Teams

Sunrise/DeAndreis

2026 Broward Combo 50 & Over · 7.5 Men

11 players · average NTRP 3.70 / REGION_8

View scouting list →
Schedule2 played
2026-08-24vs Wrc/EstradaLost 03
L#1 DoublesFabian Centeno / Leonardo Fabian Posadas vs Ankur Kapoor / Philippe Chelle3-6, 0-6
L#2 DoublesCarlos Cadet / LUIS HERNANDEZ vs Mauricio Camacho / Roberto Nieves4-6, 4-6
L#3 DoublesJorge Evaristo / Moises Humberto Abraham Aguirre vs Santiago Restrepo / Michael Kamrad3-6, 2-6
2026-08-18vs Midtown/EttedguilLost 01
L#2 DoublesTedd Rosinsky / Jorge Evaristo vs Pipo Torrellas / Enrique Bonifaz0-6, 4-6
A tie can be incomplete. Tell us if someone is missing.
i
Grouped by tie — one fixture, several lines. A line shows only when a player on it is someone we have indexed, so an early-season tie for a newly-added team can look short. This also means the line count here will not match the header, which counts individual player appearances.
Flight standings2 teams · 7.5 Men
TeamWLInd. WInd. LSets lostGames lost
1Sunrise/DeAndreis000000
2Midtown/Ettedguil0112534

Ordered by team wins, then losses, then sets lost — the order USTA uses to seed a flight. Individual wins are lines, not ties.

See the full flight, with every team’s record

ScoutingWhere each opponent usually plays

Signed-in extra: whether this captain plays strict strength order or mixes it up, from every doubles line they have put out. Create a free account to see it.

Roster averages 3.49 estimated across 10 rated players. No lineup is published in advance, so the column below is where each player has actually been used — a captain's habits are the best available forecast. Sign in and claim your record to see who you have played.

3.81
3.80
Jorge Corrales
published
3.77
Mario Garcia
published
3.73
Jorge Evaristo
usually #3 Doubles 50%, also #2 Doubles 50% · published
3.66
Carlos Cadet
usually #2 Doubles 100% · published 4
3.56
Fabian Centeno
usually #1 Doubles 100% · published 4
3.38
Carlos Delgado
published 3.5
3.24
LUIS HERNANDEZ
usually #2 Doubles 100% · published
3.18
Shane Wells
published
2.80
Leonardo Fabian Posadas
usually #1 Doubles 100% · published 3
Moises Humberto Abraham Aguirre
usually #3 Doubles 100% · published
Established pairs

Doubles pairs from this roster with three or more matches together anywhere — ordered by performance against what the rating gap predicted, not by record.

Shane Wells + Mario Garcia213 matchesnot enough data
Roster

Ordered by our estimated dynamic rating, which is why two players at the same published level are not tied — a published 4.0 says nothing about where inside the band someone sits. Lines played in this team’s season are shown beside each name.

4
Franco de Andreis
237W–172L career · no lines in 2026
1%90%9%
3.81
Jorge Corrales
2W–3L career · no lines in 2026
2%91%7%
3.80
Mario Garcia
2W–2L career · no lines in 2026
<1%3%97%
3.77
Jorge Evaristo
13W–10L career · 2 lines in 2026
5%92%3%
3.73
4
Carlos Cadet
12W–8L career · 1 line in 2026
13%86%1%
3.66
4
Fabian Centeno
82W–124L career · 1 line in 2026
34%66%<1%
3.56
3.5
Carlos Delgado
13W–7L career · no lines in 2026
<1%80%20%
3.38
LUIS HERNANDEZ
17W–27L career · 1 line in 2026
4%93%3%
3.24
Shane Wells
20W–24L career · no lines in 2026
10%89%1%
3.18
3
Leonardo Fabian Posadas
4W–8L career · type S · 1 line in 2026
2%91%8%
2.80
Moises Humberto Abraham Aguirre
5W–11L career · 1 line in 2026
not enough data

Three percentages are where each player stands right now: the chance they are below their band, inside it, or above it, on the way they are playing this season. The number on the right is our estimated dynamic rating, which USTA never publishes. This is today rather than a forecast of December, because a forecast has to assume future matches and cannot know whether someone will even be offered them. Percentages are blank where a player has too few matches this season, or at a level where the model does not yet beat a base-rate guess; the estimate is a weaker claim than a probability and survives where those do not.

Not affiliated with or endorsed by the USTA. Ratings labelled as published are USTA year-end figures; anything we describe as an estimate is ours, not USTA’s. Match data is from USTA TennisLink.