

CLetorney (Piper Glen)

2025 Adult 55 & Over League · 55 & Over Adult 3.0 Women - Mon AM

10 players · average NTRP 3.00 / NORTH CAROLINA

View scouting list →
Schedule6 played
2025-04-28vs PQuinn/JCaldwell (Matthews)Won 20
W#1 DoublesYin Han / Brenda Tobia vs Pamela Huggins / Carol Gress7-5, 1-6, 1-0
W#3 DoublesBridget Megginson / Mildred Hurd vs Barbara Liddle / Carolyn Henderson7-6, 7-6
2025-04-21vs JMiller (WSRC)Split 11
L#1 DoublesDebby Bosselman / Bridget Megginson vs Joanne Miller / Nanette Murphy1-6, 6-7
W#3 DoublesBrenda Tobia / Yin Han vs Sally Blocksom / Deidre Miesse6-3, 6-4
2025-04-16vs LCranford (Sardis)Won 10
W#3 DoublesMildred Hurd / Brenda Tobia vs Sharon Smith / Wanda Doss6-1, 6-1
2025-04-08vs CWilson/MDavis (Southampton)Lost 01
L#3 DoublesDebby Bosselman / Bridget Megginson vs Denise Lindner / Gina O'Toole2-6, 3-6
2025-03-17vs KNovak (Charlotte Tennis NC)Won 20
W#1 DoublesBrenda Tobia / Lisa Wright vs Susan Shimulunas / Vicki Greenway6-1, 6-3
W#3 DoublesBridget Megginson / Debby Bosselman vs Kristi Lee / Kathy Novak6-1, 6-4
2025-03-13vs KIrwin (Life Time)Split 11
L#2 DoublesBridget Megginson / Kathy Hoffman vs Natalie Denton / Lou Rives7-5, 3-6, 0-1
W#3 DoublesYin Han / Brenda Tobia vs Stacie Brown / Ursula Bonar6-2, 6-0
A tie can be incomplete. Tell us if someone is missing.
i
Grouped by tie — one fixture, several lines. A line shows only when a player on it is someone we have indexed, so an early-season tie for a newly-added team can look short. This also means the line count here will not match the header, which counts individual player appearances.

Flight standings for 55 & Over Adult 3.0 Women - Mon AM have not been collected yet. Where we have them we show every team in the flight ranked, with this team highlighted. The crawler is still filling in older seasons and flights.

ScoutingWhere each opponent usually plays

Signed-in extra: whether this captain plays strict strength order or mixes it up, from every doubles line they have put out. Create a free account to see it.

Roster averages 2.70 estimated across 7 rated players. No lineup is published in advance, so the column below is where each player has actually been used — a captain's habits are the best available forecast. Sign in and claim your record to see who you have played.

2.92
Yin Han
published
2.89
Lisa Wright
published
2.77
Denise Boeh
published 3
2.76
Bridget Megginson
usually #2 Doubles 50%, also #3 Doubles 30% · published 3
Debby Bosselman
published 3
Mildred Hurd
published 3
2.58
Kathy Hoffman
published
2.54
Brenda Tobia
usually #3 Doubles 60%, also #1 Doubles 40% · published 3
2.48
Carrie Letorney
published 3
Sheryl Reynolds
published
Established pairs

Doubles pairs from this roster with three or more matches together anywhere — ordered by performance against what the rating gap predicted, not by record.

Mildred Hurd + Debby Bosselman123 matchesnot enough data
Brenda Tobia + Bridget Megginson033 matchesnot enough data
Roster

Ordered by our estimated dynamic rating, which is why two players at the same published level are not tied — a published 4.0 says nothing about where inside the band someone sits. Lines played in this team’s season are shown beside each name.

Yin Han
13W–19L career · no lines in 2025
72%28%<1%
2.92
Lisa Wright
24W–10L career · no lines in 2025
<1%78%21%
2.89
3
Denise Boeh
2W–7L career · no lines in 2025
3%92%5%
2.77
3
Bridget Megginson
23W–45L career · 10 lines in 2025
3%92%5%
2.76
3
Debby Bosselman
18W–46L career · no lines in 2025
not enough data
3
Mildred Hurd
44W–58L career · no lines in 2025
not enough data
Kathy Hoffman
14W–12L career · no lines in 2025
28%72%<1%
2.58
3
Brenda Tobia
32W–71L career · 5 lines in 2025
40%60%<1%
2.54
3
Carrie Letorney
15W–29L career · no lines in 2025
57%43%<1%
2.48
Sheryl Reynolds
0W–1L career · no lines in 2025
not enough data

Three percentages are where each player stands right now: the chance they are below their band, inside it, or above it, on the way they are playing this season. The number on the right is our estimated dynamic rating, which USTA never publishes. This is today rather than a forecast of December, because a forecast has to assume future matches and cannot know whether someone will even be offered them. Percentages are blank where a player has too few matches this season, or at a level where the model does not yet beat a base-rate guess; the estimate is a weaker claim than a probability and survives where those do not.

Not affiliated with or endorsed by the USTA. Ratings labelled as published are USTA year-end figures; anything we describe as an estimate is ours, not USTA’s. Match data is from USTA TennisLink.