Teams

A18 2.5W PM1 Perkins

2025 NEOTA Adult 18 & Over Summer · NEOTA A18&O 2.5 Women Summer

13 players · average NTRP 2.75 / NORTHEASTERN OHIO

No matches recorded for this roster in this league — it may be a placeholder registration, or the season may not have started.

View scouting list →
Schedule10 played
2025-07-16vs A18 2.5W TP2 LefflerSplit 11
W#1 SinglesMegan Vogrin vs Madison Cox6-2, 4-6, 1-0
L#2 DoublesJen Sharp / Kerry Bingham vs Montara Kiss / Susan Reese6-4, 3-6, 1-0
2025-07-09vs A18 2.5W LT2 MitchellWon 21
W#1 DoublesJessie Perkins / ALISON Halliday vs Michelle Pinnow / Sarah Goel6-0, 6-4
L#1 SinglesDanielle Mazullo vs Jenna Obert3-6, 5-7
W#2 DoublesSara Hatton / Alexis Tomanda vs Mary Mitchell / Kristy Royle6-4, 4-6, 1-0
2025-07-02vs A18 2.5W CRC2 KingWon 30
W#1 DoublesKatherine Davis / Jessie Perkins vs Mirna Ayache / Jamie Friedman6-3, 6-4
W#1 SinglesViktoriya Giglyuk vs Courtney Kiffner6-1, 6-1
W#2 DoublesRana Raad / Jen Sharp vs Jennifer Michaelson / Laura Hui6-3, 6-0
2025-06-25vs A18 2.5W CV1 FromsonWon 20
W#1 DoublesJessie Perkins / ALISON Halliday vs Krista Ensign / Carrie Fromson6-1, 6-4
W#2 DoublesKatherine Davis / Jen Sharp vs Mary Murray / Nicole Parker6-0, 6-1
2025-06-18vs A18 2.5W MV2 VentreSplit 11
L#1 DoublesDana Fisher / Alexis Tomanda vs Emily Fitzpatrick / Morgan Willoughby2-6, 5-7
W#2 DoublesViktoriya Giglyuk / Katherine Davis vs Valerie Kuykendall / Sarah Richlak6-1, 6-3
2025-06-11vs A18 2.5W TP2 LefflerSplit 11
W#1 DoublesJessie Perkins / Quinnie Lane vs Lisa Johnson / Diane Kilivris6-4, 7-6
L#2 DoublesKerry Bingham / Sara Hatton vs Laura Dhavale / Allison Landes2-6, 0-6
2025-06-04vs A18 2.5W LT2 MitchellLost 12
L#1 DoublesDana Fisher / Sara Hatton vs Michelle Pinnow / Sarah Goel4-6, 5-7
L#1 SinglesDanielle Mazullo vs Jenna Obert4-6, 1-6
W#2 DoublesQuinnie Lane / Katherine Davis vs Beatrica Kovacova / Kristy Royle6-0, 6-1
2025-05-28vs A18 2.5W CRC2 KingLost 12
L#1 DoublesJessie Perkins / ALISON Halliday vs Vaishali Shetty / Mimy Tong6-1, 5-7, 0-1
L#1 SinglesDanielle Mazullo vs Jennifer Zidar4-6, 7-5, 0-1
W#2 DoublesRana Raad / Dana Fisher vs Shelly Saltzman / Aanchal Sharma6-0, 6-0
2025-05-21vs A18 2.5W CV1 FromsonWon 21
W#1 DoublesJen Sharp / Dana Fisher vs Jin Shao / Emily Washington7-6, 1-6, 1-0
L#1 SinglesALISON Halliday vs Ally Taylor4-6, 6-2, 0-1
W#2 DoublesKerry Bingham / Sara Hatton vs Nicole Parker / Priscilla Keller1-6, 6-3, 1-0
2025-05-14vs A18 2.5W MV2 VentreWon 30
W#1 DoublesJessie Perkins / Viktoriya Giglyuk vs Giovanna Ventre / Lita Laven6-3, 6-3
W#1 SinglesMegan Vogrin vs Yuping Wu5-7, 7-5, 1-0
W#2 DoublesRana Raad / Katherine Davis vs Ritu Makkar / Misty Morris7-5, 7-6
A tie can be incomplete. Tell us if someone is missing.
i
Grouped by tie — one fixture, several lines. A line shows only when a player on it is someone we have indexed, so an early-season tie for a newly-added team can look short. This also means the line count here will not match the header, which counts individual player appearances.

Flight standings for NEOTA A18&O 2.5 Women Summer have not been collected yet. Where we have them we show every team in the flight ranked, with this team highlighted. The crawler is still filling in older seasons and flights.

ScoutingWhere each opponent usually plays

Signed-in extra: whether this captain plays strict strength order or mixes it up, from every doubles line they have put out. Create a free account to see it.

Roster averages 2.40 estimated across 7 rated players. No lineup is published in advance, so the column below is where each player has actually been used — a captain's habits are the best available forecast. Sign in and claim your record to see who you have played.

Dana Fisher
published 3
2.66
ALISON Halliday
usually #1 Doubles 75%, also #1 Singles 25% · published 3
2.66
Megan Vogrin
usually #1 Singles 100% · published
2.56
Quinnie Lane
usually #2 Doubles 50%, also #1 Doubles 50% · published
2.40
Rana Raad
usually #2 Doubles 100% · published
2.34
Alexis Tomanda
usually #2 Doubles 50%, also #1 Doubles 50% · published 2.5
2.27
Jen Sharp
usually #2 Doubles 75%, also #1 Doubles 25% · published
Danielle Mazullo
usually #1 Singles 75%, also #3 Doubles 25% · published 2.5
1.91
Jessica Schilling
published
Jessie Perkins
usually #1 Doubles 100% · published
Kerry Bingham
usually #2 Doubles 100% · published
Sara Hatton
usually #2 Doubles 75%, also #1 Doubles 25% · published
Viktoriya Giglyuk
usually #1 Doubles 33%, also #2 Doubles 33% · published
Established pairs

Doubles pairs from this roster with three or more matches together anywhere — ordered by performance against what the rating gap predicted, not by record.

Jessie Perkins + ALISON Halliday4172% games+22.0% vs expected
Jen Sharp + Jessie Perkins123 matchesnot enough data
Roster

Ordered by our estimated dynamic rating, which is why two players at the same published level are not tied — a published 4.0 says nothing about where inside the band someone sits. Lines played in this team’s season are shown beside each name.

3
Dana Fisher
0W–1L career · type A · no lines in 2025
not enough data
3
ALISON Halliday
29W–17L career · 4 lines in 2025
11%89%<1%
2.66
Megan Vogrin
11W–5L career · 2 lines in 2025
12%88%<1%
2.66
Quinnie Lane
11W–11L career · 2 lines in 2025
0%31%69%
2.56
Rana Raad
4W–4L career · 3 lines in 2025
78%22%<1%
2.40
2.5
Alexis Tomanda
2W–4L career · type S · 2 lines in 2025
0%90%10%
2.34
Jen Sharp
19W–18L career · 4 lines in 2025
0%96%4%
2.27
2.5
Danielle Mazullo
7W–14L career · 4 lines in 2025
not enough data
Jessica Schilling
0W–3L career · no lines in 2025
0%>99%<1%
1.91
Jessie Perkins
19W–15L career · 6 lines in 2025
not enough data
Kerry Bingham
1W–2L career · 3 lines in 2025
not enough data
Sara Hatton
2W–2L career · 4 lines in 2025
not enough data
Viktoriya Giglyuk
3W–0L career · 3 lines in 2025
not enough data

Three percentages are where each player stands right now: the chance they are below their band, inside it, or above it, on the way they are playing this season. The number on the right is our estimated dynamic rating, which USTA never publishes. This is today rather than a forecast of December, because a forecast has to assume future matches and cannot know whether someone will even be offered them. Percentages are blank where a player has too few matches this season, or at a level where the model does not yet beat a base-rate guess; the estimate is a weaker claim than a probability and survives where those do not.

Not affiliated with or endorsed by the USTA. Ratings labelled as published are USTA year-end figures; anything we describe as an estimate is ours, not USTA’s. Match data is from USTA TennisLink.