Teams

SAC/Smith/3.5

USTA Mixed 40 & Over · 3.5 Adult Mixed

9 players · average NTRP 3.25 / SOUTH CAROLINA

No matches recorded for this roster in this league — it may be a placeholder registration, or the season may not have started.

View scouting list →
Schedule7 played
2026-07-31vs SATL 3.5M 40 & Over (Patterson)Won 10
W#2 DoublesJoan Smith / Ron Smith vs Cathy Brinegar / Ron Moore4-6, 6-3, 1-0
2026-07-09vs SATL 3.5M 40 & Over (Patterson)Split 11
L#2 DoublesEvan Mulch / Joan Smith vs Jason Patterson / Justine Allen4-6, 4-6
W#3 DoublesCindy Gitlitz / Daniel Mason vs Edie Clator / Daniel Feig2-6, 6-4, 1-0
2026-06-11vs SATL 3.5M 40 & Over (Patterson)Won 21
W#1 DoublesTravis Greer / Jamie Miller vs Myint Khaing / Natalie Barry4-6, 6-2, 1-0
L#2 DoublesEvan Mulch / Cindy Gitlitz vs Manuel Garcia / Edie Clator3-6, 0-6
W#3 DoublesDaniel Mason / Joan Smith vs Daniel Feig / Courtney Nix6-3, 5-7, 1-0
2026-06-04vs SATL 3.5M 40 & Over (Patterson)Lost 01
L#3 DoublesMona Cooper / Ron Smith vs Justine Allen / Sean Tario2-6, 1-6
2026-05-28vs SATL 3.5M 40 & Over (Patterson)Lost 02
L#1 DoublesCindy Gitlitz / Martin Woods vs Natalie Barry / Daniel Hines4-6, 2-6
L#3 DoublesJoan Smith / Ron Smith vs Ron Moore / Cathy Brinegar6-4, 3-6, 1-0
2026-05-21vs SATL 3.5M 40 & Over (Patterson)Lost 02
L#2 DoublesTravis Greer / Joan Smith vs Daniel Feig / Cathy Brinegar5-7, 5-7
L#3 DoublesDaniel Mason / Mona Cooper vs Courtney Nix / Manuel Garcia6-3, 2-6, 0-1
2026-05-14vs SATL 3.5M 40 & Over (Patterson)Lost 01
L#3 DoublesTravis Greer / Mona Cooper vs Kelly Birch / Sean Tario4-6, 3-6
A tie can be incomplete. Tell us if someone is missing.
i
Grouped by tie — one fixture, several lines. A line shows only when a player on it is someone we have indexed, so an early-season tie for a newly-added team can look short. This also means the line count here will not match the header, which counts individual player appearances.
Flight standings2 teams · 3.5 Adult Mixed
TeamWLInd. WInd. LSets lostGames lost
1SATL 3.5M 40 & Over (Patterson)43111023197
2SAC/Smith/3.53491229211

Ordered by team wins, then losses, then sets lost — the order USTA uses to seed a flight. Individual wins are lines, not ties.

See the full flight, with every team’s record

ScoutingWhere each opponent usually plays

Signed-in extra: whether this captain plays strict strength order or mixes it up, from every doubles line they have put out. Create a free account to see it.

Roster averages 3.16 estimated across 7 rated players. No lineup is published in advance, so the column below is where each player has actually been used — a captain's habits are the best available forecast. Sign in and claim your record to see who you have played.

3.43
Martin Woods
usually #1 Doubles 100% · published
3.40
Travis Greer
usually #3 Doubles 33%, also #2 Doubles 33% · published
3.19
Ron Smith
usually #3 Doubles 67%, also #2 Doubles 33% · published
3.15
Cindy Gitlitz
usually #1 Doubles 33%, also #3 Doubles 33% · published 3.5
3.03
Mona Cooper
usually #3 Doubles 100% · published
3.02
Evan Mulch
usually #2 Doubles 100% · published
2.88
Daniel Mason
usually #3 Doubles 100% · published 3
Jamie Miller
published
Joan Smith
published
Roster

Ordered by our estimated dynamic rating, which is why two players at the same published level are not tied — a published 4.0 says nothing about where inside the band someone sits. Lines played in this team’s season are shown beside each name.

Martin Woods
13W–10L career · 1 line in 2026
<1%69%31%
3.43
Travis Greer
20W–9L career · 3 lines in 2026
<1%77%23%
3.40
Ron Smith
20W–19L career · 3 lines in 2026
8%90%1%
3.19
3.5
Cindy Gitlitz
33W–30L career · 3 lines in 2026
15%85%1%
3.15
Mona Cooper
34W–45L career · 3 lines in 2026
<1%42%58%
3.03
Evan Mulch
13W–14L career · 2 lines in 2026
45%55%<1%
3.02
3
Daniel Mason
22W–11L career · 3 lines in 2026
<1%80%20%
2.88
Jamie Miller
9W–1L career · no lines in 2026
not enough data
Joan Smith
7W–6L career · no lines in 2026
not enough data

Three percentages are where each player stands right now: the chance they are below their band, inside it, or above it, on the way they are playing this season. The number on the right is our estimated dynamic rating, which USTA never publishes. This is today rather than a forecast of December, because a forecast has to assume future matches and cannot know whether someone will even be offered them. Percentages are blank where a player has too few matches this season, or at a level where the model does not yet beat a base-rate guess; the estimate is a weaker claim than a probability and survives where those do not.

Not affiliated with or endorsed by the USTA. Ratings labelled as published are USTA year-end figures; anything we describe as an estimate is ours, not USTA’s. Match data is from USTA TennisLink.