Teams

NRS - Albrecht

2022 IRMSL Mixed 40 & OVER · 8.0 - M

8 players · average NTRP 4.00 / REGION_6

No matches recorded for this roster in this league — it may be a placeholder registration, or the season may not have started.

View scouting list →
Schedule8 played
2022-03-21Won 10
W#1 DoublesReinalyn Albrecht / John Albrecht vs Deanne Decker / Robert Lacey6-3, 6-4
2022-02-28vs Boulevard - SoutherlyWon 10
W#1 DoublesReinalyn Albrecht / John Albrecht vs Whitney Hazelton / Kristin Hazelton3-6, 6-3, 1-0
2022-02-21Won 10
W#1 DoublesJohn Albrecht / Reinalyn Albrecht vs Nickolaus Edwards / Cheryl Golgart7-6, 6-4
2022-02-14vs IRMSL/Buttonwood - ShullLost 01
L#2 DoublesEric Zoetmulder / Reinalyn Albrecht vs Binny Montenegro / Tanya Mikel4-6, 1-6
2022-02-07vs VBTC - ModicaSplit 11
W#1 DoublesJohn Albrecht / Reinalyn Albrecht vs Mark Hanlon / Laurie Trippet7-5, 7-5
L#3 DoublesVinny Mistretta / Renee' Palmer vs Robert Lacey / Deborah Lloyd3-6, 3-6
2022-01-24vs Boulevard - SoutherlyLost 01
L#2 DoublesEric Zoetmulder / Reinalyn Albrecht vs John McConnell / Kate Simpson6-7, 2-6
2022-01-17Split 11
W#1 DoublesReinalyn Albrecht / John Albrecht vs David Coutts / Charity Ginger3-6, 6-4, 1-0
L#2 DoublesRenee' Palmer / Mark Crawford vs Maria Velasco / Fernando Velasco6-4, 3-6, 1-0
2022-01-12vs IRMSL/Buttonwood - ShullWon 10
W#2 DoublesReinalyn Albrecht / John Albrecht vs Guadalupe Avinzano / Christopher Burkhardt6-3, 7-6
A tie can be incomplete. Tell us if someone is missing.
i
Grouped by tie — one fixture, several lines. A line shows only when a player on it is someone we have indexed, so an early-season tie for a newly-added team can look short. This also means the line count here will not match the header, which counts individual player appearances.

Flight standings for 8.0 - M have not been collected yet. Where we have them we show every team in the flight ranked, with this team highlighted. The crawler is still filling in older seasons and flights.

ScoutingWhere each opponent usually plays

Signed-in extra: whether this captain plays strict strength order or mixes it up, from every doubles line they have put out. Create a free account to see it.

Roster averages 3.65 estimated across 4 rated players. No lineup is published in advance, so the column below is where each player has actually been used — a captain's habits are the best available forecast. Sign in and claim your record to see who you have played.

3.93
Eric Zoetmulder
published 4
3.88
Bryan Richardson
published 4
3.41
Reinalyn Albrecht
usually #1 Doubles 63%, also #2 Doubles 38% · published
3.38
Renee' Palmer
usually #2 Doubles 60%, also #3 Doubles 40% · published
John Albrecht
published
Lisa Thiesen
published
Susan Dennett
published
Thomas Marvin
published
Established pairs

Doubles pairs from this roster with three or more matches together anywhere — ordered by performance against what the rating gap predicted, not by record.

Lisa Thiesen + Bryan Richardson033 matchesnot enough data
Roster

Ordered by our estimated dynamic rating, which is why two players at the same published level are not tied — a published 4.0 says nothing about where inside the band someone sits. Lines played in this team’s season are shown beside each name.

4
Eric Zoetmulder
9W–1L career · no lines in 2022
<1%71%29%
3.93
4
Bryan Richardson
11W–11L career · no lines in 2022
<1%83%17%
3.88
Reinalyn Albrecht
33W–57L career · 8 lines in 2022
<1%75%25%
3.41
Renee' Palmer
64W–70L career · 5 lines in 2022
82%18%<1%
3.38
John Albrecht
0W–3L career · no lines in 2022
not enough data
Lisa Thiesen
2W–11L career · no lines in 2022
not enough data
Susan Dennett
0W–2L career · no lines in 2022
not enough data
Thomas Marvin
2W–4L career · no lines in 2022
not enough data

Three percentages are where each player stands right now: the chance they are below their band, inside it, or above it, on the way they are playing this season. The number on the right is our estimated dynamic rating, which USTA never publishes. This is today rather than a forecast of December, because a forecast has to assume future matches and cannot know whether someone will even be offered them. Percentages are blank where a player has too few matches this season, or at a level where the model does not yet beat a base-rate guess; the estimate is a weaker claim than a probability and survives where those do not.

Not affiliated with or endorsed by the USTA. Ratings labelled as published are USTA year-end figures; anything we describe as an estimate is ours, not USTA’s. Match data is from USTA TennisLink.