Teams

UPTA18C/Oshea/GCC

2026 UPTA Combo 18 & Over - SC · 18+ Combo Women - 7.5

19 players · average NTRP 3.62 / SOUTH CAROLINA

No matches recorded for this roster in this league — it may be a placeholder registration, or the season may not have started.

View scouting list →
Schedule2 upcoming · 4 played
Sep 8 9:00 AM
Greenville Country Club
Sep 15 9:00 AM
Tracy O'Shea
2026-09-01vs UPTA18C/Blinston/Hwy14Lost 03
L#1 DoublesHarriet Gray / Carter Andrews vs Christina Rogers / Elizabeth Malcolm3-6, 7-5, 0-1
L#2 DoublesKaren Culumovic / Cindy Cannon vs Celeste Blinston / Stacey Thomas3-6, 1-6
L#3 DoublesLindsey Batavia / Natalie Brown vs Natalie Bieber / Jamie Miller1-6, 4-6
2026-08-25vs UPTA18C/Franz/ACACWon 30
W#1 DoublesDonyelle Wilkins / Carter Andrews vs Rebecca Maddox / Julie Branham7-5, 6-3
W#2 DoublesNori Morgan / Kristen Patel vs Rebecca Haas / Michelle Scott7-5, 7-6
W#3 DoublesGina Hungerford / Elizabeth Philmon vs Adelia Hodge / Monika Franz6-2, 6-4
2026-08-18vs UPTA18C/Hull/ThornbladeWon 21
W#1 DoublesCallie Darragh / Danette Kabas vs Amy Jacoby / Jill Seeley6-2, 4-6, 1-0
L#2 DoublesHarriet Gray / Lisa Baumhofer vs Kathleen Hull / Laura Garrett4-6, 0-6
W#3 DoublesKaren Culumovic / Ali Hill vs Kelly Clay / Amy Williams4-6, 6-3, 1-0
2026-08-11vs UPTA18C/Blinston/Hwy14Lost 12
W#1 DoublesGina Hungerford / Drake Gribbin vs Christina Rogers / Stacey Thomas6-3, 6-4
L#2 DoublesCallie Darragh / Elizabeth Philmon vs Natalie Bieber / Maria Gulli4-6, 6-1, 0-1
L#3 DoublesKaren Culumovic / Kristen Patel vs Kathryn Rountree / Elizabeth Malcolm0-6, 1-6
A tie can be incomplete. Tell us if someone is missing.
i
Grouped by tie — one fixture, several lines. A line shows only when a player on it is someone we have indexed, so an early-season tie for a newly-added team can look short. This also means the line count here will not match the header, which counts individual player appearances.
Flight standings4 teams · 18+ Combo Women - 7.5
TeamWLInd. WInd. LSets lostGames lost
1UPTA18C/Blinston/Hwy142042546
2UPTA18C/Oshea/GCC1133856
3UPTA18C/Hull/Thornblade0112426
4UPTA18C/Franz/ACAC0112431

Ordered by team wins, then losses, then sets lost — the order USTA uses to seed a flight. Individual wins are lines, not ties.

See the full flight, with every team’s record

ScoutingWhere each opponent usually plays

Signed-in extra: whether this captain plays strict strength order or mixes it up, from every doubles line they have put out. Create a free account to see it.

Roster averages 3.32 estimated across 18 rated players. No lineup is published in advance, so the column below is where each player has actually been used — a captain's habits are the best available forecast. Sign in and claim your record to see who you have played.

3.79
3.72
Nori Morgan
usually #2 Doubles 100% · published
3.63
Callie Darragh
usually #2 Doubles 50%, also #1 Doubles 50% · published 4
3.56
Donyelle Wilkins
usually #1 Doubles 100% · published
3.52
Gina Hungerford
usually #1 Doubles 50%, also #3 Doubles 50% · published
3.50
Ali Hollstegge
published 3.5
3.49
Traci Hughes
published
3.28
Elizabeth Philmon
usually #2 Doubles 75%, also #3 Doubles 25% · published
3.24
Karen Culumovic
usually #3 Doubles 67%, also #2 Doubles 33% · published
3.20
Harriet Gray
usually #2 Doubles 50%, also #1 Doubles 50% · published
3.19
Joanna Bragdon
published
3.16
Lindsey Batavia
usually #3 Doubles 100% · published
3.14
Danette Kabas
usually #1 Doubles 100% · published 3.5
3.12
Kristen Patel
usually #3 Doubles 50%, also #2 Doubles 50% · published
3.11
Drake Gribbin
usually #1 Doubles 100% · published
3.09
Natalie Brown
usually #3 Doubles 100% · published
3.08
Cindy Cannon
usually #2 Doubles 100% · published 3.5
2.98
Tracy O'Shea
published
Lisa Baumhofer
usually #2 Doubles 100% · published
Established pairs

Doubles pairs from this roster with three or more matches together anywhere — ordered by performance against what the rating gap predicted, not by record.

Joanna Bragdon + Kristen Patel8078% games+20.9% vs expected
Lindsey Batavia + Callie Darragh4263% games+11.4% vs expected
Nori Morgan + Traci Hughes5157% games+10.3% vs expected
Katherine Sturdevant + Callie Darragh5163% games+10.0% vs expected
Donyelle Wilkins + Callie Darragh4260% games+8.4% vs expected
Traci Hughes + Karen Culumovic5549% games+6.2% vs expected
Tracy O'Shea + Natalie Brown5247% games+3.2% vs expected
Callie Darragh + Karen Culumovic404 matchesnot enough data
Roster

Ordered by our estimated dynamic rating, which is why two players at the same published level are not tied — a published 4.0 says nothing about where inside the band someone sits. Lines played in this team’s season are shown beside each name.

Katherine Sturdevant
14W–4L career · no lines in 2026
2%92%6%
3.79
Nori Morgan
9W–4L career · 1 line in 2026
6%92%2%
3.72
4
Callie Darragh
26W–7L career · 2 lines in 2026
17%83%<1%
3.63
Donyelle Wilkins
10W–7L career · 1 line in 2026
34%66%<1%
3.56
Gina Hungerford
30W–6L career · 2 lines in 2026
<1%<1%>99%
3.52
3.5
Ali Hollstegge
16W–8L career · no lines in 2026
<1%51%49%
3.50
Traci Hughes
24W–19L career · no lines in 2026
53%47%<1%
3.49
Elizabeth Philmon
17W–17L career · 4 lines in 2026
2%92%6%
3.28
Karen Culumovic
41W–32L career · 3 lines in 2026
<1%4%96%
3.24
Harriet Gray
6W–8L career · 2 lines in 2026
<1%7%93%
3.20
Joanna Bragdon
27W–8L career · no lines in 2026
<1%9%91%
3.19
Lindsey Batavia
12W–12L career · 1 line in 2026
<1%13%87%
3.16
3.5
Danette Kabas
10W–16L career · 1 line in 2026
16%84%1%
3.14
Kristen Patel
46W–22L career · 2 lines in 2026
<1%19%81%
3.12
Drake Gribbin
37W–17L career · 1 line in 2026
<1%21%79%
3.11
Natalie Brown
9W–7L career · 1 line in 2026
<1%27%73%
3.09
3.5
Cindy Cannon
13W–17L career · 1 line in 2026
28%72%<1%
3.08
Tracy O'Shea
39W–25L career · no lines in 2026
<1%55%45%
2.98
Lisa Baumhofer
1W–9L career · 1 line in 2026
not enough data

Three percentages are where each player stands right now: the chance they are below their band, inside it, or above it, on the way they are playing this season. The number on the right is our estimated dynamic rating, which USTA never publishes. This is today rather than a forecast of December, because a forecast has to assume future matches and cannot know whether someone will even be offered them. Percentages are blank where a player has too few matches this season, or at a level where the model does not yet beat a base-rate guess; the estimate is a weaker claim than a probability and survives where those do not.

Not affiliated with or endorsed by the USTA. Ratings labelled as published are USTA year-end figures; anything we describe as an estimate is ours, not USTA’s. Match data is from USTA TennisLink.